IntegrityNext Alternatives
5 of 12 products that share a software category or a capability term with IntegrityNext, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with IntegrityNext: EUDR Passport, Exiger, Fair Supply, iPRO and osapiens HUB (alphabetical, not a ranking).
IntegrityNext record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the IntegrityNext profile · How candidates are matched · Already using IntegrityNext? What to check before switching
IntegrityNext's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: IntegrityNext has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”). Trial: trial status not established.
- EUDR Passport
Shares: Supply Chain Due Diligence and EUDR Compliance
Why listed, where it differs, against IntegrityNext
Why listed: Categories shared with IntegrityNext: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Tags shared with IntegrityNext: EUDR Compliance. Capability names sharing a term: IntegrityNext's “Supply chain due diligence” and EUDR Passport's “EUDR due diligence”; IntegrityNext's “EUDR due diligence” and EUDR Passport's “Guided due diligence process”.
Where it differs: Pricing: EUDR Passport has a published amount recorded as “From €90 per product profile per year” (check product, module and purchase scope); IntegrityNext has no verified published paid amount recorded. Conditional in EUDR Passport's record: “Reference number validity checks”.
Against IntegrityNext: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: EUDR Passport, “Risk assessment and resolution modules” and “Statement filing and authorised-representative option”; IntegrityNext, “LkSG and Norwegian Transparency Act support” and “Integrations and platform hosting”. Pricing model: EUDR Passport, “Per product profile, annual”; IntegrityNext, “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”.
- Exiger
Shares: Supply Chain Due Diligence, Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation
Why listed, where it differs, against IntegrityNext
Why listed: Categories shared with IntegrityNext: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Tags shared with IntegrityNext: Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation. Capability names sharing a term: IntegrityNext's “Supply chain due diligence” and Exiger's “Forced labour supply chain mapping”; IntegrityNext's “EUDR due diligence” and Exiger's “Third-party due diligence workflow”. Pricing: Exiger and IntegrityNext have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Conditional in Exiger's record: “UFLPA-specific forced labour mapping” and “Product-level modern slavery data and integrations”.
Against IntegrityNext: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Exiger, “Security certifications”. Pricing model: Exiger, “Quote-based”; IntegrityNext, “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”.
- Fair Supply
Shares: Supply Chain Due Diligence, Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation
Why listed, where it differs, against IntegrityNext
Why listed: Categories shared with IntegrityNext: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Tags shared with IntegrityNext: Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation. Capability names sharing a term: IntegrityNext's “Supply chain due diligence” and Fair Supply's “Supplier due diligence and remediation tracking”; IntegrityNext's “Multilingual supplier questionnaires and corrective actions” and Fair Supply's “Supplier self-assessment questionnaires and scoring”. Pricing: Fair Supply and IntegrityNext have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Conditional in Fair Supply's record: “Modelled multi-tier risk from names and spend”.
Against IntegrityNext: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Fair Supply, “Versioned audit trail” and “Information security certification”; IntegrityNext, “Forced labour screening and monitoring” and “LkSG and Norwegian Transparency Act support” (2 of 3). Pricing model: Fair Supply, “Quote-based”; IntegrityNext, “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”.
- iPRO
Shares: Supply Chain Due Diligence, Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation
Why listed, where it differs, against IntegrityNext
Why listed: Categories shared with IntegrityNext: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Tags shared with IntegrityNext: Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence and Supplier Evaluation. Capability names sharing a term: IntegrityNext's “Multilingual supplier questionnaires and corrective actions” and iPRO's “Questionnaire-based assessment of organisation and suppliers”. Pricing: iPRO and IntegrityNext have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Conditional in iPRO's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Statement support by jurisdiction” and “Supplier risk profiles and draft statement”.
Against IntegrityNext: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: iPRO, “Information security certification”; IntegrityNext, “Forced labour screening and monitoring”. Pricing model: iPRO, “Quote-based”; IntegrityNext, “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”.
- osapiens HUB
Shares: Supply Chain Due Diligence, Supplier Due Diligence and EUDR Compliance
Why listed, where it differs, against IntegrityNext
Why listed: Categories shared with IntegrityNext: Supply Chain Due Diligence. Tags shared with IntegrityNext: Supplier Due Diligence and EUDR Compliance. Capability names sharing a term: IntegrityNext's “Supply chain due diligence” and osapiens HUB's “EUDR due diligence”; IntegrityNext's “Multilingual supplier questionnaires and corrective actions” and osapiens HUB's “Supplier questionnaires and risk”. Pricing: osapiens HUB and IntegrityNext have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: osapiens HUB, documented offline workflow; IntegrityNext, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to osapiens HUB only: Carbon Accounting and Audit Management. Conditional in osapiens HUB's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Product carbon footprints” and “Reporting and disclosure preparation”.
Against IntegrityNext: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: osapiens HUB, “Corporate carbon data collection” and “Offline mobile audits” (2 of 4); IntegrityNext, “LkSG and Norwegian Transparency Act support”. Pricing model: osapiens HUB, “Contact vendor”; IntegrityNext, “Quote-based; EUDR Starter at a fixed annual price”.
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
7 more not listed. Browse the Supply Chain Due Diligence category.
Already using IntegrityNext? What its record leaves open
Limitations the IntegrityNext profile records:
- Modern slavery statement workflow needs a demo
- Pricing is not published
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Product-based supply chain mapping. Check each against the contract you hold.
Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):
- “Product-based supply chain mapping”: Exiger's “Forced labour supply chain mapping”.
IntegrityNext evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Modern slavery content within a multi-law platform: Ask to see the forced labour and modern slavery assessment questions and outputs separately from LkSG content. Check which are configurable and what a statement section would contain. Source
- Screening data and false positives: The forced labor page cites the UFLPA Entity List, sanctions data and news monitoring. Run a test list, record matches and how a reviewer clears or escalates a false match, and keep the decision record. Source
- Supplier questionnaire burden: The pages describe 14-language questionnaires and a free supplier experience for the EUDR product. Ask whether suppliers pay in any case, how many questions they answer and how responses are reused across customers. Source
- Sub-tier mapping input requirements: The visibility page refers to product data with HS codes, DUNS numbers and NACE classes. Test with a real product list and measure how many sub-tier links are confirmed rather than modelled. Source
- Corrective action and complaints records: Raise a test finding and follow it through assignment, evidence and closure. Check for a complaints procedure record under the LkSG content, and export the resulting audit trail. Source
- Legal validation, implementation and pricing: The LkSG and NTA pages state a typical 6 to 8 week project and a legal opinion for the NTA. Ask for the opinion, the implementation plan and written pricing, including EUDR Starter limits beyond 50 suppliers. Source
Conditions and sources in the IntegrityNext profile · Recorded commercial terms
IntegrityNext alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which IntegrityNext alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): EUDR Passport. No verified published paid amount recorded: Exiger, Fair Supply, iPRO and osapiens HUB. IntegrityNext has no verified published paid amount recorded.
Which IntegrityNext alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: osapiens HUB. Not yet classified: EUDR Passport, Exiger, Fair Supply and iPRO. Offline filter: IntegrityNext, not yet classified.
Which IntegrityNext alternatives document a free trial?
Trial status not established: EUDR Passport, Exiger, Fair Supply, iPRO and osapiens HUB. Trial: IntegrityNext, trial status not established.