Skip to main content

    Salus Alternatives

    5 of 71 products that share a software category or a capability term with Salus, matched on what their records document.

    Alternative products to investigate

    Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with Salus: CORE-EHS, Evotix, Intelex, ITRAK 365 and Safety Champion (alphabetical, not a ranking).

    Salus record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the Salus profile · How candidates are matched · Already using Salus? What to check before switching

    Salus's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial

    Software categories: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management and Incident Management. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: Salus has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”). Trial: trial or demo on request.

    • CORE-EHS

      Shares: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management, Incident Management and Permit to Work

      Why listed, where it differs, against Salus

      Why listed: Categories shared with Salus: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Salus: Permit to Work. Capability names sharing a term: Salus' “Forms, JHAs, permits, inspections and corrective actions” and CORE-EHS's “Electronic permit lifecycle”; Salus' “Incident capture and OSHA recordkeeping context” and CORE-EHS's “Incident investigations”. Pricing: CORE-EHS and Salus have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Trial: CORE-EHS, trial status not established; Salus, trial or demo on request. Conditional in CORE-EHS's record: “Isolation and risk checks” and “Cross-site EHS reporting”.

      Against Salus: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: CORE-EHS, “Structured HIRAC risk assessment” and “Audit planning and CAPA follow-up”; Salus, “Offline field capture and sync” and “Worker certificates and readiness” (2 of 5). Pricing model: CORE-EHS, “Contact vendor”; Salus, “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”.

    • Evotix

      Shares: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management, Incident Management and Permit to Work

      Why listed, where it differs, against Salus

      Why listed: Categories shared with Salus: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Salus: Permit to Work. Capability names sharing a term: Salus' “Forms, JHAs, permits, inspections and corrective actions” and Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions”; Salus' “Incident capture and OSHA recordkeeping context” and Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows”. Pricing: Evotix and Salus have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Evotix, documented offline workflow; Salus, not yet classified. Trial: Evotix, trial status not established; Salus, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Audit Management and Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Evotix's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “SDS and chemical management” and “OSHA and RIDDOR tracking”.

      Against Salus: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Risk assessments and risk registers”; Salus, “Worker certificates and readiness” and “Orientations, training, subcontractor readiness and Trust Portal” (2 of 5). Pricing model: Evotix, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; Salus, “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”.

    • Intelex

      Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management and Permit to Work

      Why listed, where it differs, against Salus

      Why listed: Categories shared with Salus: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Salus: Permit to Work. Capability names sharing a term: Salus' “Forms, JHAs, permits, inspections and corrective actions” and Intelex's “Regulatory permit tracking”; Salus' “Incident capture and OSHA recordkeeping context” and Intelex's “Incident and action workflow”.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Intelex, documented offline workflow; Salus, not yet classified. Pricing: Intelex publishes US$44/user/month for Safety Essentials; minimum 25 users, billed annually (check product, module and purchase scope); Salus has no verified published paid amount recorded. Software categories assigned to Salus only: Contractor Safety Management. Conditional in Intelex's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Native offline field capture” and “Permit to Work”.

      Against Salus: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Salus, “Worker certificates and readiness” and “Orientations, training, subcontractor readiness and Trust Portal” (2 of 5). Integration capabilities: Intelex, “Permission-aware REST integration” (conditional) and “HR-system and Workday integration” (conditional); Salus, “API access, automations and scheduled reporting” (conditional). Pricing model: Intelex, “Published Essentials price; scoped Advanced and Enterprise quotes”; Salus, “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”.

    • ITRAK 365

      Shares: EHS Management and Incident Management

      Why listed, where it differs, against Salus

      Why listed: Categories shared with Salus: EHS Management and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: Salus' “Offline field capture and sync” and ITRAK 365's “Offline native mobile capture and sync”; Salus' “Forms, JHAs, permits, inspections and corrective actions” and ITRAK 365's “Inspections and audits”. Pricing: ITRAK 365 and Salus have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: ITRAK 365, documented offline workflow; Salus, not yet classified. Trial: ITRAK 365, trial status not established; Salus, trial or demo on request. Conditional in ITRAK 365's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Contractor onboarding and enablement” and “Tenant-based Dataverse and SharePoint records”.

