Tekmon vs SafetyCulture (Mitti): Scope and Demo Plan

Mitti (by SafetyCulture, and before that iAuditor) and Tekmon both sell mobile inspection and follow-up software to operational teams. This comparison describes each product only from what the vendor's own pages establish, as recorded in our evidence files for Mitti and Tekmon, and sets out the workflow to make both vendors demonstrate. It is a documentation review, not a hands-on test. In the sections below, the products appear in alphabetical order.

Tekmon is a commercial partner of The QHSE Standard. The partnership does not change what is recorded here: both products are described from the same kind of evidence, and neither is scored, ranked or named the better choice. See our methodology and commercial disclosures.

Correction, 23 September 2026. An earlier version of this comparison did not disclose that Tekmon is a commercial partner. It scored both products on a 1–5 "verdict matrix", said Tekmon's workflows were "significantly deeper", called it "the more comprehensive solution" for ISO 45001, presented it as part of a "best software" review, and credited it with dedicated Management of Change and contractor-lifecycle modules, incident investigation with root-cause tools, training and document-control modules, a central risk register with bow-tie analysis, compliance registers, management review, clause linking, RIDDOR and OSHA record-keeping, CSRD reporting, sector frameworks, named ERP connectors and "fully functional" offline use. None of these statements was supported by the Tekmon documentation recorded in our evidence file, and they are removed. The earlier version also described SafetyCulture's template builder, integrations marketplace and named connectors, SSO and SCIM, risk scoring, incident handling and time-to-value, both vendors' contract lengths and implementation timelines, and three alternative products, without sources; those descriptions are removed too. SafetyCulture has since rebranded as Mitti. Everything below is drawn from the vendor pages listed under Sources, with the dates they were checked.

TL;DR

• What each vendor documents. Mitti's pages describe mobile inspections and reports, issue reporting, corrective actions, training, assets and analytics, sold as Free, Premium and Enterprise plans, with full, lite and guest seats on the paid plans. Tekmon's pages describe configurable audit and inspection templates, findings and corrective-action follow-up, quality approvals with document history, permit requests with approval routing, step-based work instructions and maintenance work orders.
• Pricing and trials. Mitti documents a Free plan for 10 active users and unlimited inspections using 5 active templates, and a 14-day Premium trial. Tekmon prices its enterprise subscription by written proposal and advertises a separate 14-day preconfigured trial without a credit card.
• Offline. Both document offline mobile functions. Neither vendor's pages establish that every step of a configured workflow works without a connection, and Mitti publishes a list of features that do not work offline.
• Not established for either. The reviewed sources do not document Management of Change, contractor pre-qualification, bow-tie risk analysis, compliance registers, ISO clause linking, management review or CSRD reporting for either product.
• No winner. Start with Mitti when a published inspection plan and a defined seat mix are useful starting points. Evaluate Tekmon when your buying brief centres on configuring the finding, approval and document workflow together. Both publish broader capabilities; these starting points do not establish exclusivity or a winner. Make both vendors run the same demonstration, set out below.

---

Who each product is described for

Mitti (by SafetyCulture) is a frontline operations platform. SafetyCulture announced its rebrand to Mitti on 11 August 2026; iAuditor was an earlier product name, and existing SafetyCulture profile links refer to the same product. Our profile records its fit as teams starting with inspections and corrective actions. The caution is that a checklist workflow is only part of the product range: the plan, the seat type and the online or offline scope all change what a given user can do.

Tekmon offers configurable operational applications across safety, quality, maintenance and sustainability. Our profile records its fit as teams replacing separate field checklists and follow-up records with configurable safety, quality or maintenance workflows. The caution is that a common platform does not establish which applications, configurations or services a subscription includes, so the configuration and its owner need to be agreed in the proposal.

---

Pricing, trials and contract terms

On 25 September 2026 Mitti's pricing page showed Premium at $24 per seat/month billed annually or $29 per seat/month billed monthly, excluding all applicable taxes, and Enterprise at a custom price; its FAQ says billing is in USD outside Australia and New Zealand (AUD there). It does not say which seat type the Premium price covers, so confirm the seat mix. Our evidence files record no contract term for Tekmon and no production rollout timeline for either product. Ask for both in the proposal, with named responsibility for configuration, migration and training. The current pricing records are on the Mitti and Tekmon pricing pages.

---

Documented scope

The table records what each vendor's own pages describe, as captured in our evidence files. "Not recorded" means our evidence file holds no vendor documentation for that area. It is not a finding that the capability is absent: ask for it to be demonstrated.

