SaferMe Alternatives
5 of 67 products that share a software category or a capability term with SaferMe, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with SaferMe: ecoPortal, myosh, SafetyAmp, SoftExpert and Synergi Life (DNV) (alphabetical, not a ranking).
SaferMe record checked 2 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the SaferMe profile · How candidates are matched · Already using SaferMe? What to check before switching
SaferMe's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: EHS Management and Incident Management. Offline filter: Partial offline workflow. Pricing: SaferMe has a published amount recorded as “Free for 2 users and 2 forms; Professional $8/user + $4/form per month” (check product, module and purchase scope) (model: “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”). Pricing sources checked 2 October 2026: published pricing reviewed. Trial: free trial documented.
- ecoPortal
Shares: EHS Management, Incident Management and Site Induction
Why listed, where it differs, against SaferMe
Why listed: Categories shared with SaferMe: EHS Management and Incident Management. Tags shared with SaferMe: Site Induction. Offline filter: ecoPortal and SaferMe, partial offline workflow.
Where it differs: Pricing: ecoPortal has no verified published paid amount recorded; SaferMe has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope. Trial: ecoPortal, trial or demo on request; SaferMe, free trial documented. Software categories assigned to ecoPortal only: Contractor Safety Management and Environmental Management. Conditional in ecoPortal's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Offline mobile reporting” and “Linked contractor modules”.
Against SaferMe: Pricing model: ecoPortal, “Contact vendor”; SaferMe, “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”.
- myosh
Shares: EHS Management and Incident Management
Why listed, where it differs, against SaferMe
Why listed: Categories shared with SaferMe: EHS Management and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: SaferMe's “Report-linked corrective tasks” and myosh's “Assigned corrective actions”. Offline filter: myosh and SaferMe, partial offline workflow. Pricing: myosh and SaferMe both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; myosh publishes AUD 228/month plus AUD 3,768 one-time licence (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: myosh, trial or demo on request; SaferMe, free trial documented. Software categories assigned to myosh only: Inspection Management. Conditional in myosh's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Quality records, document control and supplier-quality audits” and “Offline record creation”.
Against SaferMe: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SaferMe, “QR-code reporting without an account”. Pricing model: myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”; SaferMe, “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”.
- SafetyAmp
Shares: EHS Management and Incident Management
Why listed, where it differs, against SaferMe
Why listed: Categories shared with SaferMe: EHS Management and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: SaferMe's “Report-linked corrective tasks” and SafetyAmp's “Corrective follow-up”. Offline filter: SafetyAmp and SaferMe, partial offline workflow. Pricing: SafetyAmp and SaferMe both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; SafetyAmp publishes US$4,800/year for Champion (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: SafetyAmp, trial status not established; SaferMe, free trial documented. Software categories assigned to SafetyAmp only: Inspection Management. Conditional in SafetyAmp's record (2 of 6 capabilities): “Offline safety data sheets” and “Contractor qualification and check-in”.
Against SaferMe: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SafetyAmp, “Custom inspections and scoring” and “Controlled safety documents and acknowledgements”; SaferMe, “Configurable report forms and states” and “QR-code reporting without an account” (2 of 3). Pricing model: SafetyAmp, “Annual subscription with selected applications”; SaferMe, “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”.
- SoftExpert
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against SaferMe
Why listed: Categories shared with SaferMe: EHS Management. Capability names sharing a term: SaferMe's “Training records and competency” and SoftExpert's “Training and competency matrix”; SaferMe's “Report-linked corrective tasks” and SoftExpert's “Nonconformities, root cause and corrective actions”. Pricing: SoftExpert and SaferMe both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; SoftExpert publishes $30.00 per month at one user for the Risks Start plan, shown on the English pricing page only after that need is chosen (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Offline filter: SoftExpert, not yet classified; SaferMe, partial offline workflow. Trial: SoftExpert, trial status not established; SaferMe, free trial documented. Software categories assigned to SoftExpert only: Quality Management Systems (QMS). Conditional in SoftExpert's record: “Mobile and offline use” and “ESG-style indicators and exports”.
Against SaferMe: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SoftExpert, “Audits and checklists” and “Legal and regulatory requirements” (2 of 3); SaferMe, “Site sign-in and inductions”. Pricing model: SoftExpert, “Self-service monthly per-user plans (Start, Standard, Premium) for a chosen need; Enterprise on request”; SaferMe, “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”.
- Synergi Life (DNV)
Shares: EHS Management and Incident Management
Why listed, where it differs, against SaferMe
Why listed: Categories shared with SaferMe: EHS Management and Incident Management. Capability names sharing a term: SaferMe's “Report-linked corrective tasks” and Synergi Life (DNV)'s “Incident investigation and corrective follow-up”. Offline filter: Synergi Life (DNV) and SaferMe, partial offline workflow. Pricing: Synergi Life (DNV) and SaferMe both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Synergi Life (DNV) publishes EUR 7,000 per year (Entry 5 user pack, VAT not included, annual billing) (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Software categories assigned to Synergi Life (DNV) only: Permit to Work, Process Safety Management and Environmental Management. Conditional in Synergi Life (DNV)'s record: “Disconnected field reporting” and “Public anonymous reporting”.