      Against Salus: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: ITRAK 365, “Camera, GPS and device notifications” and “Risk assessment and configurable matrices” (2 of 3); Salus, “Worker certificates and readiness” and “Rosie AI assistant” (2 of 3). Integration capabilities: ITRAK 365, “Configurable workflows and connector service” (conditional); Salus, “API access, automations and scheduled reporting” (conditional). Pricing model: ITRAK 365, “Custom quote”; Salus, “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”.

    • Safety Champion

      Shares: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management, Incident Management and Site Induction

      Why listed, where it differs, against Salus

      Why listed: Categories shared with Salus: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with Salus: Site Induction. Capability names sharing a term: Salus' “Forms, JHAs, permits, inspections and corrective actions” and Safety Champion's “Inspections and checklists”; Salus' “Incident capture and OSHA recordkeeping context” and Safety Champion's “Safety incidents and actions”. Pricing: Safety Champion and Salus have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Safety Champion, documented offline workflow; Salus, not yet classified. Trial: Safety Champion, trial status not established; Salus, trial or demo on request.

      Against Salus: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Safety Champion, “Risk assessment and mitigation planning”; Salus, “Worker certificates and readiness” and “Rosie AI assistant” (2 of 4). Integration capabilities: Safety Champion, “HR and analytics connections” (conditional); Salus, “API access, automations and scheduled reporting” (conditional). Access, security and record controls: Safety Champion, “Controlled user access” (documented); Salus, “Security attestations and data hosting” (unverified). Pricing model: Safety Champion, “Free edition and custom quote”; Salus, “Custom quote after a short form and a specialist walkthrough; no published tiers”.

    Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.

    66 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.

    Already using Salus? What its record leaves open

    Limitations the Salus profile records:

    • No price, plan tiers or trial are shown; a form and a specialist walkthrough are the route to a quote
    • Security certifications and subprocessors are not described on the reviewed pages, and the terms allow hosting in Canada or other jurisdictions
    • The Procore connection is not currently confirmed for incidents, inspections or observations

    Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Rosie accuracy and independent evaluation; API access, automations and scheduled reporting; Security attestations and data hosting. Check each against the contract you hold.

    Salus evaluation checks, for every candidate

    • AI review and governance: Ask which Rosie outputs are drafts, where reviewer approval is recorded, and whether customer data is used for model training. The vendor's own methodology page says safety outputs need qualified review. Source
    • Offline behaviour in your conditions: Complete a permit, an inspection and a certificate lookup with no signal, then sync, and check what office staff see meanwhile. The vendor says a record that has not synced should not be relied on as a delivered alert. Source
    • Integration scope: Map the Procore flows against your needs, including how incidents and inspections reach Procore, since they are not currently confirmed as synced. Source
    • Credential verification and OSHA responsibility: Confirm what the certificate check does and does not prove, and which OSHA recordkeeping steps stay with your team. Source
    • Contracting entity, region and security: Establish which entity contracts with you, the governing law and data hosting, and request security attestations. The terms name SALUS Technologies Inc. with a Vancouver notices address, while the About page names SALUS Safety Technology Inc. in Seattle. Source
    • Quote scope and price basis: Ask the quote to list modules, Rosie, integrations, onboarding and migration, and the basis for pricing, because no amount or tier is published. Source

    Conditions and sources in the Salus profile · Recorded commercial terms

    Salus alternatives — frequently asked questions

    Which Salus alternatives have published amounts?

    Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Intelex. No verified published paid amount recorded: CORE-EHS, Evotix, ITRAK 365 and Safety Champion. Salus has no verified published paid amount recorded.

    Which Salus alternatives have a documented offline workflow?

    Documented offline workflow: Evotix, Intelex, ITRAK 365 and Safety Champion. Not yet classified: CORE-EHS. Offline filter: Salus, not yet classified.

    Which Salus alternatives document a free trial?

    Trial or demo on request: Intelex. Trial status not established: CORE-EHS, Evotix, ITRAK 365 and Safety Champion. Trial: Salus, trial or demo on request.