ERA-EHS Alternatives
5 of 69 products that share a software category or a capability term with ERA-EHS, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with ERA-EHS: Chemical Safety (EMS), Evotix, SafetyStratus, Tekmon and VelocityEHS (alphabetical, not a ranking).
Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site; its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. ERA-EHS record checked 14 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the ERA-EHS profile · How candidates are matched · Already using ERA-EHS? What to check before switching
ERA-EHS's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: Environmental Management, Chemical & SDS Management and EHS Management. Offline filter: Partial offline workflow. Pricing: ERA-EHS has a published amount recorded as “H&S from USD 39/user account/year; Environmental from USD 99/emission unit/year” (check product, module and purchase scope) (model: “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”). Pricing sources checked 14 October 2026: published pricing reviewed. Trial: trial or demo on request.
- Chemical Safety (EMS)
Shares: Environmental Management, Chemical & SDS Management, EHS Management, Chemical Management and 1 more
Why listed, where it differs, against ERA-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with ERA-EHS: Environmental Management, Chemical & SDS Management and EHS Management. Tags shared with ERA-EHS: Chemical Management and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: ERA-EHS's “Container-level chemical inventory” and Chemical Safety (EMS)'s “Chemical inventory”; ERA-EHS's “SDS authoring and management” and Chemical Safety (EMS)'s “SDS management”. Pricing: Chemical Safety (EMS) and ERA-EHS both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Chemical Safety (EMS) publishes $69 per month or $699 per year for SDS Basic (1,000 SDS storage limit, no GHS labels) (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Offline filter: Chemical Safety (EMS), not yet classified; ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow. Trial: Chemical Safety (EMS), free trial documented; ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request. Conditional in Chemical Safety (EMS)'s record (2 of 8 capabilities): “Environmental regulatory reporting” and “Risk management”.
Against ERA-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Chemical Safety (EMS), “GHS labeling” and “Hazardous waste”; ERA-EHS, “Sustainability and GHG accounting” and “SOC 2 Type II” (2 of 3). Pricing model: Chemical Safety (EMS), “Published monthly and annual subscriptions by SDS plan or EMS edition; SDS Complete and the EHS Suite by quote”; ERA-EHS, “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”.
- Evotix
Shares: Chemical & SDS Management, EHS Management, Environmental Management, Chemical Management and 3 more
Why listed, where it differs, against ERA-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with ERA-EHS: Chemical & SDS Management and EHS Management. Tags shared with ERA-EHS: Environmental Management, Chemical Management, Incident Management, Audit Management and Management of Change.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Evotix, documented offline workflow; ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Evotix has no verified published paid amount recorded; ERA-EHS has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Evotix, trial status not established; ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Contractor Safety Management. Conditional in Evotix's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “SDS and chemical management” and “OSHA and RIDDOR tracking”.
Against ERA-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Risk assessments and risk registers”; ERA-EHS, “Sustainability and GHG accounting” and “SOC 2 Type II”. Pricing model: Evotix, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; ERA-EHS, “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”.
- SafetyStratus
Shares: Chemical & SDS Management, EHS Management, Incident Management and Audit Management
Why listed, where it differs, against ERA-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with ERA-EHS: Chemical & SDS Management and EHS Management. Tags shared with ERA-EHS: Incident Management and Audit Management. Capability names sharing a term: ERA-EHS's “Container-level chemical inventory” and SafetyStratus' “Chemical lifecycle records”. Offline filter: SafetyStratus and ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: SafetyStratus has no verified published paid amount recorded; ERA-EHS has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: SafetyStratus, trial status not established; ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to SafetyStratus only: Inspection Management and Permit to Work. Software categories assigned to ERA-EHS only: Environmental Management. Conditional in SafetyStratus' record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Offline inspection capture” and “SSO and user provisioning”.
Against ERA-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SafetyStratus, “Configurable inspections” and “ESG activity and data oversight”; ERA-EHS, “Sustainability and GHG accounting” and “SOC 2 Type II”. Pricing model: SafetyStratus, “Custom quote”; ERA-EHS, “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”.
- Tekmon
Shares: EHS Management, Environmental Management, Chemical Management, Incident Management and 2 more
Why listed, where it differs, against ERA-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with ERA-EHS: EHS Management. Tags shared with ERA-EHS: Environmental Management, Chemical Management, Incident Management, Audit Management and Safety Observation. Capability names sharing a term: ERA-EHS's “Air emissions modelling and reporting” and Tekmon's “GHG emissions calculation”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Tekmon, documented offline workflow; ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Tekmon has no verified published paid amount recorded; ERA-EHS has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Tekmon, free trial documented; ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Tekmon only: Quality Management Systems (QMS), Inspection Management, CMMS & Maintenance Management and Permit to Work. Conditional in Tekmon's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “ERP and reporting connections” and “CAPA assignment and approval”.
Against ERA-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Tekmon, “Permit requests and approval routing” and “Contractor prequalification, access status and certificate expiry” (2 of 10); ERA-EHS, “SOC 2 Type II”. Pricing model: Tekmon, “Enterprise subscription; custom quote”; ERA-EHS, “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”.
