Skip to main content

    Buyer guidance by The QHSE Standard · Updated 20 September 2026

    Incident Management Software for Mining

    The catalog candidates matching both incident management and mining are 1Life, Emex, Tekmon, Cority, Enablon, HSI Donesafe, myosh, Assignar and Procore Quality & Safety. This is a documentation-based shortlist, not a performance ranking; verify the exact application, plan and deployment fit with each vendor.

    Report, investigate, and close out incidents and near-misses.

    For requirements beyond this category, read the Mining QHSE buying guide.

    Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios (Founder of The QHSE Standard; product marketing at Tekmon) · Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site (disclosure) · How pages are made · LinkedIn

    What to test before shortlisting

    Use these incident management tasks for your Mining evaluation. Adapt them to your operations; these are demo requests, not observed vendor results.

    Bring a real workflow

    Report a near miss with a photo, assign an investigation and close the resulting action after a second person checks the evidence.

    Evidence to retain: Keep the original report, role permissions, status history and closure evidence together in the export.

    Add your operating context

    Use a remote site with intermittent connectivity, shared devices and a contractor changeover.

    Before proceeding: Check user separation on shared devices, sync recovery and ownership after a crew leaves the site.

    Record demonstrated, partial, unmet and untested requirements separately. Leave a candidate pending if an essential requirement remains untested.

    See filled-in requirements, quote and pilot examples →

    Mine accident reporting: fifteen-minute calls, ten-day reports and underground conditions

    Mining has some of the tightest incident clocks in any sector. A US mine operator must contact the regulator within 15 minutes of knowing about a death, a potentially fatal injury or entrapment, or another defined accident, and must file an accident, injury and illness report within ten working days. In Great Britain a separate list of dangerous occurrences applies to mines, starting with any outbreak of fire below ground, and incident records at a mine must be available for inspection by nominated persons and workmen's inspectors.

    The first report may be made underground or in a pit far from coverage, sometimes relayed by radio before anyone touches a device. An incident tool for mining has to accept a report entered later without losing the real time of the event, and to hold the regulator's call as a timed step, not an afterthought.

    Dangerous occurrences with no injury, such as a fire below ground or a fall of ground after a support failure, are as reportable as injuries in some jurisdictions. Check that the incident form treats them as their own type so they are not lost among near misses.

    The operator's own investigation has a defined content. A US mine operator investigates every accident and occupational injury and writes a report giving the date and hour of the occurrence, when the investigation began, who took part, a description of the site, an explanation of the event and its cause, the name, occupation and experience of any miner involved, a sketch where pertinent, the steps taken to prevent a recurrence and a reference to any Form 7000-1 filed. Copies stay at the mine office nearest the mine for five years. Until the investigations are complete the accident site may not be altered, except for rescue, recovery, an imminent danger or protecting equipment, unless the district manager permits it.

    In the EU the mineral-extracting directive keeps the reporting duty short and general: serious or fatal accidents and situations of serious danger go to the competent authorities as soon as possible, and the employer in charge of a workplace shared by several undertakings coordinates the safety measures for all of them.

    Rules that shape this evaluation

    • 30 CFR 50.10, US MSHA immediate notification: the operator contacts MSHA without delay and within 15 minutes of knowing of a death, an injury or entrapment with reasonable potential to cause death, or any other defined accident.
    • 30 CFR 50.20, MSHA Form 7000-1: each accident, occupational injury or illness is reported within ten working days.
    • RIDDOR 2013, Schedule 2 Part 3 (Great Britain): lists dangerous occurrences reportable in relation to a mine, such as any outbreak of fire below ground.
    • RIDDOR 2013, regulation 12(2): at a mine or quarry, incident records are available for inspection by nominated persons and workmen's inspectors, excluding identifiable health records.
    • 30 CFR 50.11(b), US MSHA operator investigation: the operator investigates each accident and occupational injury and prepares a report with the date and hour, participants, site description, cause, each involved miner's name, occupation and experience, a sketch where pertinent and preventive steps.
    • 30 CFR 50.12, preservation of evidence: the accident site is not altered until all investigations are complete, except to rescue or recover a person, remove an imminent danger or prevent destruction of mining equipment, unless an MSHA District Manager permits it.
    • 30 CFR 50.40, maintenance of records: investigation reports and submitted reports are kept at the mine office closest to the mine for five years.
    • Directive 92/104/EEC, Article 3(3) and (4) (EU): the employer in charge of a workplace shared by several undertakings coordinates safety measures, and serious or fatal accidents and situations of serious danger are reported to the competent authorities as soon as possible.

