Skip to main content
    QHSEtech

    Position Green Alternatives

    5 of 21 products that share a software category or a capability term with Position Green, matched on what their records document.

    Alternative products to investigate

    Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with Position Green: Diligent ESG, IBM Envizi, IsoMetrix, Normative and VelocityEHS (alphabetical, not a ranking).

    Position Green record checked 14 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the Position Green profile · How candidates are matched · Already using Position Green? What to check before switching

    Position Green's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial

    Software categories: ESG & Sustainability Reporting, Carbon Accounting and Materiality & Sustainability Intelligence. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: Position Green has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Contact vendor”). Pricing sources checked 14 October 2026: partially verified. Trial: trial status not established.

    Pricing source checked.

    • Diligent ESG

      Shares: ESG & Sustainability Reporting, Carbon Accounting and ESG Reporting

      Why listed, where it differs, against Position Green

      Why listed: Categories shared with Position Green: ESG & Sustainability Reporting and Carbon Accounting. Tags shared with Position Green: ESG Reporting. Pricing: Diligent ESG and Position Green have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Conditional in Diligent ESG's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Licensed factor portability” and “Board-ready ESG dashboards and benchmarks”.

      Against Position Green: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Diligent ESG, “Greenhouse gas calculations” and “Validation and traceability”; Position Green, “Double materiality assessment” and “Review and change history”. Integration capabilities: Diligent ESG, “Licensed Activity Data and Reports APIs” (conditional); Position Green, “API and connectors” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Diligent ESG, “Security and hosting evidence” (conditional).

    • IBM Envizi

      Shares: ESG & Sustainability Reporting, Carbon Accounting and ESG Reporting

      Why listed, where it differs, against Position Green

      Why listed: Categories shared with Position Green: ESG & Sustainability Reporting and Carbon Accounting. Tags shared with Position Green: ESG Reporting.

      Where it differs: Pricing: IBM Envizi has a published amount recorded as “Indicative estimate EUR 57,314.21-80,042.26 per year excluding tax (Essentials, one sample configuration)” (check product, module and purchase scope); Position Green has no verified published paid amount recorded. Conditional in IBM Envizi's record (2 of 8 capabilities): “Stakeholder submissions” and “Scope 1 and 2 accounting”.

      Against Position Green: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: IBM Envizi, “Disclosure workflow” and “Environmental calculation chain”; Position Green, “Double materiality assessment” and “Review and change history”. Pricing model: IBM Envizi, “Quoted subscription by data volume and functionality, with a public price estimator”; Position Green, “Contact vendor”. Integration capabilities: IBM Envizi, “Embedded emissions calculation API” (conditional); Position Green, “API and connectors” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: IBM Envizi, “Supply-chain calculation audit trail” (conditional).

    • IsoMetrix

      Shares: ESG & Sustainability Reporting, Carbon Accounting and ESG Reporting

      Why listed, where it differs, against Position Green

      Why listed: Categories shared with Position Green: ESG & Sustainability Reporting and Carbon Accounting. Tags shared with Position Green: ESG Reporting. Pricing: IsoMetrix and Position Green have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: IsoMetrix, documented offline workflow; Position Green, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to IsoMetrix only: EHS Management, Incident Management and Permit to Work.

      Against Position Green: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: IsoMetrix, “Quality NCR and CAPA workflow” and “Offline EHS forms” (2 of 6); Position Green, “Central data collection” and “Double materiality assessment” (2 of 3). Pricing model: IsoMetrix, “Contact vendor for a scoped quote”; Position Green, “Contact vendor”.

    • Normative

      Shares: ESG & Sustainability Reporting, Carbon Accounting and ESG Reporting

      Why listed, where it differs, against Position Green

      Why listed: Categories shared with Position Green: ESG & Sustainability Reporting and Carbon Accounting. Tags shared with Position Green: ESG Reporting. Pricing: Normative and Position Green have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Conditional in Normative's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Product footprints” and “ESG disclosure collection”.

      Against Position Green: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Normative, “Calculation evidence” and “Hybrid emissions-calculation methodology”; Position Green, “Double materiality assessment”. Access, security and record controls: Normative, “Tasks, permissions and audit history” (conditional).

    • VelocityEHS

      Shares: Carbon Accounting and ESG Reporting

      Why listed, where it differs, against Position Green

      Why listed: Categories shared with Position Green: Carbon Accounting. Tags shared with Position Green: ESG Reporting. Capability names sharing a term: Position Green's “Double materiality assessment” and VelocityEHS's “GHG and materiality”. Pricing: VelocityEHS and Position Green have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: VelocityEHS, documented offline workflow; Position Green, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to VelocityEHS only: EHS Management, Incident Management, Inspection Management, Chemical & SDS Management, Ergonomics, Environmental Management, Permit to Work and Industrial Hygiene. Conditional in VelocityEHS's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Electronic permit to work” and “Contractor qualification and self-service onboarding”.

