Safe365 Alternatives
5 of 63 products that share a software category or a capability term with Safe365, matched on what their records document.
Alternative products to investigate
Among the products whose records share the most documented attributes with Safe365: Emex, myosh, Q-Hub, Safework Suite and SoftExpert (alphabetical, not a ranking).
Safe365 record checked 12 October 2026. Sources and limitations in the Safe365 profile · How candidates are matched · Already using Safe365? What to check before switching
Safe365's own record: categories, offline status, pricing and trial
Software categories: EHS Management. Offline filter: Not yet classified. Pricing: Safe365 publishes $39 USD per month (up to 5 users) or $429 USD per year, as shown on the USA pricing page (check product, module and purchase scope) (model: “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”). Trial: trial or demo on request.
- Emex
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against Safe365
Why listed: Categories shared with Safe365: EHS Management. Pricing: Emex and Safe365 both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Emex has a published amount recorded as “CarbonGo only: EUR 1,000/month for up to 5 sites” (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Offline filter: Emex, documented offline workflow; Safe365, not yet classified. Trial: Emex, trial status not established; Safe365, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Emex only: Incident Management, Inspection Management and Carbon Accounting. Conditional in Emex's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “CarbonGo emissions reporting” and “API integration”.
Against Safe365: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Emex, “Incident investigations”; Safe365, “Benchmark comparison” and “Multi-site profiles (Enterprise Connect)”. Pricing model: Emex, “Contact vendor for EHS; published CarbonGo subscription”; Safe365, “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”.
- myosh
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against Safe365
Why listed: Categories shared with Safe365: EHS Management. Pricing: myosh and Safe365 both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; myosh publishes AUD 228/month plus AUD 3,768 one-time licence (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Offline filter: myosh, partial offline workflow; Safe365, not yet classified. Software categories assigned to myosh only: Incident Management and Inspection Management. Conditional in myosh's record (2 of 5 capabilities): “Quality records, document control and supplier-quality audits” and “Offline record creation”.
Against Safe365: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: myosh, “Inspection form configuration” and “Incident investigation”; Safe365, “Benchmark comparison” and “Board-style reports and dashboards” (2 of 4). Pricing model: myosh, “Subscription plus one-time licence fee”; Safe365, “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”.
- Q-Hub
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against Safe365
Why listed: Categories shared with Safe365: EHS Management. Pricing: Q-Hub and Safe365 both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Q-Hub publishes £85 per month (Starter plan, monthly price shown; the page says billing is annual) (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: Q-Hub, free trial documented; Safe365, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Q-Hub only: Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Document Control. Conditional in Q-Hub's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Risk assessment, safety observations and forms” and “Supplier management”.
Against Safe365: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Q-Hub, “Document control and approvals” and “One platform for ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001”; Safe365, “Benchmark comparison” and “Multi-site profiles (Enterprise Connect)”. Pricing model: Q-Hub, “Published plans priced per month by number of Full and Basic users; Enterprise by quote”; Safe365, “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”. Access, security and record controls: Q-Hub, “REST API, webhooks and single sign-on” (documented) and “Security and hosting statements” (conditional); Safe365, “Information security statements” (conditional) and “Offline use and single sign-on” (unverified).
- Safework Suite
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against Safe365
Why listed: Categories shared with Safe365: EHS Management. Pricing: Safework Suite and Safe365 both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; Safework Suite has a published amount recorded as “From $399 per month, billed annually, for 4 tools and 50 employees (Essentials)” (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: Safework Suite, trial status not established; Safe365, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to Safework Suite only: Incident Management. Conditional in Safework Suite's record (2 of 4 capabilities): “Mobile access” and “Reporting and dashboards”.
Against Safe365: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: Safework Suite, “Incident investigation” and “Inspections”; Safe365, “Benchmark comparison” and “Multi-site profiles (Enterprise Connect)”. Pricing model: Safework Suite, “Published Essentials plan; Premium and Enterprise by quote”; Safe365, “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”. Access, security and record controls: Safework Suite, “Security attestations” (conditional); Safe365, “Information security statements” (conditional) and “Offline use and single sign-on” (unverified).
- SoftExpert
Shares: EHS Management
Why listed, where it differs, against Safe365
Why listed: Categories shared with Safe365: EHS Management. Pricing: SoftExpert and Safe365 both have published amounts; check each profile's product, module and purchase scope; SoftExpert publishes $30.00 per month at one user for the Risks Start plan, shown on the English pricing page only after that need is chosen (check product, module and purchase scope).
Where it differs: Trial: SoftExpert, trial status not established; Safe365, trial or demo on request. Software categories assigned to SoftExpert only: Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Governance, Risk & Compliance. Conditional in SoftExpert's record: “Mobile and offline use” and “ESG-style indicators and exports”.