- VelocityEHS
Shares: Environmental Management, Chemical & SDS Management, EHS Management, Incident Management and 1 more
Why listed, where it differs, against ERA-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with ERA-EHS: Environmental Management, Chemical & SDS Management and EHS Management. Tags shared with ERA-EHS: Incident Management and Audit Management. Capability names sharing a term: ERA-EHS's “Container-level chemical inventory” and VelocityEHS's “Chemical information on mobile”; ERA-EHS's “Sustainability and GHG accounting” and VelocityEHS's “GHG and materiality”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: VelocityEHS, documented offline workflow; ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow. Pricing: VelocityEHS has no verified published paid amount recorded; ERA-EHS has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: VelocityEHS, trial status not established; ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to VelocityEHS only: Inspection Management, Ergonomics, Permit to Work and Industrial Hygiene. Conditional in VelocityEHS's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Electronic permit to work” and “Contractor qualification and self-service onboarding”.
Against ERA-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: VelocityEHS, “Scheduled inspections and finding follow-up”; ERA-EHS, “SOC 2 Type II”. Pricing model: VelocityEHS, “Request an application-specific proposal”; ERA-EHS, “Published module starting rates; enterprise quote per facility”.
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
64 more not listed. Browse the Environmental Management category.
Already using ERA-EHS? What its record leaves open
Limitations the ERA-EHS profile records:
- Starting units cannot be combined into one comparable subscription price
- Environmental emissions mapping needs vendor-assisted setup
- SDS Authoring On Demand runs from $150 down to $12 per SDS
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 14 October 2026): Imaxinar offline mobile capture. Check each against the contract you hold.
ERA-EHS evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Unit-based cost model: Count emission units, user accounts, tracked metrics and SDS before the call; each module prices on a different unit. Source
- Emissions mapping effort: Agree who maps processes, equipment and sources during setup and how changes to a process are remapped later. Source
- Data import quality: Test Universal Import and vendor uploads with your own purchase files and review the error trapping. Source
- Mobile module coverage: Get a written list of the H&S modules available offline in Imaxinar, since the page says most rather than all. Source
- Regional fit: Outside the US and Canada, confirm which local reports and regulatory lists are covered on the EU or other regional site. Source
Leaving ERA-EHS: what to plan for
- List the modules you pay for and the unit each one is priced on, because the record says the starting rates use different units and cannot be added into one platform price. Emission units, user accounts, tracked metrics and documents are priced on separate units, so ask whether modules can be ended separately and what each notice period is.
- The record says ERA sets up the initial mapping of processes, equipment and sources, and asks who remaps a process when it changes. Export the mapping documentation before leaving, since the record gives no export format for it.
- Container-level records feed reports such as Tier II. The record describes usage by container, process and location, with transfers, dispensing, waste and off-site disposal. Export the movements together with the containers they belong to, and decide how reports for the current year will be produced if the move happens part-way through it.
- Water and refrigerant records are separate modules, and the record says connected modules must be purchased separately. If you hold them, the discharge limits with revision history, laboratory results, leak-rate calculations and technician certifications are records with their own retention needs. Check what each module exports before assuming a single data pull covers them.
Who may have reason to stay with ERA-EHS
- Facilities that calculate air emissions from chemical usage and file federal and state inventory reports have the use the record names. The Tier II classifications are described as pre-selected from CAS and GHS data, with output formatted for several submission tools. A replacement has to produce the same filings from your own purchase data, and a trial should show it.
- The record separates regional coverage: the English site says its offerings focus on United States and Canadian regulation, with other sites for France, the EU and the Middle East. A team in those regions should confirm which local reports and lists are covered, and a team that files in North America should not assume a candidate covers the same ones.
- Occasional authoring of data sheets is offered per document, with a price range that runs from one figure down to another. The record does not explain what sets the price within the range, so a team that authors a few sheets a year should ask for the volumes behind each figure and compare the yearly total, not a single unit price.
- Management of change with pre-start safety review is documented as a module covering permanent and temporary changes, tasks before and after start-up, approval and training links. A site that has configured its approvals there has to match the sequence in a candidate, and the record says prerequisite checks and reconciliation need a demonstration.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for ERA-EHS
- Map two of your emission units and one coating process, and ask to see the mass-balance result flow into an inventory report and a permit report. Keep the mapping effort in view: ask who did the mapping and how long it took, since the record says set-up is vendor-assisted and a quote has to cover it.
- Import a month of your own chemical purchases and read the list of errors the import traps. The record names a general import tool and quality checks, and asks to test vendor uploads with real files, so a clean sample file proves little. Include a misspelled product and a missing unit to see what is caught.
- Capture an incident photo with the phone offline and follow what happens after reconnection. The record says most health and safety modules work offline but does not list the exceptions, so ask for the list in writing and then test the specific module you need, with the photo attached, not a generic demonstration.
- Ask to see a change in a regulatory threshold reach your reports. The record describes a master chemical and regulatory list maintained by the vendor and updated without version upgrades, so check how the change appears, who is told, and whether reports that were already filed are marked as based on the earlier values.
Conditions and sources in the ERA-EHS profile · Recorded commercial terms
ERA-EHS alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which ERA-EHS alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Chemical Safety (EMS). No verified published paid amount recorded: Evotix, SafetyStratus, Tekmon and VelocityEHS. ERA-EHS has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope.
Which ERA-EHS alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: Evotix, Tekmon and VelocityEHS. Partial offline workflow: SafetyStratus. Not yet classified: Chemical Safety (EMS). Offline filter: ERA-EHS, partial offline workflow.
Which ERA-EHS alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: Chemical Safety (EMS) and Tekmon. Trial status not established: Evotix, SafetyStratus and VelocityEHS. Trial: ERA-EHS, trial or demo on request.