Skip to main content
    QHSEtech
    Updated
    Free Tool

    ISO 45001 Readiness Assessment

    Review 25 questions grouped under ISO 45001:2018 clauses 4–10. Record a self-reported implementation score and identify evidence to check with your team. The questions are a starting point, not a complete conformity assessment.

    How it works

    25 questions · 7 clause groups · Rate current practice and keep the evidence behind each answer.

    Clause 4
    Context of the Organization
    3 questions
    Clause 5
    Leadership & Worker Participation
    4 questions
    Clause 6
    Planning
    4 questions
    Clause 7
    Support (Resources, Competence, Communication)
    4 questions
    Clause 8
    Operation (Controls, Emergency, Procurement, Contractors)
    4 questions
    Clause 9
    Performance Evaluation
    4 questions
    Clause 10
    Improvement
    2 questions

    Evidence to gather before you rate yourself

    A self-rating is only as reliable as the records behind it. Before you answer the questions above, collect one example of each item below and note where it is kept and who owns it. If you cannot produce the example within a few minutes, the honest rating for that question is usually lower than your first instinct.

    • Scope and context: the written statement of which sites, activities and workers the management system covers, with the date it was last reviewed and who approved it.
    • Policy and responsibilities: the signed policy as workers actually receive it, plus a current list of named roles and what each is accountable for.
    • Worker participation: minutes, survey results or consultation records that show workers were asked about hazards and what changed as a result.
    • Hazards and risk: the risk assessments for one routine task and one non-routine task, each with its review date and the controls chosen.
    • Legal requirements register: the list of obligations that apply to you, with the source of each and the date it was last checked for changes.
    • Objectives: each objective with an owner, a measure, a deadline and the latest progress figure.
    • Competence: training or qualification records for a sample of roles, including contractors, with expiry dates where they apply.
    • Operational control: a recent permit, procedure or inspection record, and a record of how a change to a process or piece of equipment was assessed.
    • Emergency arrangements: the plan, the date of the last exercise and the actions that came out of it.
    • Evaluation and improvement: the latest internal audit report, the last management review record and one incident or near miss traced to a closed corrective action.

    Keep these examples in one folder or register. The same set is useful later when you brief an internal auditor, answer a customer questionnaire or talk to a certification body.

    Gaps that tend to appear when records are examined

    These are patterns worth looking for, described in general terms. They are not findings about your organisation and they are not a list of the requirements of the standard.

    • A document that exists but is not used. A procedure is approved and filed, yet the people doing the work cannot say where to find it or when it last changed.
    • Participation that is only top-down. Consultation is recorded as a presentation to workers, without a way for workers to raise a hazard and see the response.
    • Risk assessments that never change. The assessment predates a new machine, process or contractor and has no review date after the change.
    • Lagging measures only. Performance is reported through incident counts, with no measure of activities that prevent incidents, such as inspections completed or actions closed on time.
    • Actions closed without checking they worked. A corrective action is marked done when the task is complete, not when someone has confirmed the problem did not recur.
    • Contractors treated as outside the system. Induction, competence and supervision records exist for employees but not for the people who work on site under another employer.
    • Internal audits that avoid the difficult areas. The programme covers the same easy areas each cycle, and findings are not linked to management review.
    • Management review as a formality. The meeting happens, but the record shows no decisions, owners or follow-up from the previous meeting.

    An example preparation timeline

    A readiness score does not say how long preparation will take. To help you plan the order of work, this example spreads it over a year for one site. A larger scope, many open legal gaps or a certification body with a long waiting list would move every bar to the right.

    Illustrative ISO 45001 preparation in monthsAn example twelve-month preparation sequence: gap analysis, closing gaps, operating the system, internal audit and management review, correcting findings, then the certification audits.MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecSelf-rate and gatherevidenceMonth 1 · OH&S leadSet scope, gap analysisMonths 1 to 2 · Sponsor,OH&S leadClose gapsMonths 3 to 6 · ProcessownersOperate and keeprecordsMonths 5 to 9 · AllworkersInternal audit,management reviewMonths 8 to 9 · Auditor,managementAct on findingsMonth 10 · Process ownersStage 1 and stage 2auditsMonths 11 to 12 ·Certification bodyGap list agreedReady to book stage 1Milestones
    Illustrative example: month numbers are planning assumptions for one site, not a benchmark and not a prediction from a self-rating. Your scope and certification body set the real schedule.
    • Prepare
    • Operate
    • Certify
    Text version of this diagram
    1. Self-rate and gather evidence. Month 1. Owner: OH&S lead. Group: Prepare. The 25 questions on this page.
    2. Set scope, gap analysis. Months 1 to 2. Owner: Sponsor, OH&S lead. Group: Prepare.
    3. Close gaps. Months 3 to 6. Owner: Process owners. Group: Prepare. Risk assessments, legal register, worker consultation, competence, documents.
    4. Operate and keep records. Months 5 to 9. Owner: All workers. Group: Operate.
    5. Internal audit, management review. Months 8 to 9. Owner: Auditor, management. Group: Operate.
    6. Act on findings. Month 10. Owner: Process owners. Group: Operate.
    7. Stage 1 and stage 2 audits. Months 11 to 12. Owner: Certification body. Group: Certify. Audit days are set by the certification body, not by this example.

    Milestones

    • Gap list agreed. Reached at the end of month 2.
    • Ready to book stage 1. Reached at the end of month 10.

    Dependencies

    • Close gaps starts only after Set scope, gap analysis finishes.
    • Act on findings starts only after Internal audit, management review finishes.
    • Stage 1 and stage 2 audits starts only after Act on findings finishes. Act on internal audit findings before booking the certification audit.

    Using the result, and its limits

    Start with the three lowest clause groups, but also read the highest ones critically: a clause rated as embedded should be the easiest to support with an example from your folder. Turn every gap into one action with an owner and a date, and store it in the register you already use for corrective actions rather than in a separate document.

    The questions are paraphrased summaries of areas that the standard covers. They do not quote the standard, which is a paid publication, and they should not be read as its wording. For the requirements themselves, use a licensed copy from ISO or your national standards body. Whether a particular legal obligation applies to your workplace is a question for your regulator or a qualified adviser; this page does not give legal advice and does not predict an audit or certification result.

    A shorter version of the checklist, with 16 yes or no prompts, can be embedded on another site; see the widgets page. If the gaps point to a software need, the ISO 45001 software guide lists what to ask vendors to demonstrate.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does this assessment cover?
    It contains 25 editorial questions grouped under ISO 45001:2018 clauses 4–10. Use them to start an internal discussion and collect evidence. They do not cover every requirement of the standard.
    How is the score calculated?
    Each answer receives 0–4 points. The overall percentage is the total divided by the maximum of 100 points; clause percentages use the questions in that group. The bands are editorial labels, not validated benchmarks or certification thresholds. No records are independently checked by this tool.
    What does each score mean?
    0 = Not started, 1 = Initiated (talked about), 2 = In progress (partial implementation), 3 = Implemented (fully in place), 4 = Embedded (working AND verified through internal audit). Be honest — overestimating doesn't help you certify.
    What does the report contain?
    The report records your overall self-rating, its descriptive band, and the highest- and lowest-scoring clause groups. Use it alongside a separate evidence and action register; it does not establish conformity or provide a certification benchmark.
    Can this estimate certification cost or timing?
    No. Request a scoped proposal from a certification body and account separately for preparation work, locations and audit arrangements. A self-rating cannot establish the cost, schedule or outcome of an audit.