Skip to main content
    QHSEtech
    Updated 24 September 2026
    Mining procurement guide

    Mining QHSE Software: Follow Field Evidence Through to Review

    Choose the mine workflow before choosing the platform: remote observations, exposure monitoring, contractor actions or a defined work-control process. A surface operation, underground site and processing plant may have different data and connectivity needs. Test those conditions directly instead of relying on a mining label.

    Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios (Founder of The QHSE Standard; product marketing at Tekmon) · Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site (disclosure) · How pages are made · LinkedIn

    Selected official product sources checked 20 September 2026; the MSHA requirements were checked against the linked regulatory texts on 24 September 2026. The demo tasks are editorial evaluation suggestions; product suitability remains to be tested.

    Define the workflows and their owners

    Remote observations and actions

    Define the location, task, crew and equipment context needed by a reviewer. Specify what field teams must prepare before losing connectivity and who follows up when records arrive.

    Exposure and specialist records

    Keep sample IDs, methods, task context and review history connected. Separate industrial-hygiene information from any clinical employee records and define who can access each.

    Contractor and shift changes

    Map how an open action or work record passes between crews, supervisors and contractors. Preserve the original report and make the receiving owner visible.

    Specialist operational systems

    Scope geotechnical analysis, blast design, fleet dispatch, fatigue modelling and tailings monitoring explicitly where required. Generic EHS capture does not establish these specialist functions.

    US mines: records the MSHA rules already require

    Underground and surface operations carry different examination, monitoring and notification duties. For a US mine, use the requirements below as the field list for the demo, then ask which application holds each record and who reviews it. They were checked against the linked eCFR text on 24 September 2026; other jurisdictions need their own review.

    RuleSettingWhat it requires
    30 CFR 57.3200Underground metal and nonmetalHazardous ground conditions are taken down or supported before other work or travel is permitted in the area; until then the area is posted and, when unattended, barricaded.
    30 CFR 75.220Underground coalThe operator develops and follows a roof control plan approved by the MSHA District Manager, suited to the geology and mining system; no plan or revision is implemented before approval.
    30 CFR 75.321Underground coalAir where persons work or travel contains at least 19.5 percent oxygen and not more than 0.5 percent carbon dioxide, with enough volume and velocity to dilute and carry away harmful gases, dusts, smoke and fumes.
    30 CFR 75.342Underground coalApproved methane monitors are fitted to face cutting, loading and other mechanized extraction equipment, calibrated at least once every 31 days, and a record of every calibration test is kept.
    30 CFR 75.402 and 75.403Underground coalUnderground areas are rock dusted to within 40 feet of working faces, and the incombustible content of the combined dust is kept at no less than 80 percent, raised 0.4 percent for each 0.1 percent of methane present.
    30 CFR 75.380, 75.1506 and 75.1507Underground coalAt least two separate and distinct escapeways are designated; refuge alternatives are provided, and the Emergency Response Plan records their type, maintenance and capacity.
    30 CFR 56.3130 and 56.3401Surface metal and nonmetalMining methods maintain wall, bank and slope stability where persons work or travel. Designated persons examine ground conditions before work, after blasting and as conditions warrant during the shift; highwalls and banks adjoining travelways are examined weekly or more often if conditions change.
    30 CFR 56.9300Surface metal and nonmetalBerms or guardrails are provided where a roadway drop-off could overturn a vehicle, at least mid-axle height of the largest self-propelled mobile equipment that usually travels the road.
    30 CFR 56.6306 and 56.6311Surface metal and nonmetalWork does not resume in the blast area until a post-blast examination by an experienced person, and faces and muck piles are examined for misfires after each blast; misfires during the shift are reported to mine management by the end of it.
    30 CFR 50.10All minesThe operator contacts MSHA immediately, and within 15 minutes, once it knows or should know of a death, an injury or entrapment with reasonable potential to cause death, or any other accident as defined in part 50.

    Respirable crystalline silica: MSHA's April 2024 final rule set a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m³ as an 8-hour time-weighted average. The Eighth Circuit stayed compliance on 11 April 2025, before the conforming amendments took effect (14 April 2025 for coal, 8 April 2026 for metal and nonmetal mines). Until the stay ends, MSHA is enforcing the silica standards that applied before the rule, and on 6 April 2026 MSHA delayed the metal and nonmetal conforming amendments indefinitely pending judicial review. Check the current status before configuring exposure records around the new limit: 89 FR 28218 (18 April 2024 final rule); Federal Register, 6 April 2026 delay notice; MSHA PIB P26-01 (9 April 2026).

    Product examples by purchasing scope

    These examples address different requirements. Use the linked sources to identify an application worth investigating, then compare candidates for the same scope. They are not a ranking or a complete market survey.

