QHSE, EHS & ESG Software Directory
Explore catalog entries across safety, quality, environmental work and sustainability. Use filters to find candidates, then compare the documented scope and open questions on their profiles.
Content review record: · Editorial review by Dimitris Mitsios
View results (154)
Applies to the assessed workflow, not every feature. Unclassified does not mean offline is unavailable.
Software categories match a primary product type or an additional application. Modules may be purchased separately. Processes below describe the work you need to manage; category membership does not establish every capability.
Showing 1–21 of 154 catalog entries
The default order is curated and starts with Tekmon, a featured commercial partner. It is not a personalised ranking. Product source dates are shown on each profile. Read the methodology and disclosure.
Software results
Enablon
EHS Management
Connect field safety reporting with scoped plant-risk applications
4 (2 reviews)
Offline inspections (2026): Fulcrum vs SafetyCulture vs GoCanvas vs GoAudits vs Clappia
Source-check dates are listed per product. Compare the documented package and workflow, then verify your required scope with the vendor.
“Not scored” means no editorial composite rating was calculated. It is not a customer-review score. Best-for descriptions and price verdicts are editorial fit assessments, not hands-on test results.
Categories describe software types; processes describe work to manage. Category membership does not confirm a specific feature or included module. Check the quoted plan and workflow with each vendor.
Scroll the table horizontally to compare all five columns.
| Product | Works offline? | Pricing | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources checked | Mobile records can be collected offline; cloud synchronization needs connectivity. Prepare apps and required records before departure. The documented Esri basemap download feature requires Esri Maps to be enabled and supports Streets or Satellite, not Terrain or Hybrid. Download the work area on each device while connected. Demonstrate coverage boundaries, attachments and office receipt rather than treating offline capture as proof of a completed cloud handoff. | Professional is US$43 and Elite US$55 per user/month. All plans require an annual subscription and at least five users; Enterprise requires a proposal. Confirm taxes, additional storage and services. The official trial landing page advertises 14 days; confirm package access before evaluation.Fulcrum pricing details | Location-rich inspections and GIS field records | Not scored |
| Fulcrum: Is it worth the price? In our editorial judgment, Fulcrum may be worth its price when location-rich inspections justify the annual five-user commitment and required package. It is less suitable when a basic checklist meets the need or the team cannot justify the minimum subscription. | ||||
Sources checked | Yes: prepared mobile inspections; several connected features are unavailable offline. | Free plan; current regional paid price unconfirmed because the pricing page was inaccessible. Earlier research recorded Premium $24/full seat/month annually or $29 monthly, excluding taxes; confirm currency and current terms.SafetyCulture, now Mitti (by SafetyCulture) pricing details | Inspection templates and wider frontline workflows | Not scored |
| SafetyCulture, now Mitti (by SafetyCulture): Is it worth the price? Try the Free plan against your template needs; pay for demonstrated Premium requirements. | ||||
Sources checked
| Prepared mobile forms support offline completion and upload when connected. The help center recommends syncing before departure and on return. Sync also receives updated forms, reference data and dispatch or workflow assignments. Offline credential validation has a default 24-hour window, configurable by administrators up to 30 days; confirm the approved security setting before a prolonged disconnected shift. Offline entry does not establish an offline handoff to another user. | The packages page displays Essentials $29, Pro $39 and Max $49 per user/month with annual billing and a three-user minimum, but the retrieved text does not explicitly establish the dollar currency. Request a confirmed local quote including taxes and services. API access and multi-user workflows are listed from Pro; custom integrations and analytics are add-ons. The reviewed signup route advertises a 14-day free trial without a credit card; confirm the route and purchased-tier scope.GoCanvas pricing details | Replacing paper forms with configurable field submissions | Not scored |
| GoCanvas: Is it worth the price? In our editorial judgment, GoCanvas may be worth its quoted price when recurring field forms and the selected workflow tier justify three annually billed users. It is less suitable for a single occasional inspector or when custom integration and live-data needs exceed the agreed budget. | ||||
