Skip to main content
    QHSEtech
    All comparisons
    Content date: · Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios · No individual check logged· AI use
    EHSQ + ESG · Guide revised September 2026

    Quentic vs Intelex: Scope, limits and demo questions

    Side-by-side comparison

    Quentic and Intelex: pricing, evaluation starting point, scope, what to verify and offline scope. Select a row label to show its full text.
    AttributeQuenticIntelex
    No amount on record; request quote
    Published amount; check product and plan
    QHSE Management
    EHS Management
    Validate user roles, sites and scale against your proposed deployment.
    Confirm hosting, support languages and contractual coverage for your region.
    See the linked profile's capability evidence
    See the linked profile's unresolved questions
    Documented offline workflow

    Which requirements should drive the decision?

    Editorial interpretation of the linked vendor documentation, checked . These priorities and demo tasks are recommendations; no comparative product test was performed.

    Consider Quentic when…

    • Suppliers, service providers and visitors must be able to report without accounts, and you will test what identifies them and how their reports are followed up.
    • Site teams need dynamic risk assessments or chemical information in the same app they use to report incidents.
    • You want to buy only the modules for the processes you are replacing now and add others later.
    Published scope

    The Quentic App page, read on 25 September 2026, lets anyone report a deviation or incident with a photo from their phone without logging in, and its FAQ says field teams can record incidents, inspections and photos offline, with automatic sync once connectivity returns. Forms are ready-made or built by drag and drop. The same app creates risk assessments on the go for different work phases, shows a hazardous-chemical register sorted by place of use and storage when the chemical module is connected, documents management safety walks and toolbox talks, and links inspections to the audit module. Quentic Connect moves data to systems such as SAP, Tableau and Power BI and brings in content from Enhesa and Yordas. No price, minimum or trial was found on the reviewed pages; the demo is a guided live session.

    Sources: listed under Vendor sources.

    Consider Intelex when…

    • You want to be live on a standard safety package quickly with a known per-user cost, and everyone who reports can have an account.
    • You expect to configure workflows across many sites and will need permit, regulatory-permit or quality applications from the same vendor.
    Published scope

    The pricing page, read on 25 September 2026, lists Safety Essentials from US$44 per user a month, at least 25 users and billed annually, for incident management with near-miss reporting, action plans and inspections; it is self-serve with immediate deployment, low flexibility and responsive-web mobile, and training, document control, meetings and observations with hazard ID are add-ons. Advanced (services-assisted, medium flexibility) and Enterprise (SME guidance, high flexibility) cover safety, health, environment, ESG and quality with iOS, Android and web apps; only the Enterprise column lists API access. The native app records data online or offline with photo and voice annotation and GPS location. Permit to Work and Regulatory Permit Management are separate applications.

    Sources: listed under Vendor sources.

    Where the records differ, dimension by dimension

    DimensionQuenticIntelex
    Who can reportAnyone, through the app without a login; that is not the same as anonymous.Licensed users of the quoted tier; a login-free route is not documented in our record.
    Offline captureIncidents, inspections and photos, synced automatically; offline use of the login-free route is not established.Native iOS and Android apps in Advanced and Enterprise; Essentials is responsive web.
    Unit of purchaseModules chosen per process, plus app access, analytics and Connect interfaces.A tier, with named add-on applications.
    Risk and chemicals in the fieldMobile risk assessments by work phase; chemical register when the chemical module is bought.Observations and hazard ID as an Essentials add-on; Permit to Work for hazardous jobs; chemical scope is not in our record.
    Getting data outQuentic Connect to SAP, Tableau, Power BI and content from Enhesa and Yordas, scoped per interface.REST API that keeps the calling user's permissions; the pricing page lists API access under Enterprise.
    Pricing basisModule proposal; no amount, minimum or term found; guided demo, no trial found.Essentials price public; Advanced and Enterprise quoted; free trial access on request.

    Run these three tasks in both demos

    1. Have a supplier's driver report a spill at the gate without an account, then have an employee report the same event from the app.

      Acceptance evidence: Quentic: use the login-free route, show which reporter details are captured, who can see them and how the two reports are joined or deduplicated. Intelex: show how a person without a licence would report in the quoted tier, or record the route as open scope. Compare the two resulting records and follow-up owners.

    2. Carry out a site inspection offline that leads to a risk assessment for the next work phase.

      Acceptance evidence: Quentic: prepare the app, disconnect, complete the inspection and create the risk assessment, then reconnect and check both records. Intelex: run the inspection in the native app of the quoted tier and show where the risk assessment is held. Responsive web access is not evidence of offline capture.

    3. Change one site's approval path, then send the closed records to Power BI.

      Acceptance evidence: Name who makes the change and whether vendor services are needed. Quentic: show the Connect transfer and a failed transfer with its owner. Intelex: show the data integration or API route in the quoted tier, including a request for a site the account may not see.

    Keep the decision open if…

    Leave either proposal unresolved when a demonstrated feature belongs to an unquoted Quentic module or a higher Intelex tier, when a login-free report is treated as anonymous or as working offline, or when native offline capture is assumed at Essentials. Neither record establishes a Quentic price, an Intelex Advanced or Enterprise price, an implementation duration or relative ease of use.

    Align the proposals

    Give both vendors the same sites, reporters, external participants, reviewers and receiving systems. Ask Quentic to itemise modules, app access, login-free reporting entitlement, analytics, each Connect interface, data import, onboarding and support. Ask Intelex to name the tier, every add-on, native mobile access, API access and services; the Essentials list price is a floor of US$1,100 a month for 25 users on an annual bill and covers only its listed applications. Compare first-year and renewal totals for the same scope.

