myosh Alternatives
5 of 81 products that share a software category or a capability term with myosh, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with myosh: Benchmark Gensuite, ecoPortal, EHS Insight, Synergi Life (DNV) and Tekmon (alphabetical, not a ranking).
Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site; its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. myosh record checked 10 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the myosh profile · How candidates are matched · Already using myosh? What to check before switching
myosh's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: EHS Management, Incident Management and Inspection Management. Offline filter: Partial offline workflow. Pricing: myosh publishes AUD 228/month plus AUD 3,768 one-time licence (check product, module and purchase scope) (model: “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”). Pricing sources checked 27 September 2026: published pricing reviewed. Trial: trial or demo on request.
- Benchmark Gensuite
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Inspection Management, Audits & Inspections and 1 more
Why listed, where it differs, against myosh
Why listed: Categories shared with myosh: EHS Management, Incident Management and Inspection Management. Tags shared with myosh: Audits & Inspections and Quality Management. Capability names sharing a term: myosh's “Quality nonconformance, CAPA and sign-off” and Benchmark Gensuite's “Audit programme, findings review and CAPA”; myosh's “Inspection form configuration” and Benchmark Gensuite's “Inspection programs”. Offline filter: Benchmark Gensuite and myosh, partial offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: Benchmark Gensuite has no verified published paid amount recorded; myosh has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Benchmark Gensuite, trial status not established; myosh, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Benchmark Gensuite only: Permit to Work and ESG & Sustainability Reporting. Conditional in Benchmark Gensuite's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Offline mobile capture” and “Initial injury reports from first aid responders”.
Against myosh: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Benchmark Gensuite, “Work permit lifecycle” and “Lockout/tagout procedures” (2 of 3); myosh, “Assigned corrective actions” and “Contractor registration and induction records”. Pricing model: Benchmark Gensuite, “Quote-based enterprise subscription”; myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”. Integration capabilities: Benchmark Gensuite, “Enterprise data exchange” (conditional); myosh, “Integration and authentication” (conditional).
- ecoPortal
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Risk Management, Quality Management and 2 more
Why listed, where it differs, against myosh
Why listed: Categories shared with myosh: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with myosh: Risk Management, Quality Management, CAPA Management and Nonconformance. Capability names sharing a term: myosh's “Quality nonconformance, CAPA and sign-off” and ecoPortal's “Quality management and nonconformance”; myosh's “Incident investigation” and ecoPortal's “Incident and near-miss capture”. Offline filter: ecoPortal and myosh, partial offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: ecoPortal has no verified published paid amount recorded; myosh has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Software categories assigned to ecoPortal only: Environmental Management. Conditional in ecoPortal's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Offline mobile reporting” and “Linked contractor modules”.
Against myosh: Pricing model: ecoPortal, “Contact vendor”; myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”.
- EHS Insight
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Inspection Management, Quality Management and 2 more
Why listed, where it differs, against myosh
Why listed: Categories shared with myosh: EHS Management, Incident Management and Inspection Management. Tags shared with myosh: Quality Management, CAPA Management and Nonconformance. Capability names sharing a term: myosh's “Quality nonconformance, CAPA and sign-off” and EHS Insight's “Quality management and CAPA”; myosh's “Inspection form configuration” and EHS Insight's “Offline inspections and incidents”. Pricing: EHS Insight and myosh both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; EHS Insight has a published amount recorded as “Published from $5,000/year; confirm currency and scope” (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Offline filter: EHS Insight, documented offline workflow; myosh, partial offline workflow. Trial: EHS Insight, free trial documented; myosh, trial or demo on request. Conditional in EHS Insight's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Mobile actions and reference records” and “Modular subscription”.
Against myosh: Pricing model: EHS Insight, “Annual modular subscription”; myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”.
- Synergi Life (DNV)
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Risk Management, Quality Management and 2 more
Why listed, where it differs, against myosh
Why listed: Categories shared with myosh: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with myosh: Risk Management, Quality Management, CAPA Management and Nonconformance. Capability names sharing a term: myosh's “Quality nonconformance, CAPA and sign-off” and Synergi Life (DNV)'s “Quality management and CAPA”; myosh's “Incident investigation” and Synergi Life (DNV)'s “Incident investigation and corrective follow-up”. Offline filter: Synergi Life (DNV) and myosh, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Synergi Life (DNV) and myosh both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Synergi Life (DNV) publishes EUR 7,000 per year (Entry 5 user pack, VAT not included, annual billing) (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: Synergi Life (DNV), free trial documented; myosh, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Synergi Life (DNV) only: Permit to Work, Process Safety Management and Environmental Management. Software categories assigned to myosh only: Inspection Management. Conditional in Synergi Life (DNV)'s record: “Disconnected field reporting” and “Public anonymous reporting”.
Against myosh: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Synergi Life (DNV), “Bow-tie and barriers”; myosh, “Offline submission synchronization” and “Inspection form configuration”. Pricing model: Synergi Life (DNV), “Custom quote; published entry plans for the risk-management starter pack”; myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”.
- Tekmon
Shares: EHS Management, Inspection Management, Incident Management, Audits & Inspections and 2 more
Why listed, where it differs, against myosh
Why listed: Categories shared with myosh: EHS Management and Inspection Management. Tags shared with myosh: Incident Management, Audits & Inspections, Quality Management and CAPA Management. Capability names sharing a term: myosh's “Quality nonconformance, CAPA and sign-off” and Tekmon's “Cross-discipline quality and safety CAPA”; myosh's “Inspection form configuration” and Tekmon's “Configurable audit and inspection templates”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Tekmon, documented offline workflow; myosh, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Tekmon has no verified published paid amount recorded; myosh has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: Tekmon, free trial documented; myosh, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Tekmon only: Quality Management Systems (QMS), CMMS & Maintenance Management and Permit to Work. Conditional in Tekmon's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “CAPA assignment and approval” and “ISO 9001 / ISO 22000 process templates”.