Sources checked
| The mobile app supports offline inspections, while the browser app is a separate surface. Official help requires an internet connection and Import Settings to pull new or changed checklists, locations and permissions from the portal. A separate help procedure uses Preview Report to synchronize completed or in-progress audit data to the cloud, followed by Complete and Share. Verify the current app behavior after reconnection; offline capture does not establish disconnected email notifications, external action links or approval completion. | The pricing page displays Starter $10 and Enterprise $30 per user per month with annual billing selected; the dollar currency and minimum paid seats were not explicitly established. Monthly billing is offered, but its amount was not verified. Starter lists one company/department, 25 sites, 10 checklist templates and two images per question; Enterprise lists unlimited companies, sites and checklist templates, four images per question with more by request, and additional roles, scheduling and analytics. SSO requires a pricing enquiry. Dedicated account manager eligibility is listed for annual plans over three users, not as a minimum purchase. The 14-day trial includes Enterprise features without a credit card.GoAudits pricing details | Checklist audits, reports and action plans | Not scored |
| GoAudits: Is it worth the price? In our editorial judgment, GoAudits may be worth its quoted price when repeatable inspections and action follow-up fit the selected plan's site and checklist scope. It is less suitable if the team expects Starter to include advanced permissions or needs an unverified disconnected browser workflow. | ||||
Sources checked | Open the required app online before disconnecting. Existing records must also be loaded before editing offline. The Android/iOS app queues submissions for later upload; submission status changes do not work offline. Browser link sharing has no offline mode. | The public INR schedule lists Starter at INR 600/user/month monthly or INR 450/user/month billed annually; Professional at INR 800 monthly or INR 600 billed annually. The Free plan allows up to 100 users and 400 submissions/month. The page also presents a separate dollar schedule; confirm checkout currency, taxes and local terms. Enterprise pricing is not publicly available, contact vendor. Include workflow usage and optional add-ons in the quote.Clappia pricing details | Teams with specific inspection forms and an internal owner who can configure and maintain them | Not scored |
| Clappia: Is it worth the price? Worth shortlisting when your forms change frequently and configuration ownership is realistic. Compare ongoing administration with the cost of a more predefined inspection tool. | ||||
Sources checked
| Offline form capture is documented. Reconciliation requires a network connection and the mobile app in the foreground; submissions can remain only in the device Outbox until that succeeds. Prepare current forms and lookup data before disconnecting. Reconnection alone does not guarantee background delivery. | Digital starts at $400 per month for the entire team, billed annually; the pricing display does not explicitly identify the dollar currency. Intelligent and Elite use custom pricing. Confirm team limits, currency, setup, add-ons and renewal terms. The current pricing matrix and technical documentation place REST API access in Intelligent and Elite, not Digital.TrueContext (formerly ProntoForms) pricing details | Field-service teams connecting asset inspections and technician records to established business systems | Not scored |
| TrueContext (formerly ProntoForms): Is it worth the price? TrueContext may justify its scoped price when field inspections need a maintained connection to an existing service or business system. It is less suitable for a simple checklist requirement without the budget or ownership needed to configure and support those handoffs. | ||||
Read the offline inspection guide and eight buyer questions
Workiva vs Persefoni vs Watershed vs Diligent ESG vs Novisto vs Greenly (2026)
Source-check dates are listed per product. Compare the documented package and workflow, then verify your required scope with the vendor.
“Not scored” means no editorial composite rating was calculated. It is not a customer-review score. Best-for descriptions and price verdicts are editorial fit assessments, not hands-on test results.
Categories describe software types; processes describe work to manage. Category membership does not confirm a specific feature or included module. Check the quoted plan and workflow with each vendor.
