Skip to main content

    VisiumKMS Alternatives

    5 of 68 products that share a software category or a capability term with VisiumKMS, matched on what their records document.

    Alternative products to investigate

    Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with VisiumKMS: Cority, Evotix, Intelex, Notify Technology and Sphera (alphabetical, not a ranking).

    VisiumKMS record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the VisiumKMS profile · How candidates are matched · Already using VisiumKMS? What to check before switching

    VisiumKMS's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial

    Software categories: Process Safety Management, Incident Management and Audit Management. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: VisiumKMS has no verified published paid amount recorded (model: “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”). Trial: trial status not established.

    • Cority

      Shares: Incident Management, Management of Change, Risk Assessment, Audit Management and 1 more

      Why listed, where it differs, against VisiumKMS

      Why listed: Categories shared with VisiumKMS: Incident Management. Tags shared with VisiumKMS: Management of Change, Risk Assessment, Audit Management and CAPA Management. Capability names sharing a term: VisiumKMS's “Incident investigation” and Cority's “Incident investigation and actions”; VisiumKMS's “Audit programme management” and Cority's “Audit planning and finding follow-up”. Pricing: Cority and VisiumKMS have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Cority, documented offline workflow; VisiumKMS, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Cority only: EHS Management, Occupational Health, Industrial Hygiene, Permit to Work and Environmental Management. Software categories assigned to VisiumKMS only: Process Safety Management. Conditional in Cority's record (2 of 3 capabilities): “Sustainability and ESG reporting” and “Contractor qualification and field oversight”.

      Against VisiumKMS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Cority, “Electronic permit to work” and “Environmental obligations”; VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options”. Pricing model: Cority, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; VisiumKMS, “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”.

    • Evotix

      Shares: Incident Management, Audit Management, Management of Change and Risk Assessment

      Why listed, where it differs, against VisiumKMS

      Why listed: Categories shared with VisiumKMS: Incident Management and Audit Management. Tags shared with VisiumKMS: Management of Change and Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: VisiumKMS's “Incident investigation” and Evotix's “Incident, risk and inspection workflows”; VisiumKMS's “Corrective action tracking” and Evotix's “EHS audit findings and corrective actions”. Pricing: Evotix and VisiumKMS have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Evotix, documented offline workflow; VisiumKMS, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Evotix only: EHS Management, Contractor Safety Management and Chemical & SDS Management. Software categories assigned to VisiumKMS only: Process Safety Management. Conditional in Evotix's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “SDS and chemical management” and “OSHA and RIDDOR tracking”.

      Against VisiumKMS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Evotix, “Environmental activity records”; VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options” and “Implementation, training and support services”. Pricing model: Evotix, “Scoped subscription plus implementation”; VisiumKMS, “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”.

    • Intelex

      Shares: Incident Management, Management of Change and Audit Management

      Why listed, where it differs, against VisiumKMS

      Why listed: Categories shared with VisiumKMS: Incident Management. Tags shared with VisiumKMS: Management of Change and Audit Management. Capability names sharing a term: VisiumKMS's “Incident investigation” and Intelex's “Incident and action workflow”; VisiumKMS's “Corrective action tracking” and Intelex's “Nonconformance, action plans and corrective action”.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Intelex, documented offline workflow; VisiumKMS, not yet classified. Pricing: Intelex publishes US$44/user/month for Safety Essentials; minimum 25 users, billed annually (check product, module and purchase scope); VisiumKMS has no verified published paid amount recorded. Trial: Intelex, trial or demo on request; VisiumKMS, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Intelex only: EHS Management and Permit to Work. Software categories assigned to VisiumKMS only: Process Safety Management. Conditional in Intelex's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Native offline field capture” and “Permit to Work”.

      Against VisiumKMS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: VisiumKMS, “Process safety risk assessment studies” and “Hosting and deployment options” (2 of 3). Access, security and record controls: Intelex, “Permission-aware REST integration” (conditional); VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options” (documented) and “Integration with external systems, API and SSO” (unverified). Pricing model: Intelex, “Published Essentials price; scoped Advanced and Enterprise quotes”; VisiumKMS, “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”.