Against SaferMe: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Synergi Life (DNV), “Bow-tie and barriers” and “Contractor and third-party operational controls” (2 of 3); SaferMe, “Site sign-in and inductions”. Pricing model: Synergi Life (DNV), “Custom quote; published entry plans for the risk-management starter pack”; SaferMe, “Free plan; Professional per user and per form; Enterprise quote”.
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
62 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.
Already using SaferMe? What its record leaves open
Limitations the SaferMe profile records:
- Current SaferMe Live and web app have no offline reporting
- Android offline app omits Sites and the Risk Register
- Each user needs a unique email address
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 2 October 2026): Risk register hazards in reports; Offline reporting by app version; API V4. Check each against the contract you hold.
Listed candidates that document a capability with a related name (confirm the scope in a demo):
- “Risk register hazards in reports”: ecoPortal's “Hazard, risk and control lifecycle” and SoftExpert's “Hazard and environmental impact assessment”.
SaferMe evaluation checks, for every candidate
- App generation for your sites: Decide per site whether crews need the offline app, and list the features they give up on Android. Source
- Per-form cost: Count the forms you will keep live, since Professional charges per form as well as per user. Source
- User identity: Plan how workers without email will log in and how aliases affect user counts and offboarding. Source
- Sensitive report visibility: Configure restricted states for incident forms and check who is alerted at each state. Source
- Billing terms: Confirm the currency, monthly versus yearly renewal and QR add-on terms before comparing with other vendors. Source
Leaving SaferMe: what to plan for
- Inventory every worker identity before exit. The product requires a unique email address for each user, and the workaround for workers without one creates aliases that each count as a user. Those aliases may stand for shared people, so they may not map cleanly to named accounts in a replacement. Decide who is a real person, who is a shared login and who can be retired.
- Count the printed and posted QR codes. The record shows codes used on vehicles and plant for pre-start checks, and says QR codes are enabled through plan settings and supplied by support. Each code points at a form in this service, so after cancellation it may lead nowhere; ask what it resolves to. Make a list of locations and form types, and plan a reprint and a notice for contractors who scan them daily.
- Plan the evidence export by plan level. The record shows task details inside report PDF downloads and a PDF export of the risk register, while a programming interface is listed only on the Enterprise plan. A team on a lower plan may therefore be exporting one report at a time, so test a bulk extract early and check whether state history travels with each report.
Who may have reason to stay with SaferMe
- Do the arithmetic on your own counts before leaving over price. The published Professional rate is $8 per user plus $4 per form each month, so a team with many users and few forms pays mostly per head, and one with few users and many forms pays mostly per form. The record also names no currency, so confirm that before comparing with another vendor's figures.
- Contractors and visitors who sign in by phone without an account are a documented strength worth protecting. Workers scan a site code and receive a link by phone number, and site managers can sign people in and out for them. A replacement that needs invitations or accounts changes the entry experience at the gate, so test that route with real contractors before treating it as equivalent.
- An offline complaint may be about the app generation, not the product. The record says the older apps work without internet while the current ones need a connection, though the Android offline app lacks Sites and the Risk Register. Test the older app on your crews' forms before leaving, and weigh what they would give up, since a move to another tool has to prove its own offline behaviour.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for SaferMe
- Build the same sensitive incident form on the candidate. Make reports visible only to administrators and the assignee, auto-assign them to the reporter's supervisor with a 48-hour due time, and watch the escalation when the time passes. Check who is alerted at each state, because the setting that hides a report from colleagues can also hide it from the person who needs to act.
- Test offline on both phone platforms and with the features your crews use. Complete an inspection with photos in airplane mode, reconnect, and compare what synced with the same report made online, including any risk-register fields. The record shows that feature coverage can differ between app generations and between Android and iOS, so a candidate may differ in the same way.
- Check that a job-specific change to a hazard stays local. Import a hazard from the register into a field report, alter its likelihood, consequence or controls for that job, and verify the master register is unchanged. Then set a near-term review date and see whether an overdue review is flagged on the manager view.
Conditions and sources in the SaferMe profile · Recorded commercial terms
SaferMe alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which SaferMe alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): myosh, SafetyAmp, SoftExpert and Synergi Life (DNV). No verified published paid amount recorded: ecoPortal. SaferMe has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope.
Which SaferMe alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Partial offline workflow: ecoPortal, myosh, SafetyAmp and Synergi Life (DNV). Not yet classified: SoftExpert. Offline filter: SaferMe, partial offline workflow.
Which SaferMe alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: Synergi Life (DNV). Trial or demo on request: ecoPortal and myosh. Trial status not established: SafetyAmp and SoftExpert. Trial: SaferMe, free trial documented.