TenForce Alternatives

5 of 75 products that share a software category or a capability term with TenForce, matched on what their records document.

Alternative products to investigate

Products whose records share the most documented attributes with TenForce: Cority, Evotix, Intelex, Optial and SMS360 (alphabetical, not a ranking).

TenForce record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the TenForce profile · How candidates are matched · Already using TenForce? What to check before switching

TenForce's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial

Software categories: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: TenForce has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”). Trial: trial status not established.

Cority
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management, Audit Management and 1 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against TenForce
Why listed: Categories shared with TenForce: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Tags shared with TenForce: Audit Management and Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: TenForce's “Incident and near-miss management” and Cority's “Incident investigation and actions”; TenForce's “Permit to work with isolation and simultaneous operations” and Cority's “Electronic permit to work”. Pricing: Cority and TenForce have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Cority, documented offline workflow; TenForce, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Cority only: Occupational Health, Industrial Hygiene and Environmental Management. Conditional in Cority's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Sustainability and ESG reporting” and “Contractor qualification and field oversight”.
Against TenForce: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Cority, “Industrial hygiene exposure assessment and sampling”. Pricing model: Cority, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; TenForce, “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”.
Evotix
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Permit to Work, Audit Management and 1 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against TenForce
Why listed: Categories shared with TenForce: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with TenForce: Permit to Work, Audit Management and Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: TenForce's “Incident and near-miss management” and Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows”; TenForce's “Permit to work with isolation and simultaneous operations” and Evotix's “Enterprise permit, change and isolation modules”. Pricing: Evotix and TenForce have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Evotix, documented offline workflow; TenForce, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: Chemical & SDS Management. Conditional in Evotix's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “SDS and chemical management” and “OSHA and RIDDOR tracking”.
Against TenForce: Pricing model: Evotix, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; TenForce, “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”.
Intelex
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management, Audit Management and 1 more
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against TenForce
Why listed: Categories shared with TenForce: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Tags shared with TenForce: Audit Management and Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: TenForce's “Incident and near-miss management” and Intelex's “Incident and action workflow”; TenForce's “Permit to work with isolation and simultaneous operations” and Intelex's “Regulatory permit tracking”.
Where it differs: Offline filter: Intelex, documented offline workflow; TenForce, not yet classified. Pricing: Intelex publishes US$44/user/month for Safety Essentials; minimum 25 users, billed annually (check product, module and purchase scope); TenForce has no verified published paid amount recorded. Trial: Intelex, trial or demo on request; TenForce, trial status not established. Conditional in Intelex's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Native offline field capture” and “Permit to Work”.
Against TenForce: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: TenForce, “Lockout/tagout procedures”. Pricing model: Intelex, “Published Essentials price; scoped Advanced and Enterprise quotes”; TenForce, “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”. Access, security and record controls: Intelex, “Permission-aware REST integration” (conditional); TenForce, “Integrations, API and single sign-on” (unverified).
Optial
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management, Audit Management and Management of Change
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against TenForce
Why listed: Categories shared with TenForce: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with TenForce: Audit Management and Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: TenForce's “Incident and near-miss management” and Optial's “Incident capture and investigation”; TenForce's “Permit to work with isolation and simultaneous operations” and Optial's “Compliance obligations, inspections and permits”. Pricing: Optial and TenForce have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Trial: Optial, trial or demo on request; TenForce, trial status not established. Conditional in Optial's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Legal registers and EHS content” and “Multi-language and locale support”.
Against TenForce: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: TenForce, “Lockout/tagout procedures”. Pricing model: Optial, “Custom quote”; TenForce, “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”. Access, security and record controls: Optial, “Hosting, SSO and data residency” (conditional); TenForce, “Integrations, API and single sign-on” (unverified).
SMS360
Shares: EHS Management, Permit to Work, Incident Management and Management of Change
Compare View profile
Why listed, where it differs, against TenForce
Why listed: Categories shared with TenForce: EHS Management, Permit to Work and Incident Management. Tags shared with TenForce: Management of Change. Capability names sharing a term: TenForce's “Incident and near-miss management” and SMS360's “Incident capture, investigation and corrective actions”; TenForce's “Permit to work with isolation and simultaneous operations” and SMS360's “Work permits”. Pricing: SMS360 and TenForce have no verified published paid amount recorded.
Where it differs: Software categories assigned to SMS360 only: Driver & Fleet Safety. Conditional in SMS360's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Compliance, training, observations and safety data sheets” and “Actions, management of change, claims and document library”.
Against TenForce: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SMS360, “Fleet360 driver, vehicle and accident records”. Pricing model: SMS360, “Quote-based subscription; unlimited users stated; tiers by employee count and storage”; TenForce, “Not published; contact the vendor and book a demo”. Access, security and record controls: SMS360, “Mobile, offline, languages and single sign-on” (documented) and “Integrations, API and security attestations” (unverified); TenForce, “Integrations, API and single sign-on” (unverified).

Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.

Cority alternatives Evotix alternatives Intelex alternatives Optial alternatives SMS360 alternatives

70 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.

Already using TenForce? What its record leaves open

Limitations the TenForce profile records:

No price, plan or trial terms are shown on the reviewed pages
Integrations, API, single sign-on and hosting details are not described on the reviewed pages
Some capabilities, such as Site Layout and Enhesa content, are optional or external

Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Compliance calendar and regulatory content; Mobile and offline use; Site Layout map view; Further modules listed (change, documents, risk, quality, contractor, environment); Vendor-stated ISO certifications; Integrations, API and single sign-on. Check each against the contract you hold.

TenForce evaluation checks, for every candidate

Module scope and licensing: Obtain a list of the modules and options in the quote. Site Layout is described as optional and Enhesa content as one of several sources, so confirm what each adds. Source
Permit, isolation and lockout/tagout flow: Run one permit through risk assessment, isolation, lockout/tagout and a simultaneous operations conflict, and check who can approve, issue and close each step. Source
Offline field use: Offline reporting is described for incidents and audits only. Test permit and lockout/tagout steps where signal is weak before relying on them. Source
Linkage between modules: Check that an incident, audit finding or change can create a CAPA and that the same action record follows through to closure and effectiveness review. Source
Ownership, security and price: Ask for the ISO certificates and their scope, hosting and data terms, integration options and a written quote. The vendor says it joined Elisa Industriq in 2021; confirm how support and the roadmap are organised. Source

Conditions and sources in the TenForce profile · Recorded commercial terms