Skip to main content
    qhsetech.com

    Exiger

    Exiger's 1Exiger platform covers supply chain risk, third-party risk management and due diligence. Its modern slavery article describes a knowledge graph of suppliers and third parties mapped to products down to raw materials, forced labour data, and sub-tier visibility beyond Tier 1.

    Evidence: Researched profile

    Built from vendor sources checked ; AI-assisted drafting. Documentation review, not a hands-on test. How pages are made

    Vendor website
    More

    Who is Exiger for?

    Large organisations and public-sector buyers needing sub-tier forced labour mapping inside a broader supply chain risk programme. A broad enterprise risk platform; modern slavery statement preparation, remediation records and worker channels need to be demonstrated rather than assumed.

    Watch for: Enterprise scope; statement workflow needs a demo.

    Sources checked .

    Capabilities and scope

    Exiger provides the 1Exiger supply chain and third-party risk platform. This profile covers its forced labour and modern slavery supply chain mapping use.

    Exiger capabilities, evidence status and source links
    CapabilityEvidenceScope and source
    Forced labour supply chain mappingDocumented by vendor

    The vendor's article describes a knowledge graph representing suppliers and third parties and mapping products down to raw materials, combined with forced labour and supply chain data.

    Modern slavery tools article
    Nth-tier supplier identification and risk scoringDocumented by vendor

    The supply chain risk page states that the platform identifies nth-tier suppliers, applies risk scores and traces their data sources, with dashboards and ongoing monitoring. It does not give the tier depth achieved for a given product category, so test this with your own bill of materials.

    Exiger supply chain risk management, checked 30 September 2026
    UFLPA-specific forced labour mappingDepends on scope

    The UFLPA page describes four steps: risk source identification, network mapping, scoring and tagging, and continuous monitoring, using Chinese government, geospatial and trade data. Its stated scope is Xinjiang and related Chinese supply chains for US importers, so check coverage for other regions and regimes.

    Exiger enhanced UFLPA solution, checked 30 September 2026
    Third-party due diligence workflowDocumented by vendor

    The due diligence page lists sanctions, modern slavery, adverse media and other checks, risk profiles organised by risk event, configurable rules and a record of decisions, with analysts reviewing. Confirm what a modern slavery finding looks like in a record and who performs the review.

    Exiger due diligence solutions, checked 30 September 2026
    Product-level modern slavery data and integrationsDepends on scope

    The risk and compliance page describes product-aware datasets linking products to input-level origin, facilities and owners, and an API-first approach with native ERP, source-to-pay and case system integrations. Verify which integrations are available for your systems and which data modules are in your contract.

    Exiger risk and compliance, checked 30 September 2026
    Security certificationsDocumented by vendor

    The risk and compliance page states FedRAMP Moderate authorisation, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2. Request current reports and confirm which deployment they cover.

    Exiger risk and compliance, checked 30 September 2026

    Exiger pricing

    Quote-based

    Separate pricing recheck date not recorded. Confirm current pricing with the vendor.

    Which product scope should the quote cover?

    Supply chain risk, third-party risk and due diligence on the 1Exiger platform; software supply chain security is a separate product.

    Ask the vendor to identify the product, region, modules, billing unit, contract term and included services in writing.

    Offline work and integrations

    Not applicable in the usual sense: Exiger is a web platform for supplier risk assessment and reporting, and no offline or mobile field mode is documented on the reviewed pages.

    What we could not verify

    2 depend on scope · 1 note

    Demo script

    Proposed demo: bill of materials to evidenced forced labour flag

    1. Provide a sample product bill of materials and supplier list covering at least three tiers.
    2. Review the map, noting which tiers and links are inferred rather than confirmed.
    3. Open a flagged entity, inspect its evidence and record a reviewer decision.
    4. Trace the finding to an action and to the statement or disclosure it would support; export the audit record.

    Ask the vendor to show you

    1. Which data do suppliers need to provide, and what is scored from spend and supplier names alone?
    2. How does the platform capture signals that contradict a supplier's own questionnaire answers?
    3. How is a finding linked to a remediation action and to the sentence in the published statement?
    4. Which jurisdictions' reporting criteria are mapped (UK, Australia, Canada, EU), and who maintains that mapping?

    Checks specific to this product

    Sub-tier depth on your own products:
    Supply a sample bill of materials and ask the vendor to map it. Record the tiers reached, how many entities are resolved and which links are inferred. Keep the output for comparison with supplier-confirmed data.
    Forced labour data scope and geography:
    The UFLPA page is scoped to Xinjiang and Chinese networks for US importers. Ask which datasets apply to the UK, Australian, Canadian and EU regimes and which regions are not covered.
    Evidence for a flagged entity:
    Select a flagged supplier and ask for the evidence chain behind the flag, including data source and date. Check whether a reviewer can record a decision that stays with the record.
    Statement and remediation workflow:
    The pages reviewed describe risk findings and alert workflows rather than modern slavery statement drafting. Ask for a demonstration of how a finding becomes an action and a sentence in a published statement, or confirm this is out of scope.
    Use demo checklist

    Sources

    7 sources, checked

    Reviews on qhsetech.com

    Star ratings and review counts from the old catalog are not shown: no source for them was recorded.