Scroll the table horizontally to compare all five columns.
| Product | Works offline? | Pricing | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources checked
| Offline capture, calculation and review not established; test interruption recovery. | Contact vendor; currency, term and minimum users unverified. Scope Carbon, reporting workspaces, interfaces and services separately.Workiva pricing details | Reporting teams coordinating sustainability contributors and disclosure reviewers | Not scored |
| Workiva: Is it worth the price? Workiva may justify a scoped quote when source-linked disclosure preparation and coordinated review address a demonstrated reporting problem. It is less suitable for a simple inventory-only requirement if the workspace, application and implementation scope adds cost without needed controls. | ||||
Sources checked
| Disconnected calculation or capture not established; test upload recovery. | Permanent free Pro, base single user. Extra users, selected exports and support may cost more; Advanced by proposal. Confirm APIs and release status.Persefoni pricing details | Teams building a repeatable carbon inventory from operational and supplier data, with reporting and assurance evidence to scope | Not scored |
| Persefoni: Is it worth the price? Persefoni Pro is worth evaluating when a single user needs a recurring carbon inventory and its included outputs meet customer requests. Advanced is more defensible when custom data ingestion and collaboration justify the proposal; it is less suitable as a replacement for operational incident or permit management. | ||||
Sources checked | Disconnected capture, calculation and review not established. | Contact vendor; amount, currency, term and minimum users unverified. Scope software, supplier access, interfaces and services.Watershed pricing details | Teams connecting emissions measurement and disclosure work with a maintained sustainability programme | Not scored |
| Watershed: Is it worth the price? Watershed may justify a proposal when measurement lineage and disclosure preparation need a connected operating process. It is less suitable if a basic inventory meets the requirement or the proposed services and interfaces cannot demonstrate value for the additional cost. | ||||
Sources checked | The reviewed ESG sources do not establish offline collection or synchronization. Ask which tasks require connectivity and how interrupted submissions recover; web access alone does not establish offline support. | Pricing is not publicly available, contact vendor. Request a quote naming ESG modules, entities, contributors, reporting templates, integrations, implementation and support. Confirm contract currency, billing period, minimum commitment and renewal terms. Review licensed emission-factor export rights separately from your own data exports.Diligent ESG pricing details | Sustainability teams coordinating recurring submissions across business units and suppliers | Not scored |
| Diligent ESG: Is it worth the price? Worth shortlisting when repeated collection and calculation work creates a substantial reporting burden. Compare the complete contract and implementation effort with a smaller carbon tool using your own reporting cycle, rather than applying vendor ROI figures to your organisation. | ||||
Sources checked | Native offline editing and approval not established; spreadsheet imports are not offline operation. | Quote required. Advertises unlimited users, data points and outputs with support; confirm modules, supplier access, interfaces and implementation.Novisto pricing details | Organizations coordinating multiple ESG contributors, reviewed metrics and recurring disclosures | Not scored |
| Novisto: Is it worth the price? Novisto may justify a scoped proposal when recurring ESG reporting requires accountable contributors and traceable review across multiple datasets. It is less suitable if the immediate need is a small standalone calculation without the ownership and budget needed for a governed reporting process. | ||||
Sources checked | Disconnected capture, calculation and review not established. | Quote required; currency, term and minimum users unverified. Custom API, SSO, extra entities and services are optional; confirm NZC survey entitlement.Greenly pricing details | Teams organising an initial or recurring carbon inventory and improving supplier attribution, including smaller teams needing scoped support | Not scored |
| Greenly: Is it worth the price? Greenly may justify a quote when supplier attribution and a supported recurring inventory solve a defined data-collection problem. It is less suitable if optional interfaces and services exceed the budget or the required survey and reporting scope cannot be demonstrated. | ||||
Read the ESG reporting comparison and buyer FAQs
Cority vs Intelex vs VelocityEHS (2026)
Source-check dates are listed per product. Compare the documented package and workflow, then verify your required scope with the vendor.
“Not scored” means no editorial composite rating was calculated. It is not a customer-review score. Best-for descriptions and price verdicts are editorial fit assessments, not hands-on test results.
