Skip to main content
    qhsetech.com
    Updated 25 September 2026
    All comparisons
    Content date: · Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios · AI use
    EHS suite vs inspection-first platform · Guide revised September 2026

    Evotix vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture): Scope, limits and demo questions

    Which requirements should drive the decision?

    Editorial interpretation of the linked vendor documentation, checked . These priorities and demo tasks are recommendations; no comparative product test was performed.

    Consider Evotix when…

    • You need incidents, risk assessments, inspections, training and contractor records in one system, and can say for each whether Professional covers it or Enterprise is required.
    • Permit, change-control or process-safety work is on the requirement list, and you will have the Enterprise application quoted and demonstrated rather than assumed.

    Published scope: Professional lists eight core areas: incidents with root-cause investigation and corrective actions, risk registers and assessments, audits and inspections, training, contractor onboarding and approvals, assets, behaviour-based safety and environmental records, plus a safety climate assessment tool. Enterprise additionally lists Permit to Work, Management of Change, Lockout and Tagout, Process Safety Management, occupational health, emissions and SDS and chemical management; a listing does not establish that an application is in Professional or how deep it goes. The mobile page describes offline incident and hazard reporting with synchronisation on reconnection, voice to text, photos, GPS and QR access to equipment instructions. Pricing depends on users, sites, modules and implementation scope; implementation is a separate one-time fee that depends on the amount of customisation, and no contract term is published.

    Consider Mitti (by SafetyCulture) when…

    • You are starting with inspections, issues and corrective actions, and can test the Free plan or the 14-day Premium trial on real recurring work.
    • You can map inspectors, investigators, reviewers and occasional contributors to full, lite and guest seats before costing the rollout.

    Published scope: The Free plan allows 10 active users and unlimited inspections with 5 active templates. On 25 September 2026 the pricing page displayed Premium at $24 per seat per month billed annually or $29 monthly, excluding taxes; its pricing FAQ says billing is in USD outside Australia and New Zealand. Enterprise and per-location pricing, with everyone at a site included, are quoted. The help center describes Investigations as capturing incident details, gathering evidence, analysing root causes and assigning corrective actions, without naming a root-cause method, and its OSHA reporting article describes Form 300, 300A and 301 downloads as PDF and CSV; only full seats can create investigations, and establishments, custom investigation fields, third-party integrations and Word, CSV, Excel or JSON exports are Premium features. Offline work is mobile-only after preparation, and Investigations is on neither the supported nor the unsupported offline list. Our evidence records no permit-to-work, management-of-change or chemical workflow.

    Run these three tasks in both demos

    1. Report a hazard with a photo while disconnected in each proposed app, reconnect and assign the follow-up.

      Acceptance evidence: Record the product, plan and seat used. For Mitti, prepare the content before disconnecting and check the step against the unsupported offline list; for Evotix, use the Professional or Enterprise app you would buy. After reconnecting, inspect server receipt, attachments, GPS or annotations, and the assigned owner.

    2. Escalate a serious incident into an investigation and close it with evidence.

      Acceptance evidence: Show who can open the investigation (in Mitti, a full seat), how evidence and root causes are recorded, and that an inadequate closure can be rejected. For US recordkeeping, produce OSHA Forms 300, 300A and 301 from the case; for a UK RIDDOR report, show which steps happen outside the platform: Evotix's incident management page says it automates OSHA and RIDDOR tracking but does not describe the report output, and the Mitti help articles reviewed cover OSHA forms, not RIDDOR.

    3. Change a risk control after an inspection finding and, if permits or change control are in scope, run one request.

      Acceptance evidence: For Evotix, show whether the risk register and any Permit to Work or Management of Change application are in the quoted product. For Mitti, ask for a permit or change workflow to be demonstrated and record it as open scope if none is shown. Export the complete history in a format the quoted plan includes.

    Keep the decision open if…

    Keep the decision open if a demonstrated step belongs to Evotix Enterprise while Professional is quoted, a Mitti step needs a Premium feature or a full seat that the seat mix lacks, or an offline step has only been shown online. No implementation duration was established for either vendor, Evotix publishes no contract term (it describes its commercial options as flexible), and neither vendor's reviewed pages establish clause-by-clause ISO 45001, 14001 or 9001 mapping or CSRD output.

    Align the proposals

    Give both vendors the same sites, reporters, investigators, reviewers and export needs. For Evotix, name Professional or Enterprise and each module, and get the subscription and the one-time implementation fee as separate lines. For Mitti, name the plan and the full, lite and guest seat mix, or ask for per-location pricing where headcount changes by site, and confirm billing currency and what Enterprise adds. Ask both for support hours, response times, single sign-on and data export in writing.

