IAMTech iPermit Alternatives
5 of 22 products that share a software category or a capability term with IAMTech iPermit, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Products whose records share the most documented attributes with IAMTech iPermit: Cority, Enablon, Pisys Permit to Work, Safetymint and Tekmon (alphabetical, not a ranking).
Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site; its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. IAMTech iPermit record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the IAMTech iPermit profile · How candidates are matched · Already using IAMTech iPermit? What to check before switching
IAMTech iPermit's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: Control of Work and Permit to Work. Offline filter: Partial offline workflow. Pricing: IAMTech iPermit publishes GBP15,000/year, Small package with up to 10 named users (check product, module and purchase scope) (model: “Published annual package bands”). Pricing sources checked 2 October 2026: published pricing reviewed. Trial: trial status not established.
- Cority
Shares: Permit to Work, Risk Assessment and Contractor Management
Why listed, where it differs, against IAMTech iPermit
Why listed: Categories shared with IAMTech iPermit: Permit to Work. Tags shared with IAMTech iPermit: Risk Assessment and Contractor Management. Capability names sharing a term: IAMTech iPermit's “Permit lifecycle governance” and Cority's “Electronic permit to work”; IAMTech iPermit's “Audit, inspection and corrective action” and Cority's “Audit planning and finding follow-up”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Cority, documented offline workflow; IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Cority has no verified published paid amount recorded; IAMTech iPermit has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Software categories assigned to Cority only: EHS Management, Occupational Health, Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Management. Software categories assigned to IAMTech iPermit only: Control of Work. Conditional in Cority's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Sustainability and ESG reporting” and “Contractor qualification and field oversight”.
Against IAMTech iPermit: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Cority, “Environmental obligations”; IAMTech iPermit, “SIMOPS, MOPO and anti-clash checks” and “Gas testing and atmospheric monitoring” (2 of 6). Pricing model: Cority, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; IAMTech iPermit, “Published annual package bands”.
- Enablon
Shares: Control of Work, Permit to Work, Risk Assessment and Contractor Management
Why listed, where it differs, against IAMTech iPermit
Why listed: Categories shared with IAMTech iPermit: Control of Work and Permit to Work. Tags shared with IAMTech iPermit: Risk Assessment and Contractor Management. Capability names sharing a term: IAMTech iPermit's “Audit, inspection and corrective action” and Enablon's “Mobile inspection and action-plan capture”; IAMTech iPermit's “Incident investigation links” and Enablon's “Integrated quality, incident, nonconformance and CAPA management”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Enablon, documented offline workflow; IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Enablon has no verified published paid amount recorded; IAMTech iPermit has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Software categories assigned to Enablon only: EHS Management, Environmental Management and Process Safety Management. Conditional in Enablon's record (2 of 8 capabilities): “Permit, isolation and risk-assessment workflows” and “Simultaneous-operations coordination”.
Against IAMTech iPermit: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Enablon, “EHS and environmental applications”; IAMTech iPermit, “SIMOPS, MOPO and anti-clash checks” and “Competency verification” (2 of 5). Pricing model: Enablon, “Request a scoped proposal”; IAMTech iPermit, “Published annual package bands”. Integration capabilities: Enablon, “Integrated quality, incident, nonconformance and CAPA management” (documented) and “External integration tooling” (documented); IAMTech iPermit, “SSO and enterprise integration” (conditional).
- Pisys Permit to Work
Shares: Control of Work, Permit to Work, Risk Assessment and Contractor Management
Why listed, where it differs, against IAMTech iPermit
Why listed: Categories shared with IAMTech iPermit: Control of Work and Permit to Work. Tags shared with IAMTech iPermit: Risk Assessment and Contractor Management. Capability names sharing a term: IAMTech iPermit's “Permit lifecycle governance” and Pisys Permit to Work's “Permit board”; IAMTech iPermit's “Isolation and LOTO control” and Pisys Permit to Work's “Isolations”. Offline filter: Pisys Permit to Work and IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: Pisys Permit to Work has no verified published paid amount recorded; IAMTech iPermit has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Pisys Permit to Work, trial or demo on request; IAMTech iPermit, trial status not established. Conditional in Pisys Permit to Work's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Mobile completion” and “Maximo linkage”.