    Summarised from the linked official texts, read on 25 September 2026. This is buyer context, not legal advice: have the responsible specialists confirm which requirements apply to your sites.

    Questions to settle for this combination

    1. Can the report record the time the operator knew of the accident, separately from when it was entered, to evidence the 15-minute call?
    2. Can the ten-working-day report be tracked as a due date from the event, with the responsible officer named?
    3. Can an incident be entered on a surface terminal or offline device after a radio call without losing detail?
    4. Can workmen's inspectors be given access to incident records while health details stay restricted?
    5. Are contractor crews' incidents recorded against the mine, with their employer captured?
    6. Can dangerous occurrences with no injury be recorded as their own type and counted separately in reports?

    What the records should show

    • The investigation start date and the list of participants, recorded separately from the report author.
    • Each involved miner's occupation and experience, captured as fields rather than buried in free text.
    • A sketch or annotated photo with dimensions, attached to the investigation.
    • A hold on the accident area, with the time it was released and who authorised the release.
    • A five-year retention flag on investigation reports, tied to the mine office that holds them.

    Which documented capabilities matter most here

    Signals in the researched records of the listed products:

    • Matched through a sourced tag or a documented capability rather than the primary category: 1Life, Emex, Cority, Enablon, HSI Donesafe, myosh, Assignar and Procore Quality & Safety.
    • Offline use, as classified in the records: a documented offline workflow: Emex, Cority, Enablon and HSI Donesafe; a partial offline workflow: 1Life, myosh, Assignar and Procore Quality & Safety.
    • A published price amount is on record for 1Life, Emex and myosh; the other 5 need a quote.
    • A free trial is documented for 1Life.

    Vendor-material signals, not test results; the commercial partner is not counted; no signal means not established.

    A demo script for this combination

    Ask each vendor to run these steps with synthetic data. They are demo requests, not observed vendor results.

    1. Record a synthetic entrapment reported by radio, entering the time the operator knew of it separately from the entry time.
    2. Show the regulator call as a timed step and the ten-working-day report as a tracked due date.
    3. Complete the investigation with a contractor crew involved and record their employer.
    4. Give a workmen's inspector access to the record with health details hidden.
    5. Attach a dimensioned sketch to the synthetic investigation and export the full report with its Form 7000-1 reference.
    6. Record a scene hold on the accident area and its release by an authorised person.

    9 platforms for mining incident management

    Tekmon pays for a sponsored placement (above); its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. How lists are ordered

    1Life

    EHS Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 11 Oct 2026

    1Life advertises offline forms and documents, with preload and synchronisation to verify. A report started in the pit can be finished when the crew returns to the surface; demonstrate caching of photos and signatures. The forms attach context to pictures, annotations and signatures, which fits a dimensioned sketch or a witness signature captured at the scene. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 11 October 2026.

    Emex

    QHSE Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 1 source, checked 11 Oct 2026

    Emex documents incident investigations with custom forms, predefined workflows, task assignment and document sharing. After a notifiable accident the investigation team can share evidence in one record. The same page says incident details can be captured without signal and synchronise once the device reconnects; how conflicting offline entries and large attachments are handled are demonstration questions. Vendor source, profile checked 11 October 2026.

    Tekmon

    EHS Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 1 source, checked 28 Sep 2026

    Tekmon documents incident capture, routing and follow-up (the full description is on its profile). Vendor source, profile checked 28 September 2026.

    Cority

    EHS Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 14 Oct 2026

    Cority documents occupational health and industrial hygiene programmes alongside incident workflows. Mines track dust and noise exposure; an illness report can draw on those records, subject to restricted permissions for health data. Incident classification and corrective and preventive action tracking are described, so the preventive steps a mine investigation must list can be assigned and followed up. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 14 October 2026.