      Against Position Green: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: VelocityEHS, “Chemical information on mobile” and “Environmental compliance and obligation tracking”; Position Green, “Review and change history”. Pricing model: VelocityEHS, “Request an application-specific proposal”; Position Green, “Contact vendor”.

    Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.

    16 more not listed. Browse the ESG & Sustainability Reporting category.

    Already using Position Green? What its record leaves open

    Limitations the Position Green profile records:

    • No general numeric subscription price verified
    • Group Consolidation has entitlement limits
    • Integrations need mapping and commercial scoping

    Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 14 October 2026): Carbon data processing; API and connectors; Group Consolidation; Supplier risk mapping and prioritisation; Supplier surveys and improvement follow-up; Decarbonization scenarios and action modelling; ESRS Sustainability Statement workspace. Check each against the contract you hold.

    Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):

    • “Carbon data processing”: IsoMetrix's “Carbon and supplier inputs” and Normative's “Corporate carbon inventory”.

    Position Green evaluation checks, for every candidate

    • Functional depth: Trace one material topic into an assigned and reviewed disclosure. Source
    • Usability & adoption: Observe a subsidiary contributor responding to a real group request. Source
    • Implementation & TCO: Price the organisational structure and required add-ons before rollout. Source
    • Integrations & API: Validate field mapping, refresh timing and failure handling for one source system. Source
    • Security & trust: Test reporter, controller and auditor permissions with representative data. Source

    Leaving Position Green: what to plan for

    • Group figures are held as approved snapshots rather than a live feed: an approved request copies the data, and a later correction needs a new request. Before leaving, list the approved requests, which subsidiary each came from and which version was filed. A replacement may not rebuild that sequence by syncing, so ask how it imports history of this kind and whether the old snapshots remain readable.
    • Materiality assessments hold scoring, stakeholder input and links to reporting disclosures. The links may be the expensive part to recreate: a list of subjects is quick to retype, but the reasoning behind each threshold and its evidence is not. Export the scoring visualisations and supporting evidence for each subject, and make sure someone on your team can still explain why each subject was in or out.
    • Carbon imports, connectors and the statement editor each need their own exit list. The reviewed guide covers financial spreadsheet imports, invoices as PDF, configured integrations and manual entry, while the editor can overwrite narrative on update. Note which sources feed which module, who maintains each connector, and whether any narrative text exists only inside the editor and must be copied out first.

    Who may have reason to stay with Position Green

    • A group with many reporting entities may have reason to stay when the present setup already matches its structure. Cross-setup requests depend on an add-on and plan-dependent organisation limits, so a move reopens which entities can request and share data. Compare against the smaller workflow in the record's verdict: with only a few entities, the group machinery may be more than you need.
    • No pricing page or amount was found on the check date, so a complaint about price cannot be tested against a list. Ask for an itemised proposal covering modules, entity allowances, the group add-on, integrations, implementation and advisory work before concluding that the product is expensive. A replacement quote may carry its own version of each line, and the comparison is only fair if you ask for all of them.
    • The platform documents approval stages, timestamped activity and role-based access, and the record says the separation of duties must be verified in configuration. If an auditor already accepts your approval trail, moving restarts that evidence. Equally, a move fixes nothing if the present setup lets one person enter and approve the same value; check that first.

    What to test in a trial of a replacement for Position Green

    • Set up a parent and two subsidiaries in the candidate, request a value with evidence, correct one submission after review and see how the group figure and its history change. Here a correction needs a fresh request, so a candidate that updates live is a different model, and which suits you depends on whether auditors need the frozen version that was originally submitted.
    • Take one high-risk supplier from survey to improvement action: inspect country, spend, tier and risk indicators, send a tailored survey, leave one answer overdue and check that review and reminder queues surface it. Exchange a test message and read the logged trail. The supplier module is conditional in the record, so confirm datasets and scoring settings appear in each candidate's quote.
    • Choose one source system, map a field, refresh it, then force a failed import and see who is told and who fixes it. The record asks for field mapping, refresh timing and failure handling on a single source, and for a named maintainer for connectors. If contributors travel, ask about offline collection too, since it was not verified for this product.

    Conditions and sources in the Position Green profile · Recorded commercial terms

    Position Green alternatives — frequently asked questions

    Which Position Green alternatives have published amounts?

    Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): IBM Envizi. No verified published paid amount recorded: Diligent ESG, IsoMetrix, Normative and VelocityEHS. Position Green has no verified published paid amount recorded.

    Which Position Green alternatives have a documented offline workflow?

    Documented offline workflow: IsoMetrix and VelocityEHS. Not yet classified: Diligent ESG, IBM Envizi and Normative. Offline filter: Position Green, not yet classified.

    Which Position Green alternatives document a free trial?

    Trial status not established: Diligent ESG, IBM Envizi, IsoMetrix, Normative and VelocityEHS. Trial: Position Green, trial status not established.