Against myosh: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Tekmon, “Maintenance and asset workflows” and “Permit requests and approval routing” (2 of 10). Pricing model: Tekmon, “Enterprise subscription; custom quote”; myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”. Integration capabilities: Tekmon, “ERP and reporting connections” (conditional); myosh, “Integration and authentication” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Tekmon, “Document library with history and access control” (documented).
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
76 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.
Already using myosh? What its record leaves open
Limitations the myosh profile records:
- Advanced configuration and integrations require package confirmation
- Existing offline record access is limited by configuration
- Trial environment cannot be continued as production
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 10 October 2026): Quality records, document control and supplier-quality audits; Offline record creation; Inspection automation; Integration and authentication; Psychosocial risk module using Skodel assessment tools. Check each against the contract you hold.
Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):
- “Quality records, document control and supplier-quality audits”: Benchmark Gensuite's “Audit programme, findings review and CAPA”, EHS Insight's “Audit forms, offline execution and actions”, Synergi Life (DNV)'s “End-to-end audit planning and findings follow-up” and Tekmon's “Configurable audit and inspection templates”.
- “Inspection automation”: Benchmark Gensuite's “Inspection programs”, EHS Insight's “Offline inspections and incidents” and Tekmon's “Configurable audit and inspection templates”.
myosh evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Functional depth: Trace a finding through assignment, escalation, verification and export. Source
- Usability & adoption: Observe a worker reporting from the intended device and connection conditions. Source
- Implementation & TCO: Confirm module scope and the effort required to configure your real workflow. Source
- Integrations & API: Request interface documentation and ownership of integration maintenance. Source
- Security & trust: Test role visibility and request current security evidence for the proposed deployment. Source
Leaving myosh: what to plan for
- Drain the devices before cutover. The mobile app stores work locally while disconnected and uploads submitted records when it next connects, and the record says guarantees for resolving conflicting edits are not established. Set a date after which nobody creates new records, have every device reconnect and confirm nothing is pending, and only then export, so an inspection finished in a basement is not lost between systems.
- Look at how the contract is structured. Entry pricing is a monthly subscription plus a one-time licence charge, and the Rules Engine for inspection automation, API integration and single sign-on appear only in the Custom offering. The record gives no terms for ending an agreement, so ask whether the once-off charge has any residual value, and if you rely on Custom features, note that your agreement is bespoke and must be read in full.
- Protect the confidentiality and history when exporting. Incident records can have confidential visibility, nonconformances end in an authoriser decision to sign off, refer or reopen, and documents carry record-level versions and audit logs. An export run by an administrator can reveal what a role-restricted user could not see, so check that restricted incidents stay restricted in the replacement and that the decisions and logs travel with them.
Who may have reason to stay with myosh
- This product is pitched at organisations that are retiring separate registers in favour of linked safety and quality records with accountable follow-up. If incidents lead to actions and nonconformances lead to corrective and preventive actions in your use, those links are the thing a split across two vendors would break, so count how many of them you actually use before deciding that a safety-only candidate is enough.
- Published entry pricing gives a team a firm baseline. Classic and Classic Plus are priced in Australian dollars, exclude GST, cover up to ten users and include training and implementation. Compare first-year totals, including the once-off charge, with a candidate's quote rather than monthly figures, and remember that extra modules, users and features change the quote.
- The offline design is precise, which helps you judge whether it limits you. New blank forms work without a connection and the My Activities records are cached, but other existing records need modules configured for offline access. Crews who start fresh inspections in the field fit that description; staff who must reopen arbitrary old records offline hit the real limit, and a replacement should be tested on that same distinction.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for myosh
- Reproduce the offline finding exercise on the candidate: load the app and the site records, disconnect, create an inspection with a photo and a failed item, restart the app before reconnecting, then reconnect and read the submission status, the linked action and the attachment. Have a different person verify closure, and export the change history.
- Take a supplier-related nonconformance through sign-off: log it against a named specification with evidence, classify it, record the disposition and root cause, create linked corrective and preventive actions with separate owners, and have an authoriser reject weak evidence, reopen the record and sign off the corrected version. A configurable inspection that imitates the process is not a supplier-quality suite.
- Test confidentiality with three real accounts. Create a near-miss and a separate confidential incident, look at both as the reporter, a supervisor and a reviewer, link an action and let it go overdue to see escalation, then confirm the final export respects role access. Also ask whether data entered during the candidate's trial can continue into production; here, it cannot.
Conditions and sources in the myosh profile · Recorded commercial terms
myosh alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which myosh alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): EHS Insight and Synergi Life (DNV). No verified published paid amount recorded: Benchmark Gensuite, ecoPortal and Tekmon. myosh has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope.
Which myosh alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: EHS Insight and Tekmon. Partial offline workflow: Benchmark Gensuite, ecoPortal and Synergi Life (DNV). Offline filter: myosh, partial offline workflow.
Which myosh alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: EHS Insight, Synergi Life (DNV) and Tekmon. Trial or demo on request: ecoPortal. Trial status not established: Benchmark Gensuite. Trial: myosh, trial or demo on request.