    See a filled-in requirement, quote and pilot decision →

    Where the two scopes differ

    The guide above covers who can report and how each is priced. The records add differences in what is connected and what can be tried. Quentic's record describes a named integration offering, Connect, with content sources and data transfers to systems including SAP, Tableau and Power BI, and asks for each interface to be specified separately. Intelex's record describes a permission-aware REST API, a Workday gateway and bulk imports. In both, the existence of a named integration does not establish your interface.

    On trial, the Intelex record shows free access by request, with duration and applications to be confirmed, and Quentic offers a guided demo with no obligation, which the record does not treat as a self-service trial. On price, only Intelex publishes an entry figure. Quentic had no pricing page on 26 September 2026.

    The records also differ in the field. Quentic documents offline incidents, inspections and photos in its app and a reporting route that needs no login; its record adds that neither establishes that every connected module or the login-free route works offline. Intelex documents disconnected capture, but its entry tier lists responsive web. The Intelex record describes no login-free reporting route, so that requirement should be tested, not assumed, if suppliers or visitors must report.

    Quentic: status on record

    • Trial: No free trial established.
    • Offline: Documented offline workflow.
    • Pricing: No amount on record; request quote.
    • Profile record checked 3 October 2026.

    Intelex: status on record

    • Trial: Trial or demo on request.
    • Offline: Documented offline workflow.
    • Pricing: Published amount; check product and plan.
    • Profile record checked 3 October 2026.

    When each is the safer first demo

    Start with Quentic when

    Quentic is the safer first demo when people outside your payroll must report, because the first thing to prove is what a login-free report shows, who sees it and how it is followed up. Ask for the demo to use only the modules in the proposal. A login-free route does not make a report anonymous, according to the record.

    Start with Intelex when

    Intelex is the safer first demo when you want a defined safety package and a known per-user entry price: you can describe the pilot's size, users and applications before the demo starts. Check the tier first, because the entry tier and the quoted tiers differ in mobile access and in the applications included.

    A two-week evaluation plan

    Ask Quentic

    • Itemise the modules, app access, login-free entitlement, analytics, each Connect interface, data import, onboarding and support.
    • Ask what contractor and visitor submission requires in licences.

    Ask Intelex

    • State the tier, add-ons, native mobile access, API access and any permit, regulatory-permit or quality applications.
    • Ask for the free access to be set up on the tier you would buy, and what it enables.

    Week 1, reporting. Submit an incident from a phone with the connection off in each, with a photo, then reconnect and check receipt and the assigned action. In Quentic also submit through the login-free route as a contractor, and write down what identifies the sender. Neither vendor offers a trial the records treat as self-service, so agree the test environment first.

    Week 2, integration and access. Change a record in a source system and have each vendor show the mapping, the synchronisation failure handling and the owner. Then check what a restricted user can see: for Intelex, the record says API requests keep the user's platform permissions. Close with first-year and renewal totals for the same sites and reporters.

    What the records do not establish

    Quentic

    • A price or a pricing page, or a self-service trial.
    • That login-free reporting is anonymous or works offline.
    • Which connected modules work disconnected.

    Intelex

    • A price for Advanced or Enterprise.
    • Native offline at the entry tier, or a login-free reporting route.
    • The length of the free access and the applications it enables.

    Neither product

    • Implementation duration or relative ease of use.
    • A connector or interface to your own systems, or its cost.

    Written from the profile records and the decision guide above, not from a hands-on test. Where a record is silent, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

    Quentic vs Intelex | FAQ

    Can I compare Intelex's entry offer directly with a Quentic proposal?
    Only after aligning applications, mobile tasks, users and implementation scope. Essentials is web-only, self-serve and limited to incidents, action plans and inspections plus named add-ons, so record which Intelex tier was demonstrated and which is being quoted before setting it against a Quentic module proposal.
    Can contractors report into Quentic without an account?
    Quentic says its app accepts quick submissions without an app login and presents this as a way to involve contractors and visitors. Test what a contractor sees and submits, what identifies them, whether the route works offline and who follows up.
    Does Intelex Safety Essentials include a native mobile app?
    Not according to the pricing page read on 25 September 2026: Essentials lists responsive web, while Advanced and Enterprise list iOS, Android and web. Offline capture is described for the mobile app, so confirm native access in the tier you are quoted.
    Which product is cheaper?
    Comparable total cost has not been established. Request the same applications, users, sites, configuration, migration, integrations and support period from both vendors. Published entry pricing is subject to the plan conditions shown in each profile.
    How should I compare offline capability?
    Use the exact proposed mobile application and plan. Download required data, disconnect, create a record with a photo, reconnect and inspect synchronization. Record which preparation and tasks require connectivity.
    How should I decide between these products?
    Set acceptance criteria for your actual workflow. Complete the same demo, record observed results separately from vendor statements and resolve remaining questions in a scoped pilot. The linked profiles show the sources and review status for each product.

    Vendor sources and next steps

    Quentic12 sources, profile checked 3 October 2026, decision guide checked 25 September 2026
    Intelex20 sources, profile checked 3 October 2026, decision guide checked 25 September 2026
    Record the same demo tasks in the scorecard →

    Related comparisons

    Need a personalised shortlist?

    Answer the matching questionnaire to explore up to 5 platforms based on your industry, size and processes, then verify the requirements with each vendor.

    Get matched