    Cority occupational health and industrial hygiene

    Cority's FAQ describes exposure monitoring, industrial-hygiene sampling, medical surveillance and clinical occupational-health records within its portfolio.

    Cority health and hygiene scope

    Investigate when: The immediate gap is exposure monitoring, hygiene sampling or specialist occupational-health records.

    Confirm in the proposed package: Demonstrate sample corrections, task or worker linkage and role separation using synthetic records. Confirm the health and hygiene applications in scope.

    Product profile and research limits →

    Enablon Control of Work

    Enablon describes permit-to-work, isolation management, shift management and simultaneous-operations applications within its Control of Work offering.

    Enablon Control of Work applications

    Investigate when: An operating area needs a defined permit, isolation and handover workflow.

    Confirm in the proposed package: Evaluate the selected Control of Work applications against the site's approved process. Do not assume the wider portfolio includes specialist mine-design or monitoring systems.

    Product profile and research limits →

    Intelex Incident Management

    Intelex describes configurable incident forms, near-miss reporting, photos and corrective-action tracking in its Incident Management application.

    Intelex Incident Management application

    Investigate when: The priority is a traceable incident or near-miss investigation with assigned actions.

    Confirm in the proposed package: Use mine locations and equipment identifiers, then hand an action to a new shift. Confirm offline entitlement, access roles and integrations in the proposed package.

    Product profile and research limits →

    Five demo tasks and the evidence to keep

    TaskScenario to runEvidence to retain
    Capture beyond network coveragePrepare a device, record an observation and photos, then reconnect.Available reference data, submission receipt and attachment completeness.
    Correct a sampling recordAmend a synthetic sample's task reference after specialist review.Original reference, reason, reviewer and impact on linked exposure records.
    Transfer an open contractor actionThe initial contractor contact leaves before the action is verified.New owner, preserved history and access after the old account is removed.
    Reconcile an equipment identifierA field observation uses a retired asset code.Visible mismatch, corrected mapping and retained original report.
    Follow a specialist-system linkRefer an observation to the separate operational system that owns the analysis.Stable cross-reference, responsible reviewer and a clear return status.

    Worked example: a sample with the wrong task reference

    Illustrative scenario: an exposure sample arrives with the correct sample ID but an outdated task code. The hygiene reviewer corrects the code. A supervisor needs to see that follow-up is pending without receiving clinical details.

    Assess traceability and access separately. Retain the original code, correction and reviewer as evidence; then test the supervisor's view and export. Keep the requirement pending if the correction cannot be reconstructed or the limited view has not been demonstrated.

    Ask for a comparable scope and quote

    Describe surface, underground, processing and remote-camp use separately where relevant to the purchase.
    Count employee, contractor, specialist, reviewer and occasional-reporter access roles.
    Name required mobile tasks, prepared reference data and connectivity assumptions for each site.
    Separate EHS, health, hygiene and work-control applications from specialist operational tools and their interfaces.
    Include data cleanup, identifier mapping, training across shifts, support arrangements and an inspectable exit export.

    How to use the evidence

    The product links establish advertised application scope. The suggested use cases, demo tasks and fictional scenario are editorial interpretations, not results of hands-on product testing or customer interviews. Confirm modules, roles, configuration and commercial terms in the actual proposal.

    Record each required task as demonstrated, partial, unmet or untested. Retain the application and configuration used, the evidence observed and the owner of any follow-up. Keep essential unresolved requirements visible before accepting the pilot.

    Use the worked buying examples to turn those observations into a requirements record, comparable quote and pilot decision. Read our editorial methodology for the wider research approach.

    Turn the demo into a recorded decision

    Give relevant candidates the same tasks, capture the evidence and assign an owner to each unresolved requirement.

    Open the demo scorecard

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Does a mining QHSE platform include tailings or blast-management tools?
    Not on the basis of a general mining or EHS description. Name the specialist analysis, monitoring and approval functions required and request separate evidence for the proposed application.
    Can it support rotating or contractor crews?
    Test role changes, open-action transfer, preparation for disconnected work and account removal. Crew rostering and fatigue modelling are additional scopes to establish if required.
    Does offline capture prove a full remote-site workflow?
    No. Test prepared information, the exact field task, synchronisation and the downstream review. Notifications and current server status may have separate connectivity requirements.
    Are statutory mining reports included?
    No jurisdiction-specific reporting coverage is established by this guide. Ask the responsible reporting specialists to identify required fields, classifications, review and submission outputs, then test the named application.
    How do we budget for deployment?
    Use proposals with the same sites, applications, roles, data work and interfaces. Require a representative pilot and acceptance milestones rather than a generic mining price or timetable.