TRIRTotal Recordable Incident Rate
Total Recordable Incident Rate — recordable cases multiplied by 200,000 and divided by hours worked, using the US incidence-rate convention.
Editorial definition: The QHSE Standard, updated 3 October 2026 · https://qhsetech.com/glossary/trir
Scope: Define the reporting population and period; a low rate alone does not establish control of serious hazards.
How the rate is built, and what feeds it
BLS gives the formula as the number of injuries and illnesses multiplied by 200,000 and divided by employee hours worked, and explains that 200,000 stands for 100 employees working 40 hours a week for 50 weeks, so the result reads as cases per 100 full-time workers per year. BLS says hours worked should exclude any non-work time, even when paid, such as vacation, sick leave and holidays, and it names OSHA Forms 300 and 300A, payroll or other time records as the sources of the counts and hours. Its worked example is 7 cases over 400,000 hours, giving 3.5.
The numerator depends on what counts as recordable. OSHA's general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7 make a work-related injury or illness recordable if it results in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid or loss of consciousness. Certain significant conditions diagnosed by a health care professional, such as cancer, a chronic irreversible disease, a fractured or cracked bone or a punctured eardrum, must also be recorded. Because the numerator is the outcome of a classification, two sites with identical events can report different rates if they classify differently.
Other conventions exist. The IOGP user guide for its safety data series defines a total recordable injury rate as the sum of fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases per million hours worked, and it says its results are presented per million hours while OSHA's incidence rates represent injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (200,000 hours). A figure quoted without its multiplier is therefore ambiguous: the same cases and hours give a number five times larger on a million-hour base. BLS also advises that, when comparing with industry rates, you consider the size of the employer and whether the comparison is for total recordable cases or for cases with days away, job transfer or restriction.
Sources opened :
- BLS: how to compute your firm's incidence rate for safety management (opens in a new tab)
- OSHA: 29 CFR 1904.7, general recording criteria (opens in a new tab)
- IOGP: Safety data reporting user guide, scope and definitions, 2018 data (report 2018su, January 2019) (PDF) (opens in a new tab)
- OSHA: Recommended Practices for Safety and Health Programs, program evaluation and improvement (opens in a new tab)
What a TRIR record set holds in software
- Case-level records classified against the recording criteria in force, with the decision, the date and the person who made it, so that the numerator can be rebuilt.
- Hours worked by period, site and employer group, with the source (payroll, time system, estimate) and a flag for estimated values.
- The population definition: employees only, or also agency workers, contractors and visitors, and the reason.
- The formula and multiplier stored with each reported figure, with the reporting period and the date it was calculated.
- Corrections, such as late-classified cases and revised hours, with the earlier figure kept visible.
- Links to related measures, such as cases with days away, restriction or transfer, so that one data set feeds all of them.
TRIR, DART and LTIFR
TRIR counts every recordable case. DART narrows the numerator to cases with days away, restricted work or job transfer, and BLS treats it as a separate comparison measure. LTIFR counts lost-time cases, and its multiplier and day-counting rules vary between schemes. The three share the idea of hours worked as the denominator and differ in numerator and multiplier, so a table that mixes them without labels misleads. A figure called an incident rate without the word recordable is looser still, because it may include near misses or first aid cases.
A hypothetical example: four cases, then a wider population
This case is invented and describes no real site. A warehouse records 4 cases that meet the recording criteria in a year, and its time records show 380,000 hours worked by its own employees. The rate is 4 x 200,000 / 380,000, which is 2.11 to two decimals. One more recordable case would give 2.63, and the same four cases over 10% more hours (418,000) would give 1.91, so a single event moves the figure by about half a point at this size.
The following year the warehouse adds agency workers to the same log and adds their hours, and the rate falls although no practice changed, because the denominator grew faster than the numerator. A reader who saw only the two figures would infer an improvement. The record that stored the population definition and the source of the hours lets the safety manager explain the change, and a note beside the second figure states that the populations differ. The site also reports cases by severity alongside the rate, because the rate counts a minor strain and a serious injury as one case each.
Common misunderstandings about TRIR
- A low TRIR does not show that serious hazards are controlled. It counts cases, not severity, and a site can record few cases while a high-consequence hazard goes unmanaged. OSHA's recommended practices say that both lagging and leading indicators should be used.
- Rates move with small numbers. At a few hundred thousand hours a single case changes the figure noticeably, so a month-to-month change at one site is often noise.
- TRIR is not a legal compliance score. The legal duties are to record and, in defined cases, report; the rate is a derived measure that organisations, customers and tenders choose to use.
- The multiplier is not universal. A TRIR of 1.2 quoted without saying whether it uses 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours leaves the number open to a fivefold misreading.
How TRIR relates to other glossary terms
TRIR is one of a family of rates and sits beside the terms that say what the rate leaves out.
- LTIFR: a rate on lost-time cases only, usually quoted on a different hours base.
- Serious injury or fatality: a classification by severity or potential severity, which a rate on all recordable cases does not provide.
- Near miss: events with no harm, which the rate does not count at all.
- Management review: where rates, trends and other performance evidence are examined and acted on by top management.
