Skip to main content
    QHSEtech
    Updated
    All glossary terms
    Content date: · No individual check logged· AI use

    IMSIntegrated Management System

    Definition

    Integrated Management System — coordinated policies, processes and records serving more than one management standard, such as quality, environment and safety.

    Editorial definition: The QHSE Standard, updated 3 October 2026 · https://qhsetech.com/glossary/ims

    Scope: Shared records can reduce duplication, but each applicable requirement still needs to be addressed.

    Sources checked: . Examples are editorial illustrations.

    What an integrated management system is, and what ISO publishes about it

    An integrated management system, or IMS, is one set of policies, processes, responsibilities and records that serves more than one management system standard, typically quality, environment and occupational health and safety. IMS is not itself a standard. ISO's management system standards page describes many ISO management system standards as sharing the same structure and many of the same terms, definitions and requirements, and it lists more than 80 of them. That common design is what makes integration practical. ISO also publishes a practical guide to integrated management systems, which its page describes as helping organisations that use or plan to use several management system standards build one cohesive and efficient system.

    The standards an IMS usually draws on are at different points in their life cycle. ISO's pages list ISO 9001:2026 as edition 6, published in September 2026, and ISO 14001:2026 as edition 4, published in April 2026, with the 2015 editions of both withdrawn. ISO 45001:2018 is shown as confirmed in 2024 and due to be revised, with a draft named as the next version under development. ISO says the 2026 edition of ISO 9001 is better aligned with other management system standards, and its ISO 14001 page says the new edition is designed to fit with existing ISO management systems. An IMS therefore needs a record of which edition each part follows and when each is expected to change.

    Integration is a design choice, not a requirement. ISO's ISO 9001 page describes certification as not mandatory, and whether to certify is decided standard by standard. A shared structure helps with the processes the standards have in common, such as document control, internal audit, management review and corrective action, while subject-specific work such as hazard identification or environmental aspects still needs its own method. This page is general information, not advice on any certification decision.

    Sources opened :

    What an IMS record set looks like in software

    • A requirements map that links each shared procedure and form to the standards, laws and customer requirements it answers, so one document can be traced to several sources.
    • One document register with owners, revision history and the edition of each standard referenced.
    • A combined internal audit programme whose reports still show findings and conclusions separately for each standard.
    • A single corrective action process, with a discipline or standard field so each action reaches the right owner.
    • Separate subject registers for hazards, environmental aspects and product or service risks, each with its own method and review dates.
    • Management review inputs grouped by discipline, with minutes that show which decision applies to which system.
    • A change record for each standard, with the edition in force, the planned transition and the owner.

    IMS, QHSE and a combined certificate

    QHSE names the scope of quality, health, safety and environment, while an IMS names the way one system is built to cover several standards, and the two are often discussed together. A combined audit visit is also not a single certificate. Certificates are issued by certification bodies against named standards, so an organisation with an IMS may hold one, two or three, and may decide to certify only some of them.

    A hypothetical example: three systems become one

    This case is invented to illustrate the record and describes no real company. A components manufacturer runs separate quality, environmental and safety systems. Each has its own document control procedure, internal audit procedure and management review procedure, which makes 9 shared-process documents (3 processes for each of 3 systems). After integration it keeps 3, one for each shared process, and a requirements map shows which standards each one answers, so 6 documents are retired.

    The hazard register, the environmental aspects register and the product risk register stay separate, because each follows a different method. The first combined internal audit uses one team and one schedule but produces three conclusions. When the safety standard moves towards its revision, the change record opens a task for that part of the system only, and the other parts are left as they are.

    Common misunderstandings about an IMS

    • An IMS is not a standard, and ISO's guide to it is guidance for building a system, not a requirement to follow.
    • Sharing a structure does not mean every requirement is shared. Each standard keeps its own scope, so subject-specific work still needs its own method and records.
    • A combined audit does not give a combined certificate. Certification is a separate decision for each standard.
    • The standards do not move together. Two of the three common standards are on 2026 editions and the safety standard is in revision, so the system needs per-standard version control.
    • Software does not make an IMS. A tool holds the records, but decisions about ownership, shared processes and which subjects stay separate are made by the organisation.

    How an IMS relates to other glossary terms

    An IMS links the individual standards and the wider quality, health, safety and environment scope.

    • QHSE: the scope that an integrated system most often covers.
    • ISO 9001: the quality standard, now in a 2026 edition, that an IMS often includes.
    • ISO 45001: the occupational health and safety standard, shown by ISO as due for revision.
    • Management review: a shared process where decisions for each system are recorded together.

    Records and evidence that usually exist for an IMS

    • The scope statement and the list of standards the system covers.
    • The requirements map and the shared procedures it points to.
    • The audit programme, with reports and conclusions for each standard.
    • Management review minutes with decisions marked by system.
    • A register of the edition of each standard in force and the planned transition.
    • Corrective action records that show the discipline and the owner.

    What a software tool needs to capture for an IMS

    • A requirements map from each document, process or control to several standards at once.
    • A document register that shows revision history and the standard edition referenced.
    • Audit records that give conclusions for each standard from a single audit event.
    • A discipline or standard field on findings and actions, with separate owners and filters.
    • Role-based access, so sensitive health data is not visible to every user of the quality records.
    • A change log for standards and legal requirements, with owners and transition dates.

    Catalog profiles documenting ISO management-system support

    The list comes from the ISO management-system rule used by the ISO management software guide. It does not show that a product supports an integrated system for any particular combination of standards, which should be checked with your own list.

    Same rule for every product: tagged “ISO Management” or “Quality Management”, with a sourced ISO management-system support capability in its record, or one the vendor stated to us, labelled as vendor-stated. Documented and conditional capabilities qualify; check the linked scope before treating a module as included.

    Tekmon pays for a sponsored placement (above); its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. How lists are ordered

    All 9 matching profiles are shown. Documentation review, not hands-on testing or a claim of compliance.

    Related software

    Frequently asked questions

    Do I need certification to run an IMS?

    No. Integration is a way of organising your own system. Certification is a separate decision for each standard, made with a certification body, and ISO's ISO 9001 page describes it as not mandatory.

    Is an IMS the same as QHSE?

    They overlap but are not the same. QHSE names a scope of quality, health, safety and environment, while an IMS describes one system built to serve more than one standard.

    What happens to an IMS when one standard is revised?

    The shared processes usually stay, and the part tied to that standard is updated. Keep a record of the edition each part follows, and check the transition arrangements for each standard separately.

    More qhse terms

    Related guides