    Enablon

    QHSE Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 1 source, checked 14 Oct 2026

    Enablon documents Enablon Go capture of incidents and observations while disconnected. A supervisor underground can record the event and synchronise at the surface; confirm prepared records and permissions for the licensed deployment. Go also covers offline inspections with checklists and action-plan creation, which a mine could use for the inspection of the area before the hold is released. Vendor source, profile checked 14 October 2026.

    HSI Donesafe

    EHS Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 14 Oct 2026

    HSI Donesafe documents an offline application covering hazards and incidents that synchronises automatically on reconnection. That is the pattern for reports made underground; verify attachment limits and concurrent edits. Hazard workflows can assign actions and notify the responsible worker, so a ground-control hazard found during the investigation can be tracked apart from the incident. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 14 October 2026.

    myosh

    EHS Management

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 10 Oct 2026

    myosh documents incident records that progress through review and sign-off and link to hazards and actions. A mine's review chain from shift boss to manager can be configured; verify offline behaviour on the deployed app version. Blank forms are available offline in its mobile app, but existing records are cached only for My Activities or modules configured for offline use, so an investigator underground may not see earlier records. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 10 October 2026.

    Assignar

    Construction Safety

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 14 Oct 2026

    Assignar documents incident reports among its custom field forms, next to equipment pre-checks, in a product built around crews. At a contract mining operation, ask to see an incident linked to the machine and crew involved; investigation depth needs a demonstration. Its mobile guide describes an automatic offline mode when reception is lost and a manual Go Offline option; the cached records and conflict handling are not established. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 14 October 2026.

    Procore Quality & Safety

    Construction Safety

    What the evidence covers hereVendor's own material, not a test · 2 sources, checked 14 Oct 2026

    Procore Quality & Safety documents incident list export as CSV or PDF by tab. For mine development projects that gives a quick list for regulators; it does not establish a complete archive with attachments. Incident creation includes investigation and root-cause fields, with witness statements and actions added afterwards; map each field of the operator report above to one of them before relying on it. Vendor source, source 2, profile checked 14 October 2026.

    How this shortlist is assembled

    Products match the catalog's category and industry tags and are ordered by how closely our sources document each product for the category: primary category first, then a sourced tag or documented capability, then how complete the researched profile is and whether it documents a price, a free trial and offline use, then name. Stars appear only where we hold review data for the product and never affect the order. Position in the list is not an assessment of fit or quality.

    A catalog tag does not establish a verified deployment or suitability for your workflow. Product profiles identify available vendor sources and review dates. This page does not report customer interviews or hands-on comparative testing. A labelled sponsored placement is additional to the list. The commercial partner also appears organically when it meets the same inclusion rule, with the same ordering and styling as every entry; see how lists are ordered.

    Each card's evidence row comes from the sources recorded in the product's profile. "Documents" means the vendor's own material describes the capability; it is not a test result or an assessment of fit.

    Read the editorial methodology, compare quote scope, or use the demo scorecard to record your own evidence.

    Incident Management software for other industries

    Other software categories for Mining

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How should Mining buyers choose incident management software?
    Use a remote site with intermittent connectivity, shared devices and a contractor changeover. Check user separation on shared devices, sync recovery and ownership after a crew leaves the site. Use these tasks to assess the candidates below; catalog order does not establish the best fit for your organisation.
    What is included in the price?
    Request the same scope from each vendor: applications, users and external participants, sites, implementation, migration, integrations, training and support. Record recurring charges, minimum commitments and renewal terms. Use the linked product profiles for sourced pricing conditions and the worked quote example to compare totals.
    What determines the implementation schedule?
    Identify who prepares the data, configures workflows, approves access and tests integrations. Ask for milestones and acceptance criteria tied to those dependencies. Company size alone does not establish a delivery date; agree any pilot's access, duration and cost separately.
    How are the platforms selected and ordered?
    The list matches the catalog's category and industry tags and is ordered by how closely our sources document each product for the category, then by name; ratings, reviews and payments play no part. It is a discovery list, not a ranking or a scored comparative trial. Open each profile to inspect its sources and research coverage.
    What evidence should security and IT reviewers request?
    Have the responsible reviewers specify access controls, identity integration, hosting, retention, export and assurance requirements for the intended records. Ask for current documentation with scope and exceptions, and test your required roles. A catalog tag or certification logo does not prove the proposed configuration is suitable.