Content date: 2 October 2026 · Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios · No individual check logged· AI use

Video ergonomic assessment vs noise and vibration monitoring · Guide revised September 2026

TuMeke Ergonomics vs Acoem (Cadence and Airodis): Scope, limits and demo questions

Side-by-side comparison

TuMeke Ergonomics and Acoem (Cadence and Airodis): pricing, evaluation starting point, scope, what to verify and offline scope. Select a row label to show its full text.
Attribute	TuMeke Ergonomics	Acoem (Cadence and Airodis)
	No amount on record; request quote
	Occupational Health	Environmental Management
	Validate user roles, sites and scale against your proposed deployment.
	Confirm hosting, support languages and contractual coverage for your region.
	See the linked profile's capability evidence
	See the linked profile's unresolved questions
	Not yet classified

Where the two scopes differ

These records describe different hazards measured in different ways. TuMeke turns phone or uploaded video of a task into estimated 3D joint positions and angles, names RULA, REBA and the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation among its methods, adds a Revised Strain Index, Snook or Liberty Mutual equations and ROSA for office work, and wraps the scores in improvement tracking and a multi-site dashboard. Acoem's record describes two products around its own instruments: Cadence, a cloud dashboard that connects Acoem's own noise and vibration monitors, and Airodis, which runs on Windows with SQL Server to collect, validate and report logger data. Neither record describes the other's hazard.

Both records put a person between the output and the decision. The TuMeke record treats scores and AI recommendations as decision support, says a qualified person should approve interventions, and describes vendor injury-reduction figures as marketing claims. The Acoem record treats Cadence's source labels as hypotheses to check against recordings, and says Airodis requires a reason for each data change, marks edited values and keeps a reversible log. These are described controls, not measured results: neither record shows how often a score or a label is right.

Buying terms and the technical footprint differ. TuMeke sells annual subscriptions, licensed per facility or per user, with a 14-day trial that needs no card, and Enterprise additions such as single sign-on and customised reports; the record found no numeric price and no established API or offline mode. Acoem publishes no software or instrument price and routes to request forms, so software, instruments, communications and calibration have to be itemised separately. Cadence depends on a connected monitor and a user online, and the record leaves open how monitors buffer data during an outage. Acoem's accreditation page names specific organisations, laboratories and services, which is not a certificate for the software.

TuMeke Ergonomics: status on record

Trial: Free trial documented.
Offline: Not yet classified.
Pricing: No amount on record; request quote.
Profile record checked 2 October 2026.

Acoem (Cadence and Airodis): status on record

Trial: Trial or demo on request.
Offline: Not yet classified.
Pricing: No amount on record; request quote.
Profile record checked 2 October 2026.

When each is the safer first demo

Start with TuMeke Ergonomics when

TuMeke suits a first demo when the question is a manual task or a workstation that can be filmed. Bring one lifting task and one desk setup, record both on your own phone, and ask to see which inputs were estimated from the video, which were typed in, and how a low-confidence pose is shown.

Start with Acoem (Cadence and Airodis) when

Acoem suits a first demo when the question is a measured level at a fixed point and compatible instruments are owned or planned. Bring the monitor or logger model, firmware and a recent month of data, and ask to see a gap, a reviewed exceedance and an edited value in the audit log.

A two-week evaluation plan

Ask TuMeke Ergonomics

Which of the named methods are in the package you would buy, which inputs come from the video and which must be entered or overridden by a person?
What are the terms for worker video and derived movement data (basis, notice, retention, deletion, hosting, model training), and what happens to trial data after the stated 30 days?

Ask Acoem (Cadence and Airodis)

What do Cadence, Airodis, instruments, communications, calibration and any Acoem reporting service cost as separate lines, and on what renewal terms?
Is each monitor or logger model and firmware you own on the current compatibility lists, and can you see current API and security documents rather than the 2021 datasheet?

Week 1: put each question in the form it takes. For TuMeke, use the 14-day trial to record one real task and one hard case, such as protective equipment or a hidden limb, and have a qualified person compare the scores with their own observation. For Acoem, ask for a demonstration on the monitor model you would buy and take it offline for an hour to see whether the gap is flagged, filled or lost. The record lists no free trial for Acoem, so agree a vendor-run session.

