Content date: 10 October 2026 · Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios · No individual check logged· AI use

Mobile inspections and corrective actions · Guide revised September 2026

Lumiform vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture): Scope, limits and demo questions

Side-by-side comparison

Lumiform and Mitti (by SafetyCulture): pricing, evaluation starting point, scope, what to verify and offline scope. Select a row label to show its full text.
Attribute	Lumiform	Mitti (by SafetyCulture)
	No amount on record; request quote	Published amount; check product and plan
	Audits & Inspections	Safety Management
	Validate user roles, sites and scale against your proposed deployment.
	Confirm hosting, support languages and contractual coverage for your region.
	See the linked profile's capability evidence
	See the linked profile's unresolved questions
	Documented offline workflow	Partial offline workflow

Where the two scopes differ

Both records describe a mobile inspection product that turns a failed answer into an assigned action, and they draw the edge of the product in different places. The Lumiform record bounds scope by package: Professional and Enterprise, with approvals, API access, webhooks, single sign-on and advanced integrations either included in Enterprise or bought as Professional add-ons. It also notes that the vendor says it does not plan to offer an on-premises version. The Mitti record bounds scope by plan and then by seat: Free, Premium and Enterprise, with full, lite and guest seats, and investigations, the API and integrations reserved for a full seat. So the first question to put to Lumiform is which package, and the first question to put to Mitti is which seat each named person needs.

Beyond the checklist, the two records document different things. For Mitti they list investigations that download OSHA Forms 300, 300A and 301, assigned training with practical assessment, voice-assisted issue drafts and an account-free QR route that opens in a browser. None of those four is described in the Lumiform record, which lists voice-to-text only as an item whose offline behaviour is open. For Lumiform they list configurable forms with conditional logic and repeatable sections, recurring schedules, actions that carry an owner, priority, deadline and evidence with a change log, third-party assignment, and analytics over submitted forms, negative answers and overdue items. This is a statement about what each record reviewed, not about what either vendor sells. Both records also caution that a completed checklist is not a controlled record on its own: the Lumiform record says submitted reports can be edited and that template changes reach only future forms, and the Mitti record says its inspection process does not establish a governed audit programme.

Cost and access to a trial differ in kind. Lumiform publishes no numeric subscription, asks for a quote on both packages, and its terms say only that a free trial may be offered, with no published length. Mitti publishes a per-seat Premium amount, a Free plan for up to ten users with five active templates, and a 14-day Premium trial. A published number next to a quote request is not a price comparison, because the Mitti record itself says the page does not state which seat type the Premium amount covers.

Lumiform: status on record

Trial: No free trial established.
Offline: Documented offline workflow.
Pricing: No amount on record; request quote.
Profile record checked 10 October 2026.

Mitti (by SafetyCulture): status on record

Trial: Free trial documented.
Offline: Partial offline workflow.
Pricing: Published amount; check product and plan.
Profile record checked 3 October 2026.

When each is the safer first demo

Start with Lumiform when

Lumiform is the safer first demo when the problem is the recurring inspection cycle across several sites: a schedule assigns a form to a user or group, a failed answer can prompt a photo request and create an action, and a manager looks for exceptions and overdue items afterwards. Ask for the demonstration on the quoted package, with approvals shown or ruled out, and ask to see the outbox with a result that is waiting to upload. If your crews work in several languages, test the translated checklist content itself, because the record separates the app languages from the form content.

Start with Mitti (by SafetyCulture) when

Mitti is the safer first demo when you cannot yet say how many people will inspect, review or only contribute, or when OSHA log preparation, assigned training or a reporting route for people without accounts is on the requirement list. The Free plan and the trial let you test on real recurring work before a sales call. Run the test with the seat mix you expect, since the permissions that matter differ by seat type, and keep the account-free QR route separate from guest seats when you judge the outside reporter.

A two-week evaluation plan

Ask Lumiform

Ask for one quote for the whole workspace, with approvals, API, webhooks, single sign-on and each integration on its own line, plus currency, seat minimum, billing term and add-on pricing.
Ask which roles can edit a submitted report, whether a report can be locked, and how a template version is kept for inspections completed before a change.

Ask Mitti (by SafetyCulture)

Ask in writing which seat type the Premium price on the pricing page applies to, what a lite seat costs, whether AI credits are topped up separately and what billing does when the trial ends.
Ask which exports and which third-party integrations your plan includes, and which of them need a full seat rather than a lite or guest one.

Week 1, the same inspection on both. Build or import one real checklist with a photo requirement and a rule that raises an action on a failed answer. Prepare a phone, disconnect it, complete the inspection with a defect photo, then reconnect and check that the office sees the result and the photo. On Lumiform look at the outbox before reconnecting and then check whether the new action appears without a manual swipe-down sync. On Mitti, compare what you prepared against the list of features the record says are unavailable offline. Lumiform publishes no trial terms, so ask early for a vendor-run environment.

