Skip to main content

    Fair Supply

    Fair Supply screens a supplier list from supplier names and spend to baseline modern slavery risk by geography and industry. Its product page describes risk tracing up to ten tiers deep, supplier triage against risk thresholds, supplier engagement workflows, remediation tracking and date-stamped, user-attributed assessments feeding modern slavery statements and board reports.

    Evidence: Researched profile

    Built from vendor sources checked ; AI-assisted drafting. Documentation review, not a hands-on test. How pages are made

    Who is Fair Supply for?

    Organisations preparing modern slavery statements that need to prioritise suppliers from spend data. Inherent risk mapping from spend and sector models estimates exposure; it does not establish conditions at a named supplier. Confirm how modelled tiers differ from supplier-confirmed data, and how worker-level signals reach the record.

    Watch for: Deep-tier results are modelled; confirm which are supplier-verified.

    Sources checked .

    Capabilities and scope

    Fair Supply is an Australian supply chain risk platform. This profile covers its modern slavery risk assessment, due diligence and reporting software, not its advisory services.

    Fair Supply capabilities, evidence status and source links
    CapabilityEvidenceScope and source
    Modern slavery risk assessmentDocumented by vendor

    The product page describes screening all suppliers to baseline modern slavery risk by geography and industry, starting from supplier names and spend, with risk traced up to ten tiers deep.

    Modern slavery risk assessment software
    Supplier due diligence and remediation trackingDocumented by vendor

    Suppliers are triaged for deeper due diligence by risk threshold, engaged through built-in workflows, and remediation is tracked with date-stamped, user-attributed records.

    Modern slavery risk assessment software
    Modelled multi-tier risk from names and spendDepends on scope

    The assessment page describes a Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) approach that maps risk up to ten tiers from supplier name and spend data, including for suppliers with limited disclosure. The page does not clarify which tier results are modelled and which are confirmed by the supplier, so ask for that distinction per record.

    Fair Supply supply chain assessment, checked 30 September 2026Fair Supply FAQs, checked 30 September 2026
    Supplier self-assessment questionnaires and scoringDocumented by vendor

    The due diligence page describes centralised SAQs, tailored variants (for example SME, labour hire and offshore suppliers) and automatic scoring of responses, plus cited issues from media, NGO and regulatory sources. Confirm which question sets exist for your supplier types and how a questionnaire answer is reconciled with a cited external issue.

    Fair Supply supplier due diligence, checked 30 September 2026
    Versioned audit trailDocumented by vendor

    The page states that each assessment, engagement, score and decision is kept with its timestamp and framework version, and that mitigation and residual exposure can be compared over repeated engagements. Verify how a past assessment is retrieved and exported after the framework changes.

    Fair Supply supplier due diligence, checked 30 September 2026
    Modern slavery statement and board reporting outputsDocumented by vendor

    The reporting page lists modern slavery statement support for the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth), along with board-ready and regulator-ready ESG reports. Jurisdictions named on the pages reviewed are Australia, New Zealand and the EU; confirm coverage for any other regime, such as the UK or Canada, before relying on it.

    Fair Supply compliance reporting, checked 30 September 2026Modern slavery risk assessment software
    Information security certificationDocumented by vendor

    The trust page states ISO 27001:2022 certification, encryption in transit and at rest, annual penetration testing, least-privilege access and GDPR compliance for EU and UK requirements. Request the certificate scope and latest test summary through vendor onboarding rather than relying on the web statement.

    Fair Supply trust and security, checked 30 September 2026

    Fair Supply pricing

    Quote-based

    Separate pricing recheck date not recorded. Confirm current pricing with the vendor.

    Which product scope should the quote cover?

    Modern slavery risk assessment, supplier due diligence, engagement and reporting outputs; emissions and biodiversity modules and advisory services are separate scopes.

    Ask the vendor to identify the product, region, modules, billing unit, contract term and included services in writing.

    Offline work and integrations

    Not applicable in the usual sense: Fair Supply is a web platform for supplier risk assessment and reporting, and no offline or mobile field mode is documented on the reviewed pages.

    What we could not verify

    1 depends on scope · 1 note

    Demo script

    Proposed demo: spend file to a cited supplier decision

    1. Upload a representative supplier and spend file and record match rates and the tiers shown.
    2. Select a high-risk supplier, send a tailored SAQ and score the response.
    3. Record a mitigation decision, then compare the assessment with a repeat engagement.
    4. Export the audit history and a statement section; check what is modelled, confirmed and manually authored.

    Ask the vendor to show you

    1. Which data do suppliers need to provide, and what is scored from spend and supplier names alone?
    2. How does the platform capture signals that contradict a supplier's own questionnaire answers?
    3. How is a finding linked to a remediation action and to the sentence in the published statement?
    4. Which jurisdictions' reporting criteria are mapped (UK, Australia, Canada, EU), and who maintains that mapping?

    Checks specific to this product

    Modelled versus supplier-confirmed tiers:
    Ask for a sample record showing how a deep-tier result is labelled when it comes from the MRIO model rather than from a supplier response. Retain an export showing both states side by side. The assessment page does not distinguish them.
    Use demo checklist

    Sources

    8 sources, checked

    Reviews on qhsetech.com

    Star ratings and review counts from the old catalog are not shown: no source for them was recorded.