Against Safe365: Documented, sharing no word with any capability, category or tag in the other record: SoftExpert, “Legal and regulatory requirements” and “Document control and licence records” (2 of 5); Safe365, “Benchmark comparison” and “Multi-site profiles (Enterprise Connect)” (2 of 3). Pricing model: SoftExpert, “Self-service monthly per-user plans (Start, Standard, Premium) for a chosen need; Enterprise on request”; Safe365, “Regional pages differ: USD plans on the USA page; price on application on the UK and NZ pages”.
Continue the alternatives research
Check the same evidence-led view from each candidate's starting point; its matched set may differ because the documented record differs.
58 more not listed. Browse the EHS Management category.
Already using Safe365? What its record leaves open
Limitations the Safe365 profile records:
- Price is on application on the UK page and for Custom Plans
- Offline use, single sign-on and the benchmark data are not described
- Operational record keeping beyond reports, checklists and inductions is not described
Available only under stated conditions or not documented (checked 12 October 2026): AI-generated summaries and recommendations; Power BI reporting and API; Information security statements; Offline use and single sign-on. Check each against the contract you hold.
Safe365 evaluation checks, for every candidate
- Benchmark basis: Ask which organisations, sectors and regions make up the comparison and how often it is refreshed. Source
- Assessment method: Request the question set and scoring rules for the 10 modules and test how different respondents affect the score. Source
- Action follow-through: Trace a roadmap action from recommendation to owner, due date, evidence and closure. Source
- Reporting app depth: Check the app against your reporting needs, including offline use, notifications and links to roadmap actions. Source
- Plan and price: Confirm which regional pricing page applies, what each plan includes, and the cost of contractors, multiple profiles and API access. Source
- Security evidence: Ask for current certificates, scope and hosting details behind the statements on the vendor's pages. Source
Leaving Safe365: what to plan for
- Document each site profile separately before leaving. The record describes profiles per site or business unit that each own their data and roll into an aggregated view, and says permissions between units are not described, so note who could see which profile and how the roll-up was assembled.
- Identify the plan and the regional pricing page that apply to your contract. The USA page lists plans by user count while the UK and NZ pages show only price on application, and maturity assessment, gap analysis and benchmarking data are listed from Essentials upward, which decides what has to be replaced.
- Keep the question set, the answers and the date of every assessment. The record says the assessment is measured against ISO 45001 and legislation references and that the scoring rules are not shown, so a different method cannot be assumed to give a comparable result, and the history needs an explanation of where the series breaks.
Who may have reason to stay with Safe365
- An airport or an airport operating partner using the Airport Safety Culture solution has a framework the record describes as developed with Team Heathrow, with four assessment modules and benchmarking. The outcomes quoted on that page are the vendor's own statements, and the record gives no basis for assuming another maturity tool carries the same module set.
- A team already using the app for reports with camera and voice capture, checklists, inductions and surveys on one console would be moving four kinds of records. The record does not describe the follow-up steps or the notifications, so a candidate has to show what it does with each of them before a move is worth the effort.
- Where AI-generated summaries and suggested improvement pathways are already part of how the roadmap was drawn up, note the record's own gap: the model and the review step are not described. What can be tested is what a user can edit.
What to test in a trial of a replacement for Safe365
- Run the assessment for two sites in the candidate, then ask for the aggregated view, the roadmap and the owner of each action. Add a second site profile afterwards and watch how the roll-up changes, since multi-site comparison is the part a single-site trial hides.
- Request the question set and the scoring rules, then have two people answer the same module separately and compare the outputs. How different respondents move the result is a property of the method, and the record asks for it to be tested rather than assumed.
- Report a hazard from a phone with a photo and a voice note, then follow the record to the console and the dashboard and note which follow-up or notification step happens, since the record leaves those undescribed. Start with the phone out of signal, as the record advises.
Conditions and sources in the Safe365 profile · Recorded commercial terms
Safe365 alternatives — frequently asked questions
Which Safe365 alternatives have published amounts?
Published amounts (see each profile's product, module and purchase scope): Emex, myosh, Q-Hub, Safework Suite and SoftExpert. Safe365 has a published amount; check the profile's product, module and purchase scope.
Which Safe365 alternatives have a documented offline workflow?
Documented offline workflow: Emex. Partial offline workflow: myosh. Not yet classified: Q-Hub, Safework Suite and SoftExpert. Offline filter: Safe365, not yet classified.
Which Safe365 alternatives document a free trial?
Free trial documented: Q-Hub. Trial or demo on request: myosh. Trial status not established: Emex, Safework Suite and SoftExpert. Trial: Safe365, trial or demo on request.