Week 2, the people and the paper around the checklist. On Lumiform, change the template after some inspections are complete, retrieve an earlier one, assign an action to an outside person and see what that person can open. On Mitti, create an investigation, download the OSHA forms from a test establishment and compare them with what your recordkeeper completes today, then run the QR route and a guest seat for the same outside person and compare visibility. End by writing both quotes for the same headcount over twelve months, with every conditional item priced.

Worked evaluation scenarios

These scenarios are hypothetical. They show how to turn the record facts into a demo test and what outcome would change a choice; they are not case studies or customer results.

Hypothetical: a depot network that files its own injury logs

A distribution company with twelve US depots prepares its injury logs in-house. The Mitti record documents investigations that link issues, files and actions, with OSHA Forms 300, 300A and 301 downloadable as PDF, or as a CSV prepared for OSHA's Injury Tracking Application; it needs a full seat and direct submission is not described. The Lumiform record describes no equivalent output. In the demo, create a test establishment in Mitti, enter three invented cases, download both formats and hand them to the person who files today. For Lumiform, ask how that person would compile the same logs from forms and analytics exports. A CSV that needs heavy rework, or a Lumiform answer that depends on custom building, would favour the route that costs the filer less time.

Hypothetical: crews who dictate in another language

A maintenance contractor sends crews into plant basements with weak signal, and many of them work mainly in a language other than the one the office uses. Lumiform lists voice-to-text, but its record could not establish disconnected use by device and language, and it separates the app's interface languages from translated checklist content. The Mitti record ties AI voice drafts to a minimum app version and a list of input languages, writes the details in the organisation's language and does not establish offline processing. Give a native speaker the same defect to dictate in each app, first online and then with the connection off, and compare the fields filled and the output language. If dictation fails offline in both, treat typing as the baseline and decide on other criteria.

Hypothetical: forty small sites with mixed roles

A franchise operator has forty small sites and three kinds of people: inspectors who complete checklists, managers who only review, and an outside contractor who reports faults. The Mitti record divides access into full, lite and guest seats, reserves investigations, the API and integrations for a full seat, and notes that the price page does not say which seat the published Premium amount covers. The Lumiform record quotes by package, with approvals and integrations in Enterprise or as add-ons. List each person by role first. In Mitti, assign each role a seat and note what it blocks; in Lumiform, request a quote for the same roles with each add-on itemised. If most people need the costliest seat or add-on, a headline figure from either vendor will understate the total.

What the records do not establish

Lumiform

A numeric subscription price, the length or eligibility of a trial, or what a Professional add-on for approvals or API costs.
Whether voice-to-text works without a connection on a given device and language.
Whether a submitted report can be locked: the record says such reports can be edited and asks for a demonstration of version history and locks.

Mitti (by SafetyCulture)

Which seat type the Premium amount covers, or any price for lite seats, Enterprise or location-based pricing.
Offline processing for voice-drafted issues, or direct submission of OSHA data rather than a file for upload.
That a completed inspection works as a governed audit with independent closure of corrective actions.

Neither product

Relative implementation time, total cost, user satisfaction or fit with your regulator: both records are reviews of vendor documentation, not trials.
A connector to your own systems, or the work and cost of building one.

Written from the profile records and the decision guide above, not from a hands-on test. Where a record is silent, the page says so instead of filling the gap.

Evaluate Lumiform

Identify the exact product, application and licence.
Review the profile's demonstration questions.
Run the same task and record unresolved questions.

See Lumiform profile

Evaluate Mitti (by SafetyCulture)

Identify the exact product, application and licence.
Review the profile's demonstration questions.
Run the same task and record unresolved questions.

See Mitti (by SafetyCulture) profile

Lumiform vs Mitti (by SafetyCulture) | FAQ

Which product is cheaper?

Comparable total cost has not been established. Request the same applications, users, sites, configuration, migration, integrations and support period from both vendors. Published entry pricing is subject to the plan conditions shown in each profile.

How should I compare offline capability?

Use the exact proposed mobile application and plan. Download required data, disconnect, create a record with a photo, reconnect and inspect synchronization. Record which preparation and tasks require connectivity.

How should I decide between these products?

Set acceptance criteria for your actual workflow. Complete the same demo, record observed results separately from vendor statements and resolve remaining questions in a scoped pilot. The linked profiles show the sources and review status for each product.

Vendor sources and next steps

Lumiform16 sources, profile checked 10 October 2026

Mitti (by SafetyCulture)25 sources, profile checked 3 October 2026

Record the same demo tasks in the scorecard →

Related comparisons

Need a personalised shortlist?

Answer the matching questionnaire to explore up to 5 platforms based on your industry, size and processes, then verify the requirements with each vendor.

Get matched