OSHA NEPNational Emphasis Program
Also known as: National Emphasis Program
OSHA National Emphasis Program: a temporary programme, set out in a directive, that aims OSHA's effort at a named hazard or high-hazard industry.
Editorial definition: The QHSE Standard, updated 3 October 2026 · https://qhsetech.com/glossary/osha-nep
Scope: Check the current directive, scope and duration rather than assuming every example remains active.
Sources checked: . Examples are editorial illustrations.
What OSHA's directives and emphasis programme list say
NEP is the abbreviation for National Emphasis Program. OSHA's list describes these as temporary programmes that point the agency's effort at particular hazards and at high-hazard industries. Each is issued as a directive, and OSHA's directives page says directives set out OSHA's policy and procedure on one subject, with guidance on carrying it out and the duties of the agency's own offices. The same page states that they are not standards, regulations or any other kind of substantive rule, and that they do not require the regulated community to do more than the Occupational Safety and Health Act itself requires. The page also keeps regional directives apart and names three manuals: the Technical Manual, the Field Operations Manual and the Field Safety and Health Management System Manual.
On 4 October 2026 the list shows twelve entries, each with an OSHA instruction number and a date: combustible dust, falls, amputations in manufacturing industries, heat, hexavalent chromium, lead, primary metal industries, process safety management, shipbreaking, crystalline silica, trenching and excavation, and warehousing. The dates run from 14 August 2008 for lead to 31 July 2026 for warehousing, and the heat entry, CPL 03-00-024, is dated 10 April 2026. The falls entry is CPL 03-00-025 dated 1 May 2023, and crystalline silica is CPL 03-00-023 dated 4 February 2020. The oldest after lead is hexavalent chromium, dated 23 February 2010, and the newest after warehousing and heat is the amputations entry, dated 26 June 2025. A directive's own page shows its own date and status, so a record should store the date and status read from the directive itself.
One entry carries a note. For primary metal industries, OSHA's footnote says the programme sets no inspection goals and does not require regional offices to develop emphasis programmes, but lays down uniform steps for any unprogrammed inspection in those industries. That shows the entries differ in how they work, so one entry cannot stand in for another. Because the directives page says they add no requirement beyond the Act, the underlying standards and duties apply as they otherwise would. This page is general information, not legal advice, and OSHA's own pages govern the current list.
What an emphasis programme record set looks like in software
- A register of the listed programmes with the instruction number, title, the date shown on the list and the date the directive itself was read.
- For each programme, a decision on whether the site's activities fall within its scope, with who decided and why.
- Links from each relevant programme to the underlying standards and the site's own procedures.
- Self-inspection or audit results for the hazards named, such as dust, machinery, trenching or heat, with findings and actions.
- Inspection history with the date, the agency visiting, the documents requested and the outcome.
- A document pack for each programme, with the records an inspector might ask to see and their locations.
- A change log that notes when a directive was reissued, replaced or archived and what the site did in response.
An emphasis programme, a standard and an inspection
A standard sets requirements for a hazard, an emphasis programme is a directive about where agency effort goes, and an inspection is a visit by OSHA, which these pages do not tie to any single cause. Directives are written for OSHA's own offices, so the standards remain the place to read the duties. A programme existing for a hazard does not mean the hazard has its own standard: heat has a proposed rule and an emphasis programme but no final rule shown on OSHA's page. OSHA's list calls the programmes temporary, so an entry is not a permanent finding.
A hypothetical example: checking a list against six sites
This case is invented to illustrate the record and describes no real company. A company reads the 12 listed programmes and finds that 4 relate to its activities: heat, falls, crystalline silica and warehousing. That is 4 of 12, one third of the list. For each, the safety manager opens the directive, notes its date and status and assigns an owner.
The company has 6 sites, and each is checked against the 4 relevant programmes, so 24 site checks are recorded. Two sites have open actions from those checks, and each action is linked to the standard it supports. The register shows the number and the date on OSHA's list next to the date the directive itself was read, so a later change is visible. It notes that the heat entry is dated 10 April 2026 and that the proposed heat rule is a separate process, so both are tracked, that the check is repeated when OSHA changes the list, and that the programmes the company judged not relevant are listed with the reason.