Against IAMTech iPermit: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: IAMTech iPermit, “Competency verification” and “Gas testing and atmospheric monitoring” (2 of 6). Pricing model: Pisys Permit to Work, “Custom quote”; IAMTech iPermit, “Published annual package bands”. Integration capabilities: Pisys Permit to Work, “Pisys PTW API” (conditional); IAMTech iPermit, “SSO and enterprise integration” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Pisys Permit to Work, “Access and retention” (documented) and “Permit audit trail and linked records” (documented).
- Safetymint
Shares: Permit to Work
Why listed, where it differs, against IAMTech iPermit
Why listed: Categories shared with IAMTech iPermit: Permit to Work. Capability names sharing a term: IAMTech iPermit's “Permit lifecycle governance” and Safetymint's “Permit administration”; IAMTech iPermit's “Audit, inspection and corrective action” and Safetymint's “Inspection review”. Offline filter: Safetymint and IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Safetymint and IAMTech iPermit both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Safetymint publishes $9,000/year for one module including 10 user licenses (USD) (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: Safetymint, free trial documented; IAMTech iPermit, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to IAMTech iPermit only: Control of Work. Conditional in Safetymint's record (2 of 7 capabilities): “Control-of-work linkage” and “Offline capture”.
Against IAMTech iPermit: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: IAMTech iPermit, “SIMOPS, MOPO and anti-clash checks” and “Competency verification” (2 of 6). Pricing model: Safetymint, “Annual module and user calculator; Enterprise quote”; IAMTech iPermit, “Published annual package bands”.
- Tekmon
Shares: Permit to Work, Risk Assessment and Contractor Management
Why listed, where it differs, against IAMTech iPermit
Why listed: Categories shared with IAMTech iPermit: Permit to Work. Tags shared with IAMTech iPermit: Risk Assessment and Contractor Management. Capability names sharing a term: IAMTech iPermit's “Permit lifecycle governance” and Tekmon's “Permit requests and approval routing”; IAMTech iPermit's “Audit, inspection and corrective action” and Tekmon's “Configurable audit and inspection templates”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Tekmon, documented offline workflow; IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Tekmon has no verified published paid amount recorded; IAMTech iPermit has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Tekmon, free trial documented; IAMTech iPermit, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Tekmon only: EHS Management, Quality Management Systems (QMS) and CMMS & Maintenance Management. Software categories assigned to IAMTech iPermit only: Control of Work. Conditional in Tekmon's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “CAPA assignment and approval” and “ISO 9001 / ISO 22000 process templates”.
Against IAMTech iPermit: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Tekmon, “Cross-discipline quality and safety CAPA” and “CAPA and quality records” (2 of 13); IAMTech iPermit, “Competency verification” and “Gas testing and atmospheric monitoring” (2 of 4). Pricing model: Tekmon, “Enterprise subscription; custom quote”; IAMTech iPermit, “Published annual package bands”. Integration capabilities: Tekmon, “ERP and reporting connections” (conditional); IAMTech iPermit, “SSO and enterprise integration” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Tekmon, “Document library with history and access control” (documented).
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
17 more not listed. Browse the Control of Work category.
Already using IAMTech iPermit? What its record leaves open
Limitations the IAMTech iPermit profile records:
- Offline claims differ between official sources
- Named-user and permit-volume limits affect the entry package
- Integration, installation and training conditions require reconciliation with the proposal
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Offline field access; SSO and enterprise integration; AI-assisted oversight. Check each against the contract you hold.
