Skip to main content
    QHSEtech
    Updated 25 September 2026
    Software Roundup

    JSA Software: task steps, hazards and controls

    A job safety analysis (JSA, also called a job hazard analysis or JHA) breaks a task into steps, identifies the hazards of each step and records the controls, usually before the work starts. Compare a dedicated JSA module with pre-task plans, configurable safety forms and broader workplace safety records. The product list below follows one published rule and draws on vendor documentation, not hands-on testing; it identifies workflow boundaries to verify in a demo. It does not treat a completed checklist as permission to start work.

    Jump to the 15 products

    Editorial responsibility: Dimitris Mitsios (Founder of The QHSE Standard; product marketing at Tekmon) · Tekmon pays for sponsored placements on this site (disclosure) · How pages are made · LinkedIn

    TekmonAd

    Explore its published safety, quality and maintenance workflows. Confirm modules and pricing in a scoped proposal.

    On this page (5 sections)

    JSA, JHA and pre-task-plan products to test

    A dedicated JSA module, a pre-task plan inside a construction platform and a configurable form are different purchases. Build your own JSA in each demonstration, with its task steps, hazards, controls and review roles, before comparing them.

    Tekmon pays for a sponsored placement (above); its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. How lists are ordered

    Same rule for every product: tagged “Risk Assessment”, “Hazard Management”, “Safety Management”, “EHS Management”, “EHS”, “Construction Safety”, “Permit to Work”, “Permits to Work (PTW)” or “Control of Work”, with a sourced job safety analysis (JSA/JHA) or pre-task planning capability in its record, or one the vendor stated to us, labelled as vendor-stated. 15 qualify; the first 8 are shown, then the other 7.

    • Safetymint

      Documented: Control-of-work linkage (conditional). Source: safetymint.com

    • SafetyReports

      SafetyReports publishes a JSA-specific offline procedure: prepare reference databases and selected JSAs before disconnection, then explicitly synchronize changes. Current suite pricing places JSA in Premium; do not assume the standalone Inspection subscription includes it. Plan a demonstration of revisions, crew access and final review, and confirm whether sharing a PDF meets your needs or whether live acknowledgment and version control are required. Source: helpcenter.safetyreports.com

    • Synergi Life (DNV)

      Documented: Contractor and third-party operational controls. Source: dnv.com

    • Tekmon

      Vendor-stated: Job Safety Analysis. Not yet confirmed in public documentation; ask to see it in a demo.

    • Cority

      Documented: Operational risk assessment and control verification. Source: cority.com

    • HammerTech

      Documents permit and pre-task-plan workflows for construction projects alongside worker orientations. A complete offline matrix for permits and pre-task plans was not established by our research; build your JSA as a pre-task plan and demonstrate crew sign-off in the proposed configuration. Source: hammertech.com

    • IAMTech iPermit

      Documented: JSA and HIRA risk assessment. Source: go.iamtech.com

    • ITRAK 365

      Documented: Field hazard assessments and control library. Source: itrak365.com

    Offline scope, pricing and fit
    ProductPublished priceFree trialOffline workflow
    SafetymintYesFree trial documentedPartial
    SafetyReportsYesFree trial documentedPartial
    Synergi Life (DNV)YesFree trial documentedPartial
    TekmonNoFree trial documentedDocumented
    CorityNoNot establishedDocumented

    Status labels from each profile's sourced record; open the profile for the evidence and dates.

    The table shows the first 5 products of the list, in the same order; every profile carries the same fields.

    Run the same procurement exercise for every product you compare

    Bring one assessment with task steps, hazards, controls and review responsibilities.
    Change a control mid-task and identify which version each worker sees.
    Prepare a device, disconnect it, record changes, reconnect and inspect the final record.
    Test how a worker raises a concern without signing an assessment they do not understand.
    Check contractor access, record export and retention after account removal.
    Obtain a proposal covering modules, users, onboarding, integrations and renewals.
    Show library control: which JSAs are approved or draft, who may change them, and how a crew's site-specific edit is fed back to the template owner without altering the approved version.
    Show how approval is tiered, so routine low-hazard work is not held for a senior sign-off while high-hazard work still requires an approved template.

    Where a JHA sits in US OSHA requirements

    OSHA's Job Hazard Analysis booklet (OSHA 3071, 2002 revised) describes the method: focus on job tasks, look at the relationship between the worker, the task, the tools and the work environment, and prioritise jobs with severe-injury potential, new or changed jobs and complex jobs. It is guidance, not a standard that requires a written JHA for every task.

    Specific standards can still require a documented assessment. For example, 29 CFR 1910.132(d) requires the employer to assess the workplace for hazards that call for personal protective equipment and to verify that assessment through a written certification. Check which requirements apply to your work before deciding what the JSA record must contain.

    Task review is separate from permit authorization

    A permit-to-work workflow needs its own authorization rules, roles and checks. Demonstrate any proposed connection to the assessment, including what happens when a control changes after approval.

    A signature records acknowledgment; it does not establish understanding or competence. Map JSA, JHA and SWMS terminology to your process and applicable requirements. A generic form does not establish that a product produces every required document or that the controls are suitable.

    Use findings from near-miss reports and risk assessments to review the workflow with responsible people.

    Sources and how we evaluated this

    Reviewed using linked official documentation and the source list of each linked profile, which carries its own check date. The comparison retains pricing conditions rather than estimating rates.

    Our evaluation methodology uses functional depth 25%, usability and adoption 20%, implementation and TCO 15%, integrations and API 15%, security and trust 15%, and customer voice 10%. No numerical score or customer-review rating is assigned here.

    This is documentation research, not certification or hands-on testing. AI-assisted explanations may be incomplete and do not replace primary documentation or a demo. Sponsored placements and partner introductions are separate from this list.

    Compare the implementation scope

    Build a shortlist using task-level evidence, access requirements and a complete proposal.

    Browse All Solutions