    • Notify Technology

      Shares: Incident Management, Audit Management, Action Tracking, Risk Assessment and 1 more

      Why listed, where it differs, against VisiumKMS

      Why listed: Categories shared with VisiumKMS: Incident Management and Audit Management. Tags shared with VisiumKMS: Action Tracking, Risk Assessment and CAPA Management. Capability names sharing a term: VisiumKMS's “Incident investigation” and Notify Technology's “Incident, near miss and hazard reporting”; VisiumKMS's “Audit programme management” and Notify Technology's “Audits, inspections and checklists”. Pricing: Notify Technology and VisiumKMS have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Trial: Notify Technology, trial or demo on request; VisiumKMS, trial status not established. Software categories assigned to Notify Technology only: EHS Management. Software categories assigned to VisiumKMS only: Process Safety Management. Conditional in Notify Technology's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Method statements, document management and action tracking” and “Dashboards and Power BI”.

      Against VisiumKMS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Notify Technology, “Security controls”; VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options” and “Implementation, training and support services”. Access, security and record controls: Notify Technology, “SSO and data-transfer integrations” (conditional) and “Security controls” (documented); VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options” (documented) and “Integration with external systems, API and SSO” (unverified). Pricing model: Notify Technology, “Subscription by number of management licences and modules; no price list on the reviewed pages”; VisiumKMS, “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”.

    • Sphera

      Shares: Incident Management, Management of Change and Risk Assessment

      Why listed, where it differs, against VisiumKMS

      Why listed: Categories shared with VisiumKMS: Incident Management. Tags shared with VisiumKMS: Management of Change and Risk Assessment. Capability names sharing a term: VisiumKMS's “Incident investigation” and Sphera's “Incident intake”; VisiumKMS's “Corrective action tracking” and Sphera's “Corrective action follow-up”. Pricing: Sphera and VisiumKMS have no verified published paid amount recorded.

      Where it differs: Offline filter: Sphera, documented offline workflow; VisiumKMS, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to Sphera only: EHS Management, Environmental Management, Carbon Accounting and ESG & Sustainability Reporting. Software categories assigned to VisiumKMS only: Process Safety Management. Conditional in Sphera's record: “Environmental, corporate carbon and product LCA scopes”.

      Against VisiumKMS: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: VisiumKMS, “Hosting and deployment options”. Pricing model: Sphera, “Scoped vendor proposal”; VisiumKMS, “Platform licence with implementation scoped and priced separately; no amount published”.

    Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.

    63 more not listed. Browse the Process Safety Management category.

    Already using VisiumKMS? What its record leaves open

    Limitations the VisiumKMS profile records:

    • No prices are published and implementation is priced separately from the licence
    • Integrations with external systems, SSO and API access are not described on the reviewed pages, and mobile use is described only in a 2021 post

    Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Regulatory frameworks named by the vendor; Number of modules; Mobile app and offline use; Integration with external systems, API and SSO. Check each against the contract you hold.

    VisiumKMS evaluation checks, for every candidate

    • Module scope and naming: Ask for a list of every module in the quote, since the home page says eight while the reviewed pages name six and mention VSDS only in a regulation list, and check which parts of PSM elements each covers. Source
    • Closed-loop actions across modules: Create a change, an incident, a study recommendation and an audit finding, then check that each produces a tracked action with an owner, date and escalation, and that closure is visible back in the source record. Source
    • Study and investigation methods: Check which study types and investigation formats you use are supported, including any LOPA or bow-tie work, since only HAZOP, PHA, what-if, checklist and JSA are named and the incident page leaves root cause analysis to the team. Source
    • Regulatory fit: Treat the framework list as the vendor's own mapping. Ask which records and reports support the regimes that apply to your sites, including any European requirements, because COMAH and Seveso are not named on the reviewed pages. Source
    • Field use and hosting: Test the mobile app offline on your devices, since the description dates from 2021, and request the SOC2 report and scope for Azure hosting or the requirements for an on-premise installation. Source
    • Price and implementation: Obtain a written quote that separates licence, implementation, data migration, training and support, since the services page says implementation is priced separately. Source

    Conditions and sources in the VisiumKMS profile · Recorded commercial terms

    VisiumKMS alternatives — frequently asked questions

    Which VisiumKMS alternatives have published amounts?

    Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Intelex. No verified published paid amount recorded: Cority, Evotix, Notify Technology and Sphera. VisiumKMS has no verified published paid amount recorded.

    Which VisiumKMS alternatives have a documented offline workflow?

    Documented offline workflow: Cority, Evotix, Intelex and Sphera. Not yet classified: Notify Technology. Offline filter: VisiumKMS, not yet classified.

    Which VisiumKMS alternatives document a free trial?

    Trial or demo on request: Intelex and Notify Technology. Trial status not established: Cority, Evotix and Sphera. Trial: VisiumKMS, trial status not established.