Categories describe software types; processes describe work to manage. Category membership does not confirm a specific feature or included module. Check the quoted plan and workflow with each vendor.
Scroll the table horizontally to compare all five columns.
| Product | Works offline? | Pricing | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources checked | Selected myCority field capture documented; offline permit approvals and ESG review not established. | Contact vendor for combined scope; published pricing explanation describes an initial three-year term and separate implementation.Cority pricing details | Multi-site teams evaluating permit workflows alongside corporate sustainability reporting. | Not scored |
| Cority: Is it worth the price? Worth evaluating when the selected Safety and Sustainability applications share the required records and governance; request a scoped demonstration. | ||||
Sources checked | Mobile field capture documented, but Essentials lists responsive web, while Advanced and Enterprise list iOS/Android; confirm native offline tier. Permit approval and ESG offline steps unverified. | Contact vendor for combined scope. Safety Essentials starts at US$44/user/month, minimum 25 users, billed annually; not an evidenced PTW + ESG bundle.Intelex pricing details | Teams configuring work permits, incident applications and ESG data collection across sites. | Not scored |
| Intelex: Is it worth the price? Worth evaluating for configurable application requirements; do not price the full solution using the Essentials entry plan. | ||||
Sources checked | EHS mobile capture documented; no complete offline permit and sustainability workflow verified. | Contact vendor for selected applications and combined scope.VelocityEHS pricing details | Teams assessing contractor permitting alongside incidents, GHG data and materiality work. | Not scored |
| VelocityEHS: Is it worth the price? Worth evaluating where the application proposal connects operational tasks to the required sustainability data; verify entitlements and handoffs. | ||||
Compare permits, incidents and sustainability scope
Mobile safety and QHSE (2026): SafetyCulture vs SiteDocs vs Intelex
Source-check dates are listed per product. Compare the documented package and workflow, then verify your required scope with the vendor.
“Not scored” means no editorial composite rating was calculated. It is not a customer-review score. Best-for descriptions and price verdicts are editorial fit assessments, not hands-on test results.
Categories describe software types; processes describe work to manage. Category membership does not confirm a specific feature or included module. Check the quoted plan and workflow with each vendor.
Scroll the table horizontally to compare all five columns.
| Product | Works offline? | Pricing | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources checked | Yes: prepared mobile inspections; several connected features are unavailable offline. | Free plan; current regional paid price unconfirmed because the pricing page was inaccessible. Earlier research recorded Premium $24/full seat/month annually or $29 monthly, excluding taxes; confirm currency and current terms.SafetyCulture, now Mitti (by SafetyCulture) pricing details | Inspection templates and wider frontline workflows | Not scored |
| SafetyCulture, now Mitti (by SafetyCulture): Is it worth the price? Try the Free plan against your template needs; pay for demonstrated Premium requirements. | ||||
Sources checked | Yes, after connected login and synchronization. Completed work queues for upload after reconnection. | contact vendor; annual company subscription based on workforce size and requirements.SiteDocs pricing details | Safety forms, signatures and workforce documentation | Not scored |
| SiteDocs: Is it worth the price? Consider it when a consistent form and signature process serves the workforce. Compare the complete annual quote with per-seat alternatives before assuming a lower cost. | ||||
Sources checked | Mobile incident and inspection capture documented; verify tier and disconnected permit/ESG steps. | contact vendor for native mobile scope. Safety Essentials starts at US$44/user/month with 25-user minimum and annual billing, but lists responsive web; native apps are in Advanced and Enterprise.Intelex pricing details | Configured mobile capture connected to wider enterprise QHSE workflows | Not scored |
| Intelex: Is it worth the price? Worth considering when broader application and integration requirements justify the deployment. A small checklist-only crew should compare the complete proposal with simpler field tools. | ||||
Explore product comparisons
Compare documented scope, pricing questions and evidence gaps before choosing which products to test.