    See a filled-in requirement, quote and pilot decision →

    Side-by-side comparison

    AttributeEvotixMitti (by SafetyCulture)
    PricingPricing depends on users, sites, modules and implementation scope. The official pricing page provides no subscription amount and states implementation is a separate one-time fee. Request the chosen product, integrations, support and commercial terms as written items.On 25 September 2026 the pricing page showed Free at $0 for teams of up to 10 with 5 active inspection templates. Premium was $24 per seat/month billed annually or $29 per seat/month billed monthly, excluding all applicable taxes; the amounts were the same for each team-size option (1-10, 11-100 and 101+). Enterprise is a custom price. The pricing FAQ says billing is in AUD for Australian and New Zealand customers and USD for all other international customers. The page does not say which seat type the Premium amount covers: its FAQ prices Full and Guest seats differently, and the help center also lists Lite seats. Multi-site customers can ask for location-based pricing, one fixed price per location with unlimited users. The help center documents a 14-day free Premium trial; billing starts when it ends if payment details were supplied.
    Evaluation starting pointTeams replacing disconnected safety records with frontline reporting and accountable follow-up, or evaluating a broader enterprise EHS programmeTeams starting with inspections and corrective actions
    Company sizesValidate user roles, sites and scale against your proposed deployment.Validate user roles, sites and scale against your proposed deployment.
    RegionsConfirm hosting, support languages and contractual coverage for your region.Confirm hosting, support languages and contractual coverage for your region.
    Published scopeProfessional incidents, risk, audits and training; Professional contractor, asset and environmental records; Mobile reporting with published offline synchronization; Enterprise SDS and chemical-management scope; Enterprise permit to work, management of change and lockout/tagout; Product-specific dashboards, permissions and follow-upPrepared mobile inspections and reports; Issue reporting and corrective actions; Investigations with OSHA 300, 300A and 301 log downloads; Full, lite and guest seat permissions; Voice-assisted draft issue creation; Account-free QR issue reporting; Plan-dependent exports and integrations
    What to verifyProfessional includes environmental records, but its published list does not establish the Enterprise chemical, ESG, permit, change or isolation scope. Match every requirement to the selected product and modules.A checklist workflow is only part of the product range. Check the plan, seat type and online/offline scope for each required operation.
    Offline scopeThe mobile page describes incident and hazard reporting offline with synchronization on reconnection, and safety guidance without a signal. Professional also advertises offline mobile use. Confirm the selected app, preparation needed, attachments and approval behavior; a general mobile statement does not establish offline chemical-module access.Offline operation is supported only in the mobile app and requires preparing and synchronizing the relevant content. Supported feature categories have limits; analytics, Heads Up, lone worker, Supply, notifications, Library, sensors and the template editor are listed as unsupported offline. Account-free QR reporting opens a browser and must not be assumed to share mobile offline capability. Offline AI voice processing was not established; demonstrate the exact capture, reconnect and review sequence.

    Evotix vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture) | FAQ

    Can Mitti (formerly SafetyCulture) replace an EHS suite such as Evotix?

    Only for the workflows you can demonstrate on the plan you would buy. Mitti documents inspections, issues, actions, training, assets, investigations and OSHA forms; our evidence records no permit-to-work, management-of-change or chemical workflow for it. Evotix lists those applications for Enterprise; its Professional page does not list them. List every process you need, map it to a Mitti plan and seat or an Evotix product and module, and test the gaps before deciding.

    Is SafetyCulture the same product as Mitti and iAuditor?

    Yes. SafetyCulture announced its rebrand to Mitti on 11 August 2026, and the product is now named Mitti (by SafetyCulture); iAuditor was an earlier product name. Links to SafetyCulture pages on this site refer to the same product. The rebrand does not by itself put a new feature in your plan.

    Is Evotix suitable for a small business?

    No minimum organisation size or public subscription price was established. Evotix describes Professional as designed for mid-market teams, quotes by users, sites, modules and implementation scope, and charges implementation as a separate one-time fee. Request a proposal sized for your headcount and compare its first-year total with Mitti's published plans.

    Which platform works better offline?

    This review does not rank them. Mitti supports offline use only in the mobile app after preparation, and lists analytics, notifications, lone worker, sensors and the template editor among the unsupported features. Evotix's mobile page describes offline incident and hazard reporting with automatic synchronisation and access to safety information without a signal; per-module coverage was not established. Test the same disconnected report, attachment and reconnection in both.

    Which product is cheaper?

    Comparable total cost has not been established. Request the same applications, users, sites, configuration, migration, integrations and support period from both vendors. Published entry pricing is subject to the plan conditions shown in each profile.

    How should I compare offline capability?

    Use the exact proposed mobile application and plan. Download required data, disconnect, create a record with a photo, reconnect and inspect synchronization. Record which preparation and tasks require connectivity.

    How should I decide between these products?

    Set acceptance criteria for your actual workflow. Complete the same demo, record observed results separately from vendor statements and resolve remaining questions in a scoped pilot. The linked profiles show the sources and review status for each product.

    Vendor sources and next steps

    Evotix

    Checked 19 September 2026

    Mitti (by SafetyCulture)

    Checked 25 September 2026

    Record the same demo tasks in the scorecard →

    Related comparisons

    Need a personalised shortlist?

    Answer the matching questionnaire to explore up to 5 platforms based on your industry, size and processes, then verify the requirements with each vendor.

    Get matched