Week 2: test each follow-up step. In TuMeke, assign one intervention, repeat the assessment under comparable conditions, export the evidence before the trial ends and confirm how deletion is handled. In Acoem, have an acoustician review ten Cadence exceedance labels against the recordings and, in Airodis, invalidate one hour with a reason, reverse it and trace both entries into the scheduled report.

Worked evaluation scenarios

These scenarios are hypothetical. They show how to turn the record facts into a demo test and what outcome would change a choice; they are not case studies or customer results.

Hypothetical: a packing line is rebuilt and someone must show the change helped

A distribution centre moves a packing bench and wants evidence that the redesign reduced strain on the workers. The TuMeke pages describe baseline and repeat assessments, an Improvements feature for assigning and confirming interventions, and a caution to compare similar loads, pace and cycle stages. The Acoem record covers noise, vibration and logger data and describes no posture or manual-handling assessment. Record the same task before and after on a phone, ask a qualified person to check the scores against what they see, and ask Acoem which part of the redesign, if any, its instruments would measure. If the answer is that they would not, the comparison is about scope, not features.

Hypothetical: a site is warned about evening noise by its neighbours

A construction site receives complaints about evening noise and has a permit limit. The Acoem record describes Cadence labelling each exceedance with a main and a secondary likely source, which the record says to check against audio and the site log, and sending real-time alerts. The TuMeke record describes ergonomic assessment of video and does not describe noise or vibration measurement. Ask Acoem to connect the monitor model you would buy, create two exceedances from known sources and show the labels beside the audio. Count the labels your acoustician accepts. If the monitor must be bought with the software, or the labels need correction before a report, include that effort in the comparison.

Hypothetical: a security questionnaire arrives before any pilot starts

A group security team sends a questionnaire before approving a pilot, and the pilot would involve recordings or instrument data. The TuMeke packages page advertises SOC 2 Type II without a report in the record, and the record asks about consent, retention, deletion, hosting and model training for worker video and derived movement data. The Acoem record notes that the public Cadence security datasheet is dated October 2021 and that Airodis runs on a Windows machine with SQL Server, which the buyer would have to administer. Ask each vendor for current documents and a named owner for every answer. If a document is older than the product, or the server is yours, name who patches it.

What the records do not establish

TuMeke Ergonomics

A numeric subscription price.
Offline capture, offline scoring or queued synchronisation, and whether an API is included.
That the scores hold for your tasks, protective equipment, lighting and camera angles: no validation evidence was reviewed.

Acoem (Cadence and Airodis)

A price for software or instruments, or a free trial.
How monitors buffer measurements in an outage, and whether Cadence fills the gap.
The share of Cadence's source labels that an acoustician would accept.
Current API, retention and security terms beyond the October 2021 datasheet.

Neither product

Which product suits a given programme: they address different hazards and no outcome comparison was reviewed.
Whether any badge or accreditation covers the product you would buy, since no SOC 2 report was reviewed and Acoem's accreditations name specific services and sites.

Written from the profile records and the decision guide above, not from a hands-on test. Where a record is silent, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Evaluate TuMeke Ergonomics

Identify the exact product, application and licence.
Review the profile's demonstration questions.
Run the same task and record unresolved questions.

See TuMeke Ergonomics profile

Evaluate Acoem (Cadence and Airodis)

Identify the exact product, application and licence.
Review the profile's demonstration questions.
Run the same task and record unresolved questions.

See Acoem (Cadence and Airodis) profile

TuMeke Ergonomics vs Acoem (Cadence and Airodis) | FAQ

Which product is cheaper?

Comparable total cost has not been established. Request the same applications, users, sites, configuration, migration, integrations and support period from both vendors. Published entry pricing is subject to the plan conditions shown in each profile.

How should I compare offline capability?

Use the exact proposed mobile application and plan. Download required data, disconnect, create a record with a photo, reconnect and inspect synchronization. Record which preparation and tasks require connectivity.

How should I decide between these products?

Set acceptance criteria for your actual workflow. Complete the same demo, record observed results separately from vendor statements and resolve remaining questions in a scoped pilot. The linked profiles show the sources and review status for each product.

Vendor sources and next steps

TuMeke Ergonomics15 sources, profile checked 2 October 2026

Acoem (Cadence and Airodis)14 sources, profile checked 2 October 2026

Record the same demo tasks in the scorecard →

Related comparisons

Need a personalised shortlist?

Answer the matching questionnaire to explore up to 5 platforms based on your industry, size and processes, then verify the requirements with each vendor.

Get matched