The reviewed sources establish none of the following for either product: Management of Change, contractor pre-qualification and lifecycle management, bow-tie analysis or a central risk register, compliance or legal registers, ISO clause linking, management review, CSRD or ESRS reporting, and RIDDOR record-keeping. For OSHA, Mitti's help center describes an OSHA section inside Investigations that downloads Forms 300, 300A and 301 as PDF, or as CSV to prepare an upload to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application, for full seats with the OSHA access permission; our Tekmon evidence records no OSHA record-keeping. Validated use of Tekmon in a regulated pharmaceutical setting is also unverified. If any of these is a requirement, write it into the demonstration brief.

---

Mobile and offline

Mitti. Offline operation is supported only in the mobile app, and the relevant content has to be prepared and synchronised first. Mitti's offline feature list names what does not work offline: analytics, Heads Up, lone worker, Supply, notifications, Library, sensors and the template editor. Account-free QR reporting opens a browser and should not be assumed to share the app's offline capability. Offline processing of AI voice drafts was not established.

Tekmon. Tekmon's inspection pages describe offline form and finding capture, and its quality page separately lists photos, signatures, attachments and approvals. Work Instructions explicitly offers offline mobile access. The published feature lists do not establish that every step works offline together, and the permit page does not establish that a permit can be authorised while disconnected.

For both, separate two cases: losing the connection during work, and starting with no signal. Test the required downloads, attachments, force-closing the app while offline and competing edits on reconnection. The demo checklist has a repeatable offline test, and the offline software comparison summarises vendor offline documentation.

---

ISO 45001 and management-system records

Neither vendor's reviewed pages establish that the product runs a complete ISO 45001, ISO 14001 or ISO 9001 management system. Mitti documents inspections, issues and actions. Tekmon documents quality approvals, task tracking and document history, and its CAPA overview describes version control. Certification is awarded to your management system, not to the software, so the question for a demonstration is whether the product holds the records your system needs.

Ask both vendors to show a controlled document going through review, approval and replacement; a nonconformity linked to its corrective action and a separate effectiveness check; a management review record with its inputs; and how an auditor would find evidence by clause. For how the three standards fit together, see our integrated management system guide.

---

Integrations and data

Mitti's plan comparison distinguishes report formats, bulk exports and third-party integration access by plan. Confirm which plan, seat and permission the export or integration you need depends on.

Tekmon's maintenance materials name business systems and describe an API. Public integration references and an API do not establish the terms or configuration of your interface, so request the connector, data flows, support and price in writing.

For both, demonstrate a real data exchange, including a rejected message. Agree who owns each record, which way data moves, how the two systems are reconciled and who is responsible when the other system changes.

---

What to make both vendors demonstrate

Send the same brief to both vendors before the meetings. Use the same fictional inspection (INS-TM01) and the same sample defect photo, and record the plan, seat type or user role, mobile app version and configuration behind each step. Leave any step the vendor could not show as unresolved rather than scoring it.

1. Build the inspection. Add required fields and a conditional approval. Establish which settings your administrator can maintain after launch and how changes are reviewed before use.
2. Capture offline. Prepare the device, start the inspection with no connection, add a photo, force-close and reopen the app, then reconnect after another user has changed the record. Inspect the synchronised record, attachment and history.
3. Close a finding properly. Assign the corrective action, reject an inadequate closure, review the correction and record final approval. Show how effectiveness is checked separately from task completion, then export the record and evidence.
4. Take a report from outside. Use the external route each vendor documents: Mitti's account-free QR issue report and Tekmon's contractor permit request. Show the identity fields, who sees the reporter's data and who can follow up or close the record.
5. Run a permit, if permits are in scope. Submit a contractor request, route it by job type and location, then show authorisation, expiry and suspension, including loss of connectivity. Export the history and list every licence required. For Mitti, ask how the quoted plan would handle this, since our evidence file records no permit workflow.
6. Test voice and language, if crews report in another language. For Mitti, record a short issue in a supported crew language and have a competent speaker check every suggested field. Ask Tekmon what its quoted configuration offers for the same case.
7. Exchange data. Show the exact ERP or reporting connection, its direction, what happens to a rejected message, the entitlement and the support owner.
8. Price what you saw. Map each demonstrated step to the plan, seat or application that enables it, and get the first-year cost in writing: subscription, configuration, migration, training, interfaces and support.

