Evotix Alternatives

5 of 92 products that share a software category or a capability term with Evotix, matched on what their records document.

Alternative products to investigate

Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with Evotix: Cority, EHS Hero, Intelex, Sphera and Tekmon (alphabetical, not a ranking).

Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site; its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. Evotix record checked 3 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the Evotix profile · How candidates are matched · Already using Evotix? What to check before switching

Evotix's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial

Software categories: EHS Management, Incident Management, Audit Management, Contractor Safety Management and Chemical & SDS Management. Offline filter: Documented offline workflow. Pricing: Evotix has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Scoped subscription plus implementation”). Pricing sources checked 29 September 2026: partially verified. Trial: trial status not established.

Pricing source checked.

Cority
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Risk Assessment, Permit to Work and 3 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs
Why listed: Categories shared with Evotix: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Evotix: Risk Assessment, Permit to Work, Process Safety, Management of Change and Audit Management. Capability names sharing a term: Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions” and Cority's “Audit planning and finding follow-up”; Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows” and Cority's “Incident investigation and actions”. Offline filter: Cority and Evotix, documented offline workflow. Pricing: Cority and Evotix have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Software categories assigned to Cority only: Occupational Health and Industrial Hygiene. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Cority's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Sustainability and ESG reporting” and “Contractor qualification and field oversight”.
EHS Hero
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Chemical & SDS Management and Chemical Management
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against Evotix
Why listed: Categories shared with Evotix: EHS Management, Incident Management and Chemical & SDS Management. Tags shared with Evotix: Chemical Management. Capability names sharing a term: Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions” and EHS Hero's “Audits and inspections”; Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows” and EHS Hero's “Incident and near-miss reporting and investigation”. Pricing: EHS Hero and Evotix have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: EHS Hero, not yet classified; Evotix, documented offline workflow. Trial: EHS Hero, trial or demo on request; Evotix, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Contractor Safety Management. Conditional in EHS Hero's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Regulatory updates, plan builder and training materials” and “Mobile access”.
Against Evotix: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Environmental activity records”.
Intelex
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Inspections, Permit to Work and 2 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against Evotix
Why listed: Categories shared with Evotix: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Evotix: Inspections, Permit to Work, Management of Change and Audit Management. Capability names sharing a term: Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions” and Intelex's “Nonconformance, action plans and corrective action”; Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows” and Intelex's “Incident and action workflow”. Offline filter: Intelex and Evotix, documented offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: Intelex publishes US$44/user/month for Safety Essentials; minimum 25 users, billed annually (check product, module and purchase scope); Evotix has no verified published paid amount recorded. Trial: Intelex, trial or demo on request; Evotix, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Contractor Safety Management and Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Intelex's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Native offline field capture” and “Permit to Work”.
Against Evotix: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Environmental activity records” and “Risk assessments and risk registers”. Integration capabilities: Intelex, “Permission-aware REST integration” (conditional) and “HR-system and Workday integration” (conditional).
Sphera
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Risk Assessment, Process Safety and 1 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs
Why listed: Categories shared with Evotix: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Evotix: Risk Assessment, Process Safety and Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions” and Sphera's “Corrective action follow-up”; Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows” and Sphera's “Incident intake”. Offline filter: Sphera and Evotix, documented offline workflow. Pricing: Sphera and Evotix have no verified published paid amount recorded. Fit statements of Sphera and Evotix both name enterprise.
Where it differs: Software categories assigned to Sphera only: Carbon Accounting and ESG & Sustainability Reporting. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Sphera's record: “Environmental, corporate carbon and product LCA scopes”.
Tekmon
Shares: EHS Management, Audit Management, Incident Management, Risk Assessment and 2 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against Evotix
Why listed: Categories shared with Evotix: EHS Management and Audit Management. Tags shared with Evotix: Incident Management, Risk Assessment, Environmental Management and Chemical Management. Capability names sharing a term: Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions” and Tekmon's “Configurable audit and inspection templates”; Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows” and Tekmon's “Offline inspection forms”. Offline filter: Tekmon and Evotix, documented offline workflow. Pricing: Tekmon and Evotix have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Trial: Tekmon, free trial documented; Evotix, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Tekmon only: Quality Management Systems (QMS) and CMMS & Maintenance Management. Conditional in Tekmon's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “CAPA assignment and approval” and “ISO 9001 / ISO 22000 process templates”.
Against Evotix: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Tekmon, “GHG emissions calculation” and “Supplier-based Scope 3 data collection” (2 of 5). Integration capabilities: Tekmon, “ERP and reporting connections” (conditional).

Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.

Cority alternatives EHS Hero alternatives Intelex alternatives Sphera alternatives Tekmon alternatives

87 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.

Already using Evotix? What its record leaves open

Limitations the Evotix profile records:

Enterprise capabilities cannot be assumed for Professional
Chemical and task-assessment requirements need a module-specific demonstration
Subscription pricing and implementation scope require a proposal

Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 3 October 2026): SDS and chemical management; OSHA and RIDDOR tracking; Offline chemical assessment in every edition; Voice and annotated field evidence; QR-linked safety instructions. Check each against the contract you hold.

Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):

“SDS and chemical management”: EHS Hero's “HazCom and SDS management”.

Evotix evaluation checks, for every candidate

Product and module selection: Map requirements to Professional or Enterprise before the demo. Environmental records in Professional do not establish all Enterprise chemical, health or ESG functions. Source
Report to reviewed closure: Submit a frontline finding, assign the owner and show closure evidence. Test the reviewer and escalation steps your team needs. Source
Disconnected working: Create a report offline and open a safety procedure. Reconnect and inspect attachments, duplicate handling and the record history in the quoted app. Source
Chemical and task scope: Enterprise lists SDS and chemical management. Demonstrate task, exposure and controls separately before concluding that it meets your chemical-assessment process. Source
Implementation and ongoing ownership: Request a named module list, configuration responsibilities, acceptance milestones and the separate implementation fee. Confirm support and integration assumptions. Source

Leaving Evotix: what to plan for

Begin by writing down which edition you actually run, because the vendor treats the two as separate products and the module lists differ. Permit to work, management of change and lockout and tagout appear on the larger product's page and are absent from the smaller one's list. The records you must extract, and the work you must rebuild, depend on that answer more than on any feature list.
Equipment that carries printed codes is a physical dependency at exit. If crews scan a label to reach instructions and protective-equipment guidance, the stickers point at a destination whose future you should check. Decide whether the new product can serve the same destination or whether every label is reissued, and what crews do during the gap between the two states.
Budget the destination as well as the departure. The public pages describe the set-up work here as a one-off charge alongside a subscription, so a replacement may follow the same pattern and the cost of moving belongs in the comparison. The record also publishes no subscription figure or minimum commitment, so your notice terms are known only from the proposal you signed.

Who may have reason to stay with Evotix

Teams that use the worker-concern workflow for stress, bullying or workload have something specific to preserve: the form, the linked investigations and the hotspot views by team or role. The record says detailed access controls for confidential cases are not described, so a move should be judged on how a candidate keeps those cases private, not only on whether it has a similar form.
A site that routes plant changes by type, asset and location has built a rule set that is slow to reproduce. Change requests, assigned actions and a review after the change make up one chain, and the record places it on the larger product. Dropping to a lighter form tool would lose the chain, so weigh the saving against rewriting those routes.
If regulatory output is the grievance, hold off. The pages say OSHA, RIDDOR and other regional tracking can be automated, while the edition, the classification logic, the forms produced and any electronic submission are not stated. That is an unknown rather than a failing, and a replacement may arrive with its own unknowns, so ask for the same sample incident from both.

What to test in a trial of a replacement for Evotix

Run the disconnected report exactly as the field would. Log a hazard with a photo with the network off, open a safety procedure, then reconnect and inspect the attachment, any duplicate and the history. A general mobile claim should not be taken to cover every module, so repeat the exercise for each workflow you plan to move.
Pull apart a chemical task into its pieces before accepting a demonstration. Retrieving a safety data sheet is not the same as an assessment of the task, the exposure assumptions and who among the workers can see each. Ask the candidate to show them one at a time, and ask whether the mobile app reaches that information with no signal.
Insist on a written matrix that names the edition and module for each requirement, including any chemical or sustainability scope. Then run an inspection that ends in a changed control and find out who must review that change before the finding closes. The answers show whether you are comparing like with like or a lighter edition against a fuller one.

Conditions and sources in the Evotix profile · Recorded commercial terms