Skip to main content
    QHSEtech

    Exiger

    Exiger's 1Exiger platform covers supply chain risk, third-party risk management and due diligence. Its modern slavery article describes a knowledge graph of suppliers and third parties mapped to products down to raw materials, forced labour data, and sub-tier visibility beyond Tier 1.

    Evidence: Researched profile

    Built from vendor sources checked ; AI-assisted drafting. Documentation review, not a hands-on test. How pages are made

    Who is Exiger for?

    Large organisations and public-sector buyers needing sub-tier forced labour mapping inside a broader supply chain risk programme. A broad enterprise risk platform; modern slavery statement preparation, remediation records and worker channels need to be demonstrated rather than assumed.

    Watch for: Enterprise scope; statement workflow needs a demo.

    Sources checked .

    Product tour

    Vendor visuals—not a QHSEtech hands-on test.

    Browser window showing an Exiger risk profile for Company X with top contributing risks and sanctions results

    Due diligence risk profile (sample company)

    Source

    Capabilities and scope

    Exiger provides the 1Exiger supply chain and third-party risk platform. This profile covers its forced labour and modern slavery supply chain mapping use. The about page states a 2013 founding and names no owner.

    Exiger capabilities, evidence status and source links
    CapabilityEvidenceScope and source
    Forced labour supply chain mappingDocumented by vendor

    The vendor's article describes a knowledge graph representing suppliers and third parties and mapping products down to raw materials, combined with forced labour and supply chain data.

    Modern slavery tools article, checked 2 October 2026
    Nth-tier supplier identification and risk scoringDocumented by vendor

    The supply chain risk page states that the platform identifies nth-tier suppliers, applies risk scores and traces their data sources, with dashboards and ongoing monitoring. It does not give the tier depth achieved for a given product category, so test this with your own bill of materials.

    Exiger supply chain risk management, checked 2 October 2026
    UFLPA-specific forced labour mappingDepends on scope

    The UFLPA page describes four steps: risk source identification, network mapping, scoring and tagging, and continuous monitoring, using Chinese government, geospatial and trade data. Its stated scope is Xinjiang and related Chinese supply chains for US importers, so check coverage for other regions and regimes.

    Exiger enhanced UFLPA solution, checked 2 October 2026
    Third-party due diligence workflowDocumented by vendor

    The due diligence page lists sanctions, modern slavery, adverse media and other checks, risk profiles organised by risk event, configurable rules and a record of decisions. The page mentions analysts only in a customer quotation, so analyst review is not stated as a vendor service. Confirm what a modern slavery finding looks like in a record and who performs the review.

    Exiger due diligence solutions, checked 2 October 2026
    Product-level modern slavery data and integrationsDepends on scope

    The risk and compliance page describes product-aware datasets linking products to input-level origin, facilities and owners, and an API-first approach with native ERP, source-to-pay and case system integrations. Verify which integrations are available for your systems and which data modules are in your contract.

    Exiger risk and compliance, checked 2 October 2026
    Security certificationsDocumented by vendor

    The risk and compliance page states FedRAMP Moderate authorisation, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2. Request current reports and confirm which deployment they cover.

    Exiger risk and compliance, checked 2 October 2026
    Third-party onboarding and continuous monitoringDocumented by vendor

    The page describes automated onboarding and offboarding, conditional workflows and continuous monitoring with real-time risk ratings. Check how forced labour appears as a risk category.

    Exiger third-party risk management, checked 2 October 2026
    Transshipment and trade-origin detectionDocumented by vendor

    The article describes rebuilding trade routes from shipment records and linking shipments to beneficial owners and forced labour risk. Test it with your own shipment data.

    Exiger transshipment intelligence article, checked 2 October 2026

    Exiger pricing

    Quote-based

    Separate pricing recheck date not recorded. Confirm current pricing with the vendor.

    Which product scope should the quote cover?

    Supply chain risk, third-party risk and due diligence on the 1Exiger platform; software supply chain security is a separate product.

    Ask the vendor to identify the product, region, modules, billing unit, contract term and included services in writing.

    Offline work and integrations

    Not applicable in the usual sense: Exiger is a web platform for supplier risk assessment and reporting, and no offline or mobile field mode is documented on the reviewed pages.

    What we could not verify

    2 depend on scope · 1 note

    Demo script

    Proposed demo: bill of materials to evidenced forced labour flag

    1. Provide a sample product bill of materials and supplier list covering at least three tiers.
    2. Review the map, noting which tiers and links are inferred rather than confirmed.
    3. Open a flagged entity, inspect its evidence and record a reviewer decision.
    4. Trace the finding to an action and to the statement or disclosure it would support; export the audit record.

    Proposed demo: third-party onboarding with continuous monitoring

    1. Onboard a test third party through a workflow that includes forced labour and adverse media checks.
    2. Review the resulting risk profile and note which risk events contribute to the rating.
    3. Ask the vendor to show a later risk change raising a monitoring alert.
    4. Offboard the entity and export the full decision record for audit.

    Ask the vendor to show you

    1. Which data do suppliers need to provide, and what is scored from spend and supplier names alone?
    2. How does the platform capture signals that contradict a supplier's own questionnaire answers?
    3. How is a finding linked to a remediation action and to the sentence in the published statement?
    4. Which jurisdictions' reporting criteria are mapped (UK, Australia, Canada, EU), and who maintains that mapping?

    Checks specific to this product

    Sub-tier depth on your own products:
    Supply a sample bill of materials and ask the vendor to map it. Record the tiers reached, how many entities are resolved and which links are inferred. Keep the output for comparison with supplier-confirmed data.
    Forced labour data scope and geography:
    The UFLPA page is scoped to Xinjiang and Chinese networks for US importers. Ask which datasets apply to the UK, Australian, Canadian and EU regimes and which regions are not covered.
    Use demo checklist

    Questions the sources answer

    Which data sources does Exiger describe?

    The pages describe proprietary and open-source data, watchlists, premium news and trade records. Two pages state 300 million companies and 6 billion people; these are unverified vendor figures. The language count is an animated counter, so ask for the list in writing.

    Is the forced labour solution limited to certain regions?

    The UFLPA solution page describes a scope of Xinjiang and Chinese supply chain networks for goods entering the United States. Ask about coverage for other jurisdictions before relying on it for a UK, Australian or EU statement.

    Are prices or a trial published?

    No. The pages reviewed state no pricing. Request a quote that names modules, data sets and user numbers.

    Sources

    11 sources, checked

    Compare with

    Drawn from the profiles behind the Alternatives list above: most category tags shared with Exiger first, then the closest overlap in documented capability names, then A to Z. Ratings, search demand and sponsorship are not used; rows are shown A to Z.

    • Fair Supply

      Shared category tags: 3 (Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence, others).

      Same: scope, offline, price and trial.

    • Informed 365

      Shared category tags: 3 (Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence, others).

      Same: scope, offline, price and trial.

    • IntegrityNext

      Shared category tags: 3 (Modern Slavery, Supplier Due Diligence, others).

      Same: scope, offline, price and trial.

      Side by side: Exiger and IntegrityNext
    All Exiger alternatives

    Reviews on qhsetech.com

    Star ratings and review counts from the old catalog are not shown: no source for them was recorded.