Record the results in the demo scorecard. The side-by-side comparison page uses the same exercise.

---

Where each may fit, and where it may not

Mitti may be worth a paid plan if prepared mobile inspections and follow-up justify the required seat types and features beyond the Free plan. It is less suitable if the purchase depends on disconnected analytics, notifications or template editing.

Tekmon may be worth its quoted price if configurable inspections and action follow-up cover a recurring frontline workflow and the proposal identifies configuration and integration responsibilities. It is less suitable if a basic checklist meets the need, or if the decision depends on every approval and attachment working offline without a scoped demonstration.

These are the value notes from each product's profile, not a ranking. The demonstration decides.

---

Other products to evaluate

The QHSE Standard does not rank alternatives. The alternatives to Mitti and alternatives to Tekmon pages list other products in the same category. Products with a researched evidence file include Evotix, Intelex and Quentic, listed alphabetically. Ask any vendor you add to run the same demonstration.

---

FAQ

Is SafetyCulture the same product as Mitti? Yes. SafetyCulture announced its rebrand to Mitti on 11 August 2026, and the vendor now uses the name Mitti (by SafetyCulture). iAuditor was an earlier product name. The rebrand alone does not establish that a new feature is included in your plan.

Can either product run a formal permit-to-work process? Our evidence file records no permit workflow for Mitti; ask how the quoted plan would handle one. Tekmon's permit page documents requests from employees and contractors, routing by job type and location, attached risk assessments and signatures, a permit dashboard and an audit trail. Suspension, expiry, reauthorisation and offline authorisation are not established and need a separate demonstration. For high-risk work, demonstrate the full permit lifecycle under your own conditions in any product before relying on it.

Is either product suited to a small team? Mitti documents a Free plan for 10 active users and unlimited inspections using 5 active templates. Tekmon documents a 14-day preconfigured trial without a credit card; its subscription is priced by proposal. Compare the first-year cost of the workflow you need, including configuration and seats, rather than the entry offer.

How do both products handle offline work on mobile? Both document offline mobile functions, and neither establishes that a whole configured workflow works disconnected. Mitti's offline mode is app-only, needs content prepared in advance and excludes analytics, notifications, the template editor and other listed features. Tekmon documents offline form and finding capture and offline work instructions, but not every approval and attachment step together, nor offline permit authorisation. Run the same offline test on both.

Does either product manage an ISO 45001 system? This review does not establish that either does. Mitti documents inspections, issues and actions; Tekmon documents quality approvals, task tracking and document history. Demonstrate document control, a management review record and clause-linked evidence in both before deciding.

Does Tekmon's commercial partnership affect this comparison? Tekmon is a commercial partner of The QHSE Standard. This comparison uses the same evidence files as both product profiles, describes each product only from its vendor's documentation, and assigns no score or winner. See our methodology.

---

Sources

Every product statement above comes from the vendor pages below, as recorded in our evidence files. Mitti's pages were checked on 17 September 2026, and its plan, seat, trial, offline, voice and QR help articles were rechecked on 19 September 2026; the pricing, product identity and rebrand pages returned retrieval errors at that recheck, and the pricing page and rebrand release were rechecked, and the investigation and OSHA log articles added, on 25 September 2026. Tekmon's pages were checked on 19 September 2026, with the permit and CAPA pages added on 20 September 2026. None of this is a hands-on test.

Mitti (by SafetyCulture)

• Rebrand announcement, 11 August 2026
• Current product identity and scope
• Plans, Premium seat prices and billing currency, checked 25 September 2026
• Free versus Premium plan limits
• Supported and unsupported offline features
• Full, lite and guest seat limits
• AI voice input and language limitations
• Account-free QR reporting
• Premium trial and billing
• Create and complete investigations
• Download OSHA 300, 300A and 301 logs as PDF
• Download OSHA logs as CSV for an Injury Tracking Application upload

Tekmon

• Enterprise pricing model and product positioning
• Audit templates, findings and mobile capture
• Quality workflows and document records
• Work instructions and offline access
• Maintenance scope and API references
• Free trial conditions
• Enterprise Pilot Program
• Safety application scope
• Permit requests, routing and supporting evidence
• Vendor CAPA workflow overview

Compare other pairs in the comparisons hub, or read how we research and compare software.

Updated 25 September 2026: the Mitti pricing text now gives the Premium prices the pricing page showed that day, replacing the note that the page could not be rechecked. The findings row and the list of areas not established now include Mitti investigations and OSHA log downloads, which our evidence file added that day.