Common misunderstandings about OSHA emphasis programmes
- A programme is not a new standard. OSHA's directives page says directives are not standards or regulations.
- The list is not a deadline calendar. It gives instruction numbers and dates, and the directive and the underlying standard set what applies to a site.
- Being outside the list is not being outside the rules. The standards and the General Duty Clause apply whether or not a hazard has a programme.
- A programme is not permanent. OSHA's list describes the programmes as temporary.
- All entries do not work alike. The primary metal industries note shows one that sets no inspection goals.
How emphasis programmes relate to other glossary terms
Three of the listed hazards have glossary pages here, and process safety has one too.
- Heat illness prevention: the hazard behind the heat entry, with the status of the proposed rule.
- Silica standard: the standards behind the crystalline silica entry.
- Walking-working surfaces: the general industry rules behind part of the falls entry.
- PSM: the process safety standard that also has an entry on the list.
Records and evidence that usually exist for emphasis programmes
- The site's copy or link for each relevant directive with the date read.
- Scope decisions for each listed programme.
- Self-inspection results for the named hazards.
- Records of the standards the programme relates to.
- Inspection history and documents supplied to inspectors.
- Corrective actions and their closure.
What a software tool needs to capture for emphasis programmes
- A register of programmes with instruction number, title and dates.
- A scope decision per site and programme, with the reason.
- Links from each programme to standards, procedures and audit forms.
- Audit results by hazard and site that can be exported quickly.
- A store for inspection documents with access control.
- Change tracking for the register, so earlier versions remain.
Catalog profiles documenting compliance management and inspection readiness
The list comes from the compliance management rule. It does not show that a product tracks OSHA directives or emphasis programmes, which should be tested with the current list.
Same rule for every product: tagged “Compliance Management”, “Compliance”, “Compliance Tracking”, “Risk & Compliance”, “EHS Management”, “ISO Management” or “Environmental Management”, with a sourced compliance obligation or regulatory content capability in its record, or one the vendor stated to us, labelled as vendor-stated. Documented and conditional capabilities qualify; check the linked scope before treating a module as included.
Ordered by how closely our sources document this process, not by quality. Sponsored placements are labelled. How lists are ordered
Cority · Environmental obligations · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Mapistry · Compliance calendar and task tracking · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Nimonik · Legal registers and obligation assignment · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Origami Risk · Environmental compliance and occupational-health scope · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
SAP Environment, Health, and Safety · Environmental obligations · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
VelocityEHS · Environmental compliance and obligation tracking · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Dakota Software · Site-specific regulatory registers and compliance calendars · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
HSI · Control of work · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
SoftExpert · Legal and regulatory requirements · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
BizzMine · Legal requirements register with Enhesa integration · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Lisam · Compliance calendar and deadline escalation · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Locus Technologies (Platform / EIM) · Permit obligations and compliance calendars · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
All 12 matching profiles are shown. Documentation review, not hands-on testing or a claim of compliance.
Related software
Frequently asked questions
Is an emphasis programme a new standard?
No. OSHA's directives page says directives are statements of policy and procedure, not standards or regulations.
How many emphasis programmes does OSHA list?
On 4 October 2026 OSHA's list shows twelve entries, from combustible dust to warehousing. Read the directive itself for its date and status.
Does every programme work in the same way?
No. OSHA's note on the primary metal industries entry says it sets no inspection goals, so entries can differ.
More safety terms
Related guides
- OSHA Top 10 Citations 2026: A Prevention Playbook
Article on the most cited OSHA standards.
- QHSE Compliance Calendar 2026 — Key Deadlines & Milestones
Calendar of QHSE compliance dates in 2026.
- Compliance Fine Scenario Calculator | Your Own Assumptions
Calculator for a compliance cost scenario.