IAMTech iPermit evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Functional depth: Demonstrate a conflicting job and trace the rejected transition through its resolution. Source
- Usability & adoption: Observe an issuer, contractor and incoming shift using their own roles. Source
- Implementation & TCO: Compare subscription, configuration, migration, training and renewal costs for the same deployment. Source
- Integrations & API: Test a failed interface transaction and verify ownership of recovery and duplicate prevention. Source
- Security & trust: Request hosting, access, retention and recovery evidence for the contracted service. Source
Leaving IAMTech iPermit: what to plan for
- Never cut over with permits still live. The record describes a lifecycle from draft through issue, suspension, handover and closure, with isolations linked to permits, so a changeover date needs every open permit closed or deliberately carried across, and every applied isolation represented in the new system. Export attribution, signature and transition history for closed permits, since approvals, modifications and handovers are tied to named users.
- Inventory what your key users configured. The record says trained key users adjust permit, isolation and JSA types, hierarchy, users, access and templates, and that custom development is estimated separately. Write down each permit type, approval chain and conflict rule in plain language, plus the interfaces to SAP PM, Maximo, HR and Active Directory, and check which data lives only here, since the record keeps the ERP as system of record.
- Treat hosting and exit terms as a checklist for the old contract. The record advertises annual packages, lists on-premise installation as an add-on and tells buyers to get taxes, migration, implementation and renewal terms in writing. Ask what supports retention, data location and exit export, and how long permit records must stay retrievable under your own procedures before cancelling anything.
Who may have reason to stay with IAMTech iPermit
- The offline limits are explicit, which makes them testable. The record allows cached viewing and queued gas readings, notes and photos, while permit issuance, approval, suspension, handover, closure, isolation sign-off and gas-test authorisation need a live connection. If crews cannot authorise work without a signal, check whether your site rules would permit that at all, since a different product would not change the rules, and note that brochure wording is broader.
- Conflict rules are the hardest thing to reproduce. The record describes rules that detect location, equipment, isolation and time-window conflicts, shown on maps or plot plans, and asks who owns SIMOPS and MOPO configuration and how rule changes are approved. If your office has tuned those rules over several seasons, a replacement means re-deriving and re-approving them, which can outweigh a price or interface complaint.
- Look at the band before blaming the vendor. The UK Small package is described with up to 10 named users and a monthly permit allowance, and the record lists named-user and permit-volume limits as affecting the entry package. If occasional approvers are filling named seats, trimming them may change the tier, whereas a move would reopen discovery, migration and training costs for every user.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for IAMTech iPermit
- Create a work order and permit, attach a risk assessment and a shared isolation, then try to issue the permit before mandatory controls are complete and try to de-isolate while a linked permit is live. A candidate that blocks neither is a finding in itself. Finish by issuing, suspending, resuming, handing over and closing with the correct roles, and read back the full transition history.
- Synchronise a field device, take it offline, then suspend or update the permit from a connected account, and note the banner, last-sync time and the age at which cached data is flagged. For this product that threshold is 30 minutes. Try every state-changing action offline and queue only readings, notes or photos, then reconnect and reconcile. Ask how revocation reaches a stale device.
- Get implementation estimates as milestones rather than a duration. The record cites both two-to-four-week and six-to-eight-week statements, and says complex multi-site examples can take longer, so a candidate's figure should be tied to discovery, configuration, migration, interface testing, training and acceptance. Include user-acceptance tests for successful, rejected, retried and duplicate interface transactions, with named owners for recovery.
Conditions and sources in the IAMTech iPermit profile · Recorded commercial terms
IAMTech iPermit alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which IAMTech iPermit alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Safetymint. No verified published paid amount recorded: Cority, Enablon, Pisys Permit to Work and Tekmon. IAMTech iPermit has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope.
Which IAMTech iPermit alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: Cority, Enablon and Tekmon. Partial offline workflow: Pisys Permit to Work and Safetymint. Offline filter: IAMTech iPermit, partial offline workflow.
Which IAMTech iPermit alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: Safetymint and Tekmon. Trial or demo on request: Pisys Permit to Work. Trial status not established: Cority and Enablon. Trial: IAMTech iPermit, trial status not established.