CORE-EHS Alternatives
5 of 81 products that share a software category or a capability term with CORE-EHS, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with CORE-EHS: Cority, Evotix, SMS360, Synergi Life (DNV) and Tekmon (alphabetical, not a ranking).
Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site; its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. CORE-EHS record checked 11 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the CORE-EHS profile · How candidates are matched · Already using CORE-EHS? What to check before switching
CORE-EHS's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management and Contractor Safety Management. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: CORE-EHS has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Contact vendor”). Pricing sources checked 2 October 2026: partially verified. Trial: trial status not established.
- Cority
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management and Risk Assessment
Why listed, where it differs, against CORE-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with CORE-EHS: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Tags shared with CORE-EHS: Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle” and Cority's “Electronic permit to work”; CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations” and Cority's “Incident investigation and actions”. Pricing: Cority and CORE-EHS have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Cority, documented offline workflow; CORE-EHS, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Cority only: Occupational Health and Environmental Management. Conditional in Cority's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Sustainability and ESG reporting” and “Contractor qualification and field oversight”.
Against CORE-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Cority, “Offline field capture” and “Environmental obligations”. Pricing model: Cority, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”.
- Evotix
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Contractor Safety Management, Permit to Work and 1 more
Why listed, where it differs, against CORE-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with CORE-EHS: EHS Management, Incident Management and Contractor Safety Management. Tags shared with CORE-EHS: Permit to Work and Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle” and Evotix's “Enterprise permit, change and isolation modules”; CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations” and Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows”. Pricing: Evotix and CORE-EHS have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Evotix, documented offline workflow; CORE-EHS, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Evotix's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “SDS and chemical management” and “OSHA and RIDDOR tracking”.
Against CORE-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Environmental activity records”; CORE-EHS, “Training and competency lifecycle”. Pricing model: Evotix, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”.
- SMS360
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management and Risk Assessment
Why listed, where it differs, against CORE-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with CORE-EHS: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Tags shared with CORE-EHS: Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle” and SMS360's “Work permits”; CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations” and SMS360's “Incident capture, investigation and corrective actions”. Pricing: SMS360 and CORE-EHS have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Software categories assigned to SMS360 only: Driver & Fleet Safety. Software categories assigned to CORE-EHS only: Contractor Safety Management. Conditional in SMS360's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Compliance, training, observations and safety data sheets” and “Actions, management of change, claims and document library”.
Against CORE-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SMS360, “Lockout/tagout” and “Fleet360 driver, vehicle and accident records” (2 of 3); CORE-EHS, “Contractor oversight”. Pricing model: SMS360, “Quote-based subscription; unlimited users stated; tiers by employee count and storage”; CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”. Integration capabilities: SMS360, “Integrations, API and security attestations” (unverified). Access, security and record controls: SMS360, “Mobile, offline, languages and single sign-on” (documented).
- Synergi Life (DNV)
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management
Why listed, where it differs, against CORE-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with CORE-EHS: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle” and Synergi Life (DNV)'s “Permit management”; CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations” and Synergi Life (DNV)'s “Incident investigation and corrective follow-up”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Synergi Life (DNV), partial offline workflow; CORE-EHS, not yet classified. Pricing: Synergi Life (DNV) publishes EUR 7,000 per year (Entry 5 user pack, VAT not included, annual billing) (check product, module and purchase scope); CORE-EHS has no verified published paid amount recorded. Trial: Synergi Life (DNV), free trial documented; CORE-EHS, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Synergi Life (DNV) only: Process Safety Management and Environmental Management. Conditional in Synergi Life (DNV)'s record: “Disconnected field reporting” and “Public anonymous reporting”.
Against CORE-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Synergi Life (DNV), “Environmental performance records”; CORE-EHS, “Inspection-to-verified closure” and “Training and competency lifecycle”. Pricing model: Synergi Life (DNV), “Custom quote; published entry plans for the risk-management starter pack”; CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”.
- Tekmon
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Risk Assessment
Why listed, where it differs, against CORE-EHS
Why listed: Categories shared with CORE-EHS: EHS Management and Permit to Work. Tags shared with CORE-EHS: Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle” and Tekmon's “Permit requests and approval routing”; CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations” and Tekmon's “Incident capture, routing and follow-up”. Pricing: Tekmon and CORE-EHS have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Tekmon, documented offline workflow; CORE-EHS, not yet classified. Trial: Tekmon, free trial documented; CORE-EHS, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Tekmon only: Quality Management Systems (QMS) and CMMS & Maintenance Management. Conditional in Tekmon's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “CAPA assignment and approval” and “ISO 9001 / ISO 22000 process templates”.
Against CORE-EHS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Tekmon, “GHG emissions calculation” and “Supplier-based Scope 3 data collection” (2 of 7). Pricing model: Tekmon, “Enterprise subscription; custom quote”; CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”. Integration capabilities: Tekmon, “ERP and reporting connections” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Tekmon, “Document library with history and access control” (documented).
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
76 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.
Already using CORE-EHS? What its record leaves open
Limitations the CORE-EHS profile records:
- No verified numeric software pricing
- Offline permit authorization remains unverified
- Software and professional services need separate scoping
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 11 October 2026): Isolation and risk checks; Cross-site EHS reporting. Check each against the contract you hold.
Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):
- “Isolation and risk checks”: Evotix's “Enterprise permit, change and isolation modules”.
CORE-EHS evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Functional depth: Test permit authorization, suspension and closure using actual site procedures. Source
- Usability & adoption: Observe reporter and approver roles separately on the intended devices. Source
- Implementation & TCO: Separate named products, implementation, support and professional services. Source
- Integrations & API: Require an interface specification and proof of shared identifiers between proposed products.
- Security & trust: Validate authorization roles, record history and security evidence for the actual deployment.
Leaving CORE-EHS: what to plan for
- Permits are hard to move in flight. The permit product covers requests, authorisation, status tracking and closure, and its authorisation history is the evidence an investigation would ask for. Choose a cutover that lets open permits close in the old system, retain the full history for each permit, including who approved and what isolation checks were recorded, and issue new permits only in the replacement.
- Work out which named products you actually use. The record lists EHS360 as the broad platform and CORE e-PTW, IRIS, CSM 360, InspectSafe360, HIRAC, Skill Hub, Safety Audit and Asset Integrity as separately named products or modules, with inclusion, shared records and packaging to be confirmed in a proposal. Consulting, staffing and training are separate services from the software, so ending one does not end the other.
- Contractor and risk data have to be rebuilt as well as exported. Contractors went through pre-qualification, onboarding and training, so their expiry dates and renewal reminders need to reach the new system or they will lapse unnoticed. Risk matrices, scoring rules and approval gates are configurable here; export your definitions and the residual-risk logic as written rules, since the replacement may not reproduce them by default.
Who may have reason to stay with CORE-EHS
- The record points to industrial teams whose main need is traceable work authorisation with follow-up. If your permits depend on an approval that cannot be given while an isolation verification is missing, and you have watched that rule work on your own procedures, it is a proven behaviour, and a replacement has to be shown to block the same approval before you rely on it.
- Offline permit approval is unproven here, which cuts both ways. The portfolio advertises offline scanning, capture and signing, while the permit page establishes mobile access only. If connectivity is your reason for leaving, ask each candidate for a list of operations that are blocked when the connection is lost, for permits specifically, instead of a general offline claim.
- The links between modules are the value if you use them. A contractor record, a permit and an incident are meant to share identifiers, and the bow-tie product describes connections to incident data. Several EHS360 modules in one plant mean that a move splits records that currently trace to each other, so a candidate should be tested on that trace and not on each module alone.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for CORE-EHS
- Test permit authorisation under fault conditions. Load a sample high-risk task, leave an isolation check incomplete and try to approve it with a test account, then disconnect the device and note which transitions are still allowed, reconnect and read the authorisation history before closing the permit. A feature list cannot show whether an unsafe job can be authorised.
- Follow a contractor through to an incident. Create a contractor with a training requirement, link the contractor to a proposed permit, record a related incident, and trace the shared identifiers, assigned actions and the final export across everything on the quote. If the candidate sells these as separate modules, require an interface specification and proof of shared identifiers.
- Put your own risk method into a risk assessment. Enter hazards for equipment, activity and environment, apply your own severity and likelihood criteria and look at how the rating is computed, choose controls by the hierarchy, assign owners and dates, submit for review, then attach closure evidence and check the residual-risk calculation and the approval history. Ask for software, implementation and services on separate lines.
Conditions and sources in the CORE-EHS profile · Recorded commercial terms
CORE-EHS alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which CORE-EHS alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Synergi Life (DNV). No verified published paid amount recorded: Cority, Evotix, SMS360 and Tekmon. CORE-EHS has no verified published paid amount recorded.
Which CORE-EHS alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: Cority, Evotix and Tekmon. Partial offline workflow: Synergi Life (DNV). Not yet classified: SMS360. Offline filter: CORE-EHS, not yet classified.
Which CORE-EHS alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: Synergi Life (DNV) and Tekmon. Trial status not established: Cority, Evotix and SMS360. Trial: CORE-EHS, trial status not established.