Records and evidence that usually exist for TRIR
- The log of recordable cases and the criteria used to classify them, with decision records for borderline cases.
- Hours worked by period and group, with source documents or the method of estimation.
- The written definition of the rate: numerator, population, multiplier and period.
- Calculation worksheets or system reports showing how each reported rate was derived and who checked it.
- Records of corrections or restatements and the reason for each.
- Companion measures, such as severity or leading indicators, reported beside the rate.
What a software tool needs to capture for TRIR
- Case classification that follows the recording criteria in use and stores the reasoning, so the numerator can be audited.
- Hours imported from a time or payroll system, with the source and period stored and a way to flag estimates.
- Population controls (employees, agency, contractors) that change the rate transparently and are shown in the report.
- A stored multiplier and formula on each output, with 200,000 and 1,000,000 as choices and no silent default.
- Restatement handling, so that a later reclassification updates the rate and keeps the earlier figure visible.
Catalog profiles documenting incident recording and reporting
A documented incident-recording capability does not establish a recordable-rate calculation. In a demonstration, ask to see the case classification, the source of the hours and the multiplier.
Same rule for every product: tagged “Incident Management” or “Incident Reporting”, with a sourced incident reporting or management capability in its record, or one the vendor stated to us, labelled as vendor-stated. Documented and conditional capabilities qualify; check the linked scope before treating a module as included.
Tekmon pays for a sponsored placement (above); its place in this list follows the same rule as every entry. How lists are ordered
FirstPriority · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
EHS Insight · Offline inspections and incidents · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Safesite · Incident administration and closure · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
1Life · Incident workflows, corrective actions and monitoring · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
300log · OSHA 301 incident report · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Chemical Safety (EMS) · Employee workplace safety · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Emex · Offline incident capture · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Intelex · Incident and action workflow · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Mitti (by SafetyCulture) · First aid forms in the Mitti template library · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Q-Hub · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Safetymint · Incident investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SafetyReports · Incident investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Synergi Life (DNV) · Incident investigation and corrective follow-up · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Tekmon · Incident capture, routing and follow-up · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Capptions · Incident, risk, observation and training processes · Conditional
Vendor source · Profile checked
Cority · Incident investigation and actions · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Enablon · Integrated quality, incident, nonconformance and CAPA management · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
ERA-EHS · Health & Safety workflows · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Evotix · Incident, risk and inspection workflows · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
HSI Donesafe · Incident investigation and action review · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
ITRAK 365 · Incident and near-miss investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
myosh · Incident investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Qooling · Incident-to-CAPA follow-up · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Quentic · Offline incident and inspection capture · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Safety Champion · Safety incidents and actions · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Safety Evolution · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SafetyAmp · Photo-supported incidents · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SAP Environment, Health, and Safety · Incident handling · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SoftExpert · Incident and near-miss reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Vatix · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
VelocityEHS · Incident investigation and OSHA reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Workhub · Incident and hazard records · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Assignar · Field forms · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Benchmark Gensuite · Incident investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
BizzMine · Incident, inspection and risk modules · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Dakota Software · Incident and observation reporting with OSHA forms · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Ecesis · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
EHS Hero · Incident and near-miss reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
HSI · Incident reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Ideagen EHS · EHS incident reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
iProtectU · Incident reporting and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Mango QHSE · Incident evidence · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Notify Technology · Incident, near miss and hazard reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Onspring · Incident intake, routing and escalation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Optial · Incident capture and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Procore Quality & Safety · Incident investigation records · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Qavach.AI · Incident-to-action workflow · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Red-on-line Core · Incident management and investigation · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Riskonnect · Safety incident lifecycle · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Safety Mojo · Incident reports · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SafetyStratus · Incident reporting, investigation and recordkeeping · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Salus · Incident capture and OSHA recordkeeping context · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SciSure Health & Safety (EHS) · Incident and near-miss reporting · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
SMS360 · Incident capture, investigation and corrective actions · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
Sodales · Incident reporting with offline capture · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
TenForce · Incident and near-miss management · Documented
Vendor source · Profile checked
All 56 matching profiles are shown. Documentation review, not hands-on testing or a claim of compliance.
Related software
Frequently asked questions
What is a good TRIR?
There is no universal good value. Compare with employers of similar size and work, using the same case definitions and multiplier, and read the result beside severity and leading measures.
Are contractor hours included?
It depends on who is on the log and what the customer or scheme asks. Record the population definition so that the rate can be explained, and ask what a customer's request expects.
Why do two sites with similar hours report different rates?
Different case counts can reflect real differences, but also classification, reporting culture and the population counted. Compare the definitions first.
More safety terms
Related guides
- VPP (Voluntary Protection Programs) — definition, software & FAQs
Definition of the Voluntary Protection Programs.
- Recordable Incident — definition, software & FAQs
Definition of a recordable incident.
- DART Rate (Days Away, Restricted or Transferred) — definition, software & FAQs
Definition of the DART rate.
- Lagging Indicator — definition, software & FAQs
Definition of a lagging indicator.
- Leading Indicator — definition, software & FAQs
Definition of an indicator of preventive activity.