Mitti (by SafetyCulture) vs Intelex: compare scope and field workflows

The guide above contrasts the entry routes. The records add the arithmetic and what each price leaves out. Intelex Safety Essentials has a 25-user floor, which at the published rate is US$13,200 a year. Mitti Premium was shown at $24 per seat per month billed annually, the same for every team-size option, so 25 seats would come to $7,200 a year and, at the monthly rate of $29, $8,700. Read those figures as arithmetic, not as a cost comparison: the Mitti record says the page does not state which seat type the amount covers, and the two packages are not the same scope. Intelex adds other safety applications as add-ons, and Mitti separates full, lite and guest seats.

The records differ on what the product can be asked to do. Mitti documents investigations that prepare OSHA 300, 300A and 301 downloads, a training feature, and QR reporting for people without accounts, and its record lists no permit-to-work or chemical workflow. Intelex lists Permit to Work and Regulatory Permit Management as separate applications, plus Document Control with acknowledgements, nonconformance and corrective action applications, audit scheduling and a Workday gateway. The Mitti record adds a caution that applies to any tool: a completed form, an audit checklist or a training completion is not proof that work was controlled or that a person is competent.

Access works differently too. In Mitti, investigations, the API and integrations need a full seat, and the account-free QR route asks for contact details and is not shown to share the app's offline behaviour. In Intelex, the record describes licensed users of the quoted tier, an API that keeps the calling user's permissions and no login-free reporting route. If suppliers, visitors or occasional contributors must